San Mateo County Grand Jury
• 2009-2010
City Fire Department Consolidations/Mergers Issue | Background | Findings | Conclusions | Recommendations | Responses |
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 22 findings
F1
Consolidations were enabled by the implementation of the paramedic program which required boundary drop (closest fire engine responds regardless of the jurisdiction) and a single communication system for all San Mateo County fire departments.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Public safety (police and fire) expenditure is generally over half of the general fund in every community. 3
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The major cost of a fire department is the cost of personnel (salaries, health benefits and pension obligations). Table 3 below reports cost per capita as compared to the population supported. $825 180,000 $750 160,000 $675 140,000 $600 120,000 $525 $450 100,000 $375 80,000 $300 60,000 $225 40,000 $150 20,000 $75 $- - Wood- Belmont- So. San Redwood Colma side Millbrae Foster City Central Cty Coastside San Bruno San Carlos Francisco City San Mateo Menlo Pk No. County Population 5,600 16,000 21,536 30,429 39,553 40,000 42,000 54,500 60,552 76,000 92,482 94,650 155,000 Cost per Capita 372.40 769.02 215.18 263.08 404.24 132.49 187.04 255.77 272.00 219.21 206.15 282.68 148.00
No recommendations for this finding
F4
All fire departments have fixed overhead costs for administration and management regardless of the size of the department. Usually fire departments that support large populations are more cost effective because their fixed overhead is spread over a larger base. Table 35 above compares the cost per capita to the population supported. In general, the larger the population the lower the cost per capita. In addition to cost per capita, the cost to support a large geographical area should be considered when evaluating the cost efficiency of a department.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The investigation revealed that labor contract obligations were negotiated when tax revenues were higher and are generally no longer sustainable in today’s economic environment.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Consolidations were driven by the need to significantly reduce cost while maintaining the same level of service. The Grand Jury requested approved 2009-2010 budget information from all fire departments in the county. 4 atipaC reP tsoC noitalupoP San Mateo Fire Departments -Cost Per Capita & Population Table 3 Population Cost per Capita Trend -Cost/Capita
No recommendations for this finding
F7
North County Fire Authority, Central County Fire Department and the Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department each closed a fire station, reduced fire administration and the number of firefighters, over a period of three years.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Central County Fire achieved annual savings of approximately $3.4 million by consolidation. Over a four year period, 14 full time equivalent positions were eliminated for an annual savings of $3.3 million. In addition, approximately $100,000 was saved from equipment and vehicle reductions. (See Appendix A for complete analysis.)
No recommendations for this finding
F9
There continues to be a redundancy of fire stations with five situations where stations are located within 1-mile of each other. These stations were placed by the local jurisdictions to fight fires within their city boundaries at a time when “boundary drop” did not exist and fire departments only responded to fires and other emergencies within their designated boundaries. Table 4 below was reproduced from the “San Mateo County Fire Agency Consolidation Threshold Analysis” report of March 2004. Table 4 Stations Located within a 1-mile Proximity of Each Other Station City Service Provider 1801 DE ANZA BLVD. SAN MATEO CITY OF SAN MATEO 20 TOWER RD SAN MATEO CDF – SAN MATEO 1500 MARINA CT. SAN MATEO CITY OF SAN MATEO 1040 EAST HILLSDALE BLVD. FOSTER CITY FOSTER CITY 200 EDGEWOOD RD. REDWOOD CITY CDF-SAN MATEO 1280 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS SAN CARLOS SOUTH COUNTY JPA 4101 FAIR OAKS AVE MENLO PARK MENLO PARK FPD 1091 SECOND AVE. REDWOOD CITY REDWOOD CITY LAKE MERCED BLVD DALY CITY DALY CITY 50 REINER STREET COLMA COLMA FPD
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The 2004 average operating cost of a fire station in San Mateo County was approximately $2.0 million per year6. Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department reported that their average cost to run a fire station in 2009-2010 was approximately $3.2 million7. This is one indication of operating cost escalation.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
In spite of the significant savings resulting from consolidations in the Central and Belmont-San Carlos Fire Departments, the present condition of local agency budgets makes it difficult for fire agencies to sustain the current level of service. With the high cost of salaries, benefits and pension obligations, the San Carlos Fire budget has increased 19.5% over the last two fiscal years.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
Consolidation was made possible in the Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department, North County Fire Authority and the Central County Fire Department by the agreement of the city councils, city management, fire department management and firefighters union.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
The average workweek of a firefighter in the Coastside Fire Protection District and other Cal Fire managed stations is 72 hours (56 hours at regular pay and 16 hours of mandatory overtime at time and a half). The average work week of a firefighter in all other San Mateo County Fire Departments is 56 hours per week. Table 8 of the “The San Mateo County Threshold Analysis Report” of 2004, commissioned by the San Mateo County Fire Chief’s Association. San Carlos Staff Report of March 13, 2010, ” Overview of Initial Cal Fire Letter Proposal to Provide Fire Services in San Carlos” 5
No recommendations for this finding
F14
The difference in work hours enables Cal Fire to staff an engine with 7 firefighters per week compared to 9 firefighters per week where fire departments have a 56 hour work week.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
Cal Fire is a statewide agency with lower rates for salaries, workmen’s compensation insurance, health benefits and pension costs.
No recommendations for this finding
F16
The cost to run a Cal Fire station in the Coastside Fire Protection District is approximately $1.9 million annually. City of San Carlos estimates annual savings of between $1.2 million and $2.0 million if it contracted with Cal Fire.8
No recommendations for this finding
F17
As a result of consolidation, the Central County Fire Department and the Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department firefighters now each have single collective bargaining agreements. The North County Fire Department firefighters do not have a single collective bargaining agreement but maintain separate agreements with their respective cities.
No recommendations for this finding
F18
The fire departments of San Mateo County are first responders to all fire and medical emergencies.
No recommendations for this finding
F19
Approximately 60% of fire agency calls are for medical emergencies and are responded to by the closest available fire engine with three firefighters, one of whom is a paramedic.9
No recommendations for this finding
F20
The Advanced Life Support (ALS) JPA requires a paramedic on the responding fire engine and a paramedic on the responding ambulance.
No recommendations for this finding
F21
Except for South San Francisco, paramedic ambulance service is provided by AMR which is a private-for-profit ambulance service under contract to San Mateo County and administered through the ALS JPA.
No recommendations for this finding
F22
Through fees paid by patients and/or their insurers, AMR (ambulance provider), pays $3.7 million per year to the JPA, to help offset the fire department costs. From that $3.7 million, the JPA disperses $2.7 million per year to cities and fire districts who are members of the JPA. The remaining $1.0 million is retained by the JPA for administration and other costs. Conclusions: The 2009-2010 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury concludes that:
No recommendations for this finding
Conclusions 9
-
CL1 Page 52. Include an effective dispute resolution processes in all consolidation agreements. 7 APPENDIX A CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE SCHEDULE OF SAVINGS (PER YEAR) FROM BURLINGAME/HILLSBOROUGH FIRE MERGER SWORN PERSONNEL COSTS: Savings FY 02/03 FY 09/10 Valued @ Authorized Positions (Before Merge) Authorized Positions (Current) Positions Current Savings Breakdown Burlingame Hillsborough Total Burlingame Hillsborough Total Eliminated Salaries Burlingame Hillsborough Fire Chief 1 1 2 1 1 1 $ 333,427 - 1 Deputy Chief 1 1 1 1 - - - Assistant Chief (1) 4 4 - 4 4 - Division Chief (1) - 1 1 (1) 857,412 (5) ( 1) - Fire Marshal (1) 1 1 1 1 - - - Deputy Fire Marshal (3) 2 2 - 2 518,546 (6) 2 - Battalion Chief 3 3 2 2 4 (1) (283,600) ( 2) 1 Mechanic 1 1 1 1 - - - Fire Inspectors (2) 1 1 2 2 (1) Wash ( 2) 1 Administrative Captain (2) - 1 1 (1) Wash ( 1) - Captain (2) 12 9 2 1 10 9 1 9 2 Wash 2 - Firefighters/Paramedics (4) 29 2 1 5 0 24 1 7 4 1 9 1,855,188 (7) 5 4 Total 50 3 6 8 6 43 2 9 7 2 14 $ 3,280,973 7 7 1) These positions are at the same salary level. 2) These positions are at the same salary level. 3) Eliminated Deputy Fire Marshal position computed @ 90% of Fire Marshal position 4) Currently, each city has one vacant Firefighter position. 5) 3 positions @ $285,804 each 6) 2 positions @ $259,273 7) 9 positions @ $206,132 ALL OTHERS: 1 Fire Engine @ $400,000 with 15 years useful life $ 26,667 Tools associated with 1 fire engine @ $75,000 over 15 years useful life 5,000 Maintenance costs associated with 1 fire engine 20,000 Protective equipment with 5 year replacement @ $2,200 each (11 sets) 4,840 Training costs 14 @ $1,200 each 16,800 Total - All Others $ 73,307 GRAND TOTAL OF SAVINGS PER YEAR $ 3,354,280 ALLOCATION FACTORS 60% 40% SAVINGS ALLOCATION $ 2,012,568 $ 1,341,712 City of Millbrae PAUL SET0 Mayor DANIEL F. QUPGG 62 1 Magnolia Avenue, Millbrae, CA 94030 Vice Mayor MARGE COLAPPETRO Councilwoman I July 27,20 1 0 GINA PAPAN Councilwoman NADIA V. HOLOBER Honorable Clifford V. Cretan Councilwoman Judge of the Superior Court @all of Justice, 400 County Center, 2"*F loor Redwood City, CA 94063 Dear Judge Cretan: I am writing to you on behalf of the Millbrae City Council. This letter will serve as the City of Millbrae's formal response to the May 26,2010 letter from the Superior Court transmitting the report from the Civil Grand Jury with regard to "City Fire Department Consolidations/Mergers." The Millbrae City Council reviewed and approved this response at its meeting on July 27, 2010. The City of Millbrae appreciates the opportunity to respond to your report. The report is well organized and highlights the primary issues surrounding consolidation/merger efforts. The Grand Jury investigation focused on the four consolidations that have occurred in the county. Table 2 also defines the different relationships that can occur without necessarily having a full consolidation. Discussions of mergers in San Mateo County have been occurring on and off for the past 20 years. The economic downturn certainly provides an incentive for municipalities and districts to pursue cost reduction measures, but fire service in this county has certainly pursued shared services opportunities, joint equipment purchases, consolidated dispatch services, and engaged in a publiclprivate relationship with the ambulance provider. The City of Millbrae has entered into at least four merger discussions with its neighboring agencies in the past. For one reason or another, whether it was the economic conditions, the political climate, or an outstanding issue that could not be resolved, these efforts did not come to fruition. Although the report recommends agencies such as Millbrae consider consolidation efforts, it is not as simple as it sounds. There are numerous issues, such as governess models, payroll, insurance, labor issues, parity, and station closures that create and contribute to the complexity. Each of those issues alone may have solutions, but taken together these issues make the process long and tedious. Nevertheless, the City of Millbrae has continued its efforts to achieve shared fire service arrangements and potential consolidations. Currently, the City of Millbrae and the City of San Bruno share Fire Chief and Battalion Chief services for a credible amount of savings to each agency. Millbrae, San Bruno, Central County Fire, and San Mateo share a training staff between the four agencies that eliminates the need for each agency to dedicate a single resource to the training program. Millbrae, San Bruno, and Central County Fire are currently having an implementation analysis done by a consultant to confirm merger opportunities. City CounciUCity Manager City Clerk Public WorksfEngineering Recreation Police Department (650) 259-2334 (650) 259-2334 (650) 259-2339 (650) 259-2360 (650) 259-2300 Personnel FinancelWater Conlmunity Development Building Division Fire Department (650) 259-2334 (650) 259-2350 (650) 259-2341 (650) 259-2330 24%8?8f 9-2400 In summary, the Grand Jury recommendations do have validity, but the report needs to recognize that consolidations/mergers are complex and require the alignment of economic, labor, and political factors. Our own experience leads us to believe that the provision of fire services on an independent agency basis over the long term is cost prohibitive. We do agree that a dispute resolution process needs to be in place, but that is no guarantee that there will not be conflict between agencies even in the best of times. The example of the San Carlos - Relmont quandary certainly demonstrates that these relationships are not easy and to unravel them leads to additional complexities. Again, thank you for the opportunity to respond to your report; I trust you will find our comments helpful. ?& % Paul Seto Mayor cc: City Council City Manager
-
CL2 Page 6The process of fire department consolidation is greatly simplified because of the San Mateo County “boundary drop” provision in the Advanced Life Support JPA. Fire departments within San Mateo County function operationally as a single county wide fire department. 8 San Carlos Staff Report of March 13, 2010, ” Overview of Initial Cal Fire Letter Proposal to Provide Fire Services in San Carlos” 9 Chart provided by San Mateo County Public Safety Communications Center – Annual Statistics 2009 6
-
CL3 Page 7Successful consolidations require the support of the key stakeholders: city councils, city managers, fire management, firefighters, fire union and the community.
-
CL4 Page 7Cities that have consolidated fire departments have realized significant cost savings while maintaining the same level of services. This has been accomplished through personnel attrition, the closing of fire stations, and the reduction of fire management positions.
-
CL5 Page 7Many cities and fire districts, including those who have consolidated, may find it difficult to sustain the current levels of service due to revenue shortfalls associated with the current economy and the obligations to salary, health benefits and pension costs.
-
CL6 Page 7Jurisdictions who contract with Cal Fire realize significant savings in salaries, workmen’s compensation rate, pension and health benefit contributions.
-
CL7 Page 7The merged JPA agreement of Belmont-San Carlos Fire has equal representation from each jurisdiction. Because there is no effective dispute resolution process in place, management decision making regarding cost sharing and other matters is slow and at times contentious.
-
CL8 Page 7The implementation of mergers can be accomplished prior to agreement on each and every administrative detail such as personnel, payroll and workers compensation procedures.
-
CL9 Page 7The cities of San Bruno, Millbrae, Foster City, San Mateo, Redwood City and the Colma and Woodside Fire Protection District have opportunities to significantly reduce the cost of services to taxpayers by aggressively pursuing consolidations and mergers.
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Woodside Fire Protection District
Fire District