Sacramento County Grand Jury • 2012-2013 • Agency Response

Sacramento County Sheriff's Department Scott R. Jones Sheriff August 29, 2013 Honorable Laurie Earl, Presiding Judge*

Published: August 29, 2013 4 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 3 findings

F2 Page 1
The Grand Jury finds the Sheriff's Department and the OIG do not conduct an analysis of deputy-involved shooting incidents to identify the behavior, policy, or tactical issues that are present. The Grand Jury further finds the Sheriff's Department does not routinely review shooting cases to identify "lessons learned" that can be incorporated in training. Response to Finding 2: Partial Concurrence During this Grand Jury investigation the review of incidents by the Sheriff's Use of Force Tactical Review Board was not occurring. However, there were numerous strata of review that was occurring. The Sheriff, Undersheriff, and/or other members of executive staff respond to every OIS incident to acquire preliminary information about the shooting and scene. Thereafter, generally within 48 hours, Sheriff's Executive Staff receives a presentation by the Homicide Bureau and Professional Standards following their preliminary investigation into the OIS. Once both the criminal and administrative investigations are completed, a final presentation is given to Executive Staff. In addition to examining the officers' actions for each specific incident, the information from these presentations were evaluated by Executive Staff regarding behavior, policy, and tactical issues present that may require changes to policy or training within the Department. REFER ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT • P.O. BOX 988 • SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-0988 26 Honorable Laurie Earl August 29, 2013 Both the Department's Range Master and administrative investigative staff respond to all officer-involved shooting incidents to participate in the scene walk-through for training and investigative purposes. The information compiled is used to design firearm qualifications and training courses, note trends or commonalities, or identify training or policy deficiencies.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 2
The Grand Jury recommends the Sheriff consider restoring the use-of-force review process in the Department with a specific focus on the identification of behavior, policy, and tactical issues, and "lessons learned." The Grand Jury further recommends the review panel include both tactical and training staff.
F3 Page 2
The Grand Jury finds that there is insufficient communication between the Office of the Inspector General and the administration of the Sheriff's Department concerning the "lessons learned" from the shooting cases. Response to Finding 3: Concur The Sheriff's Department has notified the OIG immediately following every officer- involved shooting incident, allowing for response and participation in scene walk- throughs at the discretion of the OIG. The OIG is updated frequently during and at the completion of all officer-involved shooting investigations. Communicating "lessons learned" from officer-involved shooting incidents had not been previously identified as a goal of the OIG, but the OIG has unfettered access to the investigation and information contained therein at all times
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 2
The Grand Jury recommends that the Inspector General adopt a more proactive review of deputy-involved shooting incidents, beyond simply reviewing the findings of the Department's internal investigation. Rather, the Inspector General should review each incident with the goal of communicating "lessons learned" to the Department. Honorable Laurie Earl August 29, 2013
F4 Page 3
The Grand Jury finds the policies and orders of the SSD concerning use-of-force and deadly force are relatively generic and not comprehensive. Response to Finding 4: Concur While developing a Department-wide Use of Force update training course in 2012, the Sheriff's Department recognized these policies required review and revision.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Page 3
The Grand Jury recommends the Sheriff initiate a review of the orders and policies concerning the use-of-force and deadly force, and revise those orders as appropriate and legally competent to specifically address topics that are not addressed in the current policies (e.g., shooting at a moving vehicle). The Grand Jury further recommends the Sheriff consider the inclusion of use-of- force policy in tactical and firearms training courses developed and presented in the Department.

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.