San Mateo County Grand Jury • 2009-2010

City Fire Department Consolidations/Mergers Issue | Background | Findings | Conclusions | Recommendations | Responses |

Published: April 12, 2010 34 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 22 findings

F1
Consolidations were enabled by the implementation of the paramedic program which required boundary drop (closest fire engine responds regardless of the jurisdiction) and a single communication system for all San Mateo County fire departments.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Public safety (police and fire) expenditure is generally over half of the general fund in every community. 3
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The major cost of a fire department is the cost of personnel (salaries, health benefits and pension obligations). Table 3 below reports cost per capita as compared to the population supported. $825 180,000 $750 160,000 $675 140,000 $600 120,000 $525 $450 100,000 $375 80,000 $300 60,000 $225 40,000 $150 20,000 $75 $- - Wood- Belmont- So. San Redwood Colma side Millbrae Foster City Central Cty Coastside San Bruno San Carlos Francisco City San Mateo Menlo Pk No. County Population 5,600 16,000 21,536 30,429 39,553 40,000 42,000 54,500 60,552 76,000 92,482 94,650 155,000 Cost per Capita 372.40 769.02 215.18 263.08 404.24 132.49 187.04 255.77 272.00 219.21 206.15 282.68 148.00
No recommendations for this finding
F4
All fire departments have fixed overhead costs for administration and management regardless of the size of the department. Usually fire departments that support large populations are more cost effective because their fixed overhead is spread over a larger base. Table 35 above compares the cost per capita to the population supported. In general, the larger the population the lower the cost per capita. In addition to cost per capita, the cost to support a large geographical area should be considered when evaluating the cost efficiency of a department.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The investigation revealed that labor contract obligations were negotiated when tax revenues were higher and are generally no longer sustainable in today’s economic environment.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Consolidations were driven by the need to significantly reduce cost while maintaining the same level of service. The Grand Jury requested approved 2009-2010 budget information from all fire departments in the county. 4 atipaC reP tsoC noitalupoP San Mateo Fire Departments -Cost Per Capita & Population Table 3 Population Cost per Capita Trend -Cost/Capita
No recommendations for this finding
F7
North County Fire Authority, Central County Fire Department and the Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department each closed a fire station, reduced fire administration and the number of firefighters, over a period of three years.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Central County Fire achieved annual savings of approximately $3.4 million by consolidation. Over a four year period, 14 full time equivalent positions were eliminated for an annual savings of $3.3 million. In addition, approximately $100,000 was saved from equipment and vehicle reductions. (See Appendix A for complete analysis.)
No recommendations for this finding
F9
There continues to be a redundancy of fire stations with five situations where stations are located within 1-mile of each other. These stations were placed by the local jurisdictions to fight fires within their city boundaries at a time when “boundary drop” did not exist and fire departments only responded to fires and other emergencies within their designated boundaries. Table 4 below was reproduced from the “San Mateo County Fire Agency Consolidation Threshold Analysis” report of March 2004. Table 4 Stations Located within a 1-mile Proximity of Each Other Station City Service Provider 1801 DE ANZA BLVD. SAN MATEO CITY OF SAN MATEO 20 TOWER RD SAN MATEO CDF – SAN MATEO 1500 MARINA CT. SAN MATEO CITY OF SAN MATEO 1040 EAST HILLSDALE BLVD. FOSTER CITY FOSTER CITY 200 EDGEWOOD RD. REDWOOD CITY CDF-SAN MATEO 1280 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS SAN CARLOS SOUTH COUNTY JPA 4101 FAIR OAKS AVE MENLO PARK MENLO PARK FPD 1091 SECOND AVE. REDWOOD CITY REDWOOD CITY LAKE MERCED BLVD DALY CITY DALY CITY 50 REINER STREET COLMA COLMA FPD
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The 2004 average operating cost of a fire station in San Mateo County was approximately $2.0 million per year6. Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department reported that their average cost to run a fire station in 2009-2010 was approximately $3.2 million7. This is one indication of operating cost escalation.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
In spite of the significant savings resulting from consolidations in the Central and Belmont-San Carlos Fire Departments, the present condition of local agency budgets makes it difficult for fire agencies to sustain the current level of service. With the high cost of salaries, benefits and pension obligations, the San Carlos Fire budget has increased 19.5% over the last two fiscal years.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
Consolidation was made possible in the Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department, North County Fire Authority and the Central County Fire Department by the agreement of the city councils, city management, fire department management and firefighters union.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
The average workweek of a firefighter in the Coastside Fire Protection District and other Cal Fire managed stations is 72 hours (56 hours at regular pay and 16 hours of mandatory overtime at time and a half). The average work week of a firefighter in all other San Mateo County Fire Departments is 56 hours per week. Table 8 of the “The San Mateo County Threshold Analysis Report” of 2004, commissioned by the San Mateo County Fire Chief’s Association. San Carlos Staff Report of March 13, 2010, ” Overview of Initial Cal Fire Letter Proposal to Provide Fire Services in San Carlos” 5
No recommendations for this finding
F14
The difference in work hours enables Cal Fire to staff an engine with 7 firefighters per week compared to 9 firefighters per week where fire departments have a 56 hour work week.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
Cal Fire is a statewide agency with lower rates for salaries, workmen’s compensation insurance, health benefits and pension costs.
No recommendations for this finding
F16
The cost to run a Cal Fire station in the Coastside Fire Protection District is approximately $1.9 million annually. City of San Carlos estimates annual savings of between $1.2 million and $2.0 million if it contracted with Cal Fire.8
No recommendations for this finding
F17
As a result of consolidation, the Central County Fire Department and the Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department firefighters now each have single collective bargaining agreements. The North County Fire Department firefighters do not have a single collective bargaining agreement but maintain separate agreements with their respective cities.
No recommendations for this finding
F18
The fire departments of San Mateo County are first responders to all fire and medical emergencies.
No recommendations for this finding
F19
Approximately 60% of fire agency calls are for medical emergencies and are responded to by the closest available fire engine with three firefighters, one of whom is a paramedic.9
No recommendations for this finding
F20
The Advanced Life Support (ALS) JPA requires a paramedic on the responding fire engine and a paramedic on the responding ambulance.
No recommendations for this finding
F21
Except for South San Francisco, paramedic ambulance service is provided by AMR which is a private-for-profit ambulance service under contract to San Mateo County and administered through the ALS JPA.
No recommendations for this finding
F22
Through fees paid by patients and/or their insurers, AMR (ambulance provider), pays $3.7 million per year to the JPA, to help offset the fire department costs. From that $3.7 million, the JPA disperses $2.7 million per year to cities and fire districts who are members of the JPA. The remaining $1.0 million is retained by the JPA for administration and other costs. Conclusions: The 2009-2010 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury concludes that:
No recommendations for this finding

Conclusions 9

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Woodside Fire Protection District Fire District