Los Angeles County Grand Jury • 1970-1971 • Agency Response

Final Report 1970*

Published: ∼ June 30, 1970 74 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 6 findings

F1
early adequate education for prevention
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Those letters which can be answered easily and with little delay should be completed ed immediately.
F2
early, sustained corrective treatment for the offender
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Those complaints which need further investigation and for which no quick answer was ·e possible will be sent a letter acknowledging receipt and proposed action. Some letters were summarized to the whole jury if the content seemed to justify this procedure. A few of the letters resulted in considerable discussion as to the best procedure to follow. Many were not within Grand Jury responsibility and were referred to other authority. To expedite action on the letters, the committee received excellent assistance from the office staff, ct legal advisor and investigator. They were diligent and objective in giving counsel and advice to committee members. Gerald A. Calhoun, Chairman, Criminal Complaints Committee Approved by Grand Jury November 30, 1970 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL COMMITTEE REPORT Standing: Addison Quarles Lloyd Dickey Dan Donohue Turner Alexander Seated: Christine Mather Lucille Deasy, Secretary Ray Dodds, Chairman Patricia Krogstad Voris Marker For several years, a Smog Committee has been a part of each Los Angeles County Grand Jury This committee has attended a hearing before the Los Angeles Zoning Commission in regard to noise at International Airport. The committee was represented at the Mayor of Los Angeles Anti- pollution Conference. A meeting was held with Mr. Fuller just prior to his retirement as head of the Air Pollution Control District. A tour of the Long Beach and San Pedro Harbors in the city-owned launch, "Angelina", was made by the committee. An investigation into the chemistry of detergents was begun by a special task force and continued by the committee. It was learned that all detergents made in the United States since 1965 are biode- gradable. They break down in the sewage disposal plant into such components as to reduce the con- tamination of the bodies of water into which they flow. There is a difference of opinion as to the results in home cesspools. The Grand Jury took no affirmative action concerning the committee's resolution against oil drilling in San Pedro Harbor; it endorsed the committee's opinion that California should take part in the civil suit against the major automobile manufacturers, claiming collusion to prevent cleaner running engines. Letters concerning this action were sent to Governor Reagan and Attorney General Thomas J. Lynch. The committee has recognized that there is no simple answer to the problems of environmental control. Its hope is to help disseminate the basic truth that the so-called CONSUMER does not exist – there are only USERS. Nothing is ever destroyed, it only changes in form; the waste material is usually equivalent in volume to the original product. This is strikingly demonstrated by the old automobiles that clutter the It's a small world; all the extractive industries are working on an exhaustible supply. It is our plan and purpose to help set the processes of recycling and recovery in motion. On August 24th the Environmental Control Committee did another inspection of the harbors, this time as guests of the Los Angeles City Fire Department aboard a Fire Boat. In addition to the crew, who was very cooperative and informative, Mr. Roy Hampson of the State Water Quality Control Board was along to point out the factors that contribute to the problem. It was a pleasure to hear him say that their efforts had met with considerable success. The best evidence is that the water will again support some fish and animal life. Anchovies and seals have returned to the harbor and are present in considerable quantities. However, he pointed out a number of sources of pollution which indicated that their job is not complete. It seemed evident that a satisfactory patrol of the harbors and coast of the County, with the numerous sources of possible pollution, requires more than the two assigned to the task. The committee wrote to the Director to that effect. Consistent with the committee's previous position of opposing oil drilling in San Pedro Harbor, a state- ment was issued opposing exploratory core-hole drilling at Pacific Palisades Beach. With the approval of the Grand Jury, statements of this opinion were sent to the Board of Zoning Appeals and other interested parties. In pursuance of the subject of oil pollution, it was learned that Los Angeles City Ordinances allow an exploratory core-drilling permit without a public hearing. They also require that only owners of prop- erty within 300 feet of the site shall be notified. A recent change in the administrative rules of the City Department of Building and Safety requires an interested citizen to deposit $1,000 in cash or cashier's check and pay $20.00 per hour — minimum fee $20.00 - for the privilege of examining and drawing or blueprint on file. It is even being applied to plot plans. Both of these matters are, in the opinion of the committee, detrimental to the public welfare and the public knowledge so necessary to environmental control. All involved and interested parties have been so advised. Mr. Robert Chass, the new head of APCD, accepted the invitation to address the Grand Jury on Thurs- day, November 5. In reviewing the year, it seems that contributions toward improving the environment were miniscule. The committee hopes that it has aroused a few more people to the size and urgency of the problem, and that future Grand Juries will see the need to continue this task. RECOMMENDATIONS 1) A strong and sustained program should be instituted to educate people to the advan- tages of living near their work. The establishment of communities by industries could be a part of the plan.
F3
stiff enforcement of laws to get the seller for profit out of circulation and off the streets
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
That there be an annual management audit of the county which would reveal inefficiencies, waste and duplications not brought to light by the bookkeeping audit currently provided for by Statute. (See 1970 Grand Jury Contract Auditors Report.) 4) That when civil service salaries are set to be on a par with private, corporate salaries, such comparisons allow fully for the additional work security and other benefits accompanying civil service employment. Turner Alexander Catherine Corbin Curtis L. Mick Accepted by Grand Jury November 18, 1970 GRAND JURY FEES The three-member Task Force on Grand Jury fees investigated the present per diem ($10.00) in relation to present-day inflation, federal grand jury fees, and its historical purpose. The Task Force recommended and the Grand Jury accepted the following motion: "The 1970 Grand Jury recommends to the Board of Supervisors an amendment to the appropriate statute increasing the fee for grand jurors from $10.00 to $20.00 for each day's attendance." Lloyd Dickey, Chairman Daniel Donohue Don C. Seare Accepted by the Grand Jury September 28, 1970 GRAND JURY - GENERAL CONCERN This three-member Task Force researched, studied, and investigated the statutory and administrative provisions for the selecting, nominating, and installing the Los Angeles County Grand Jury. Further, it acted upon pending and anticipated legislation relative to holdover jurors (AB 197). The Grand Jury accepted the following report and motions on recommendations of this Task Force: 1) That the State Legislature and Governor be advised of this Grand Jury's opposition to AB 197 - three holdover grand jurors to be chosen by the presiding judge of the Superior Court for service on next year's jury. (The Governor vetoed this bill) 2) That the two drawings for grand jurors each year be advanced by one month (time of assuming duties not to be changed). Thus the final twenty-three jurors would be drawn the first Tuesday in December giving each juror time to study the necessary materials and re-arrange his schedule. 3) That the "Charge to the Grand Jury" be revised annually so as to contain the latest statutory provisions, and that all statutory
F4
regulation and control of production, distribution, importation of dangerous drugs and narcotics
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
An annual audit of the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association's financial statements is performed by the Auditor-Controller's Audit Division. The audit includes a test count of securities held by the County Treasurer for the Retire- ment Association. However, no frequent test counts are made of the securities held by the Treasurer for the Los Angeles Unified or Los Angeles Junior College retirement funds. We believe the Auditor-Controller should periodically review and test the custodial functions performed by the Treasurer for these school district retirement funds. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE: Suggestions A) A standard format should be adopted so that all departments and institutions report the same kind of information to the Auditor-Controller. B) The information reported should include the name of the debtor, the name of the account receivable, the aging of the amount receivable, the classification (nature) of the receivable, and space for comments relating to its collectibility. C) Clear deadlines must be established and enforced for receipt of the accounts receivable information in the Auditor-Controller's office and a policy adopted whereby each depart- ment must submit a report. D) Procedures must be established to insure that all departments have included in their accounts receivable:
F5
Identify groups whose tasks are really carried out, or should be, by county or other governmental units.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The inventory activity reports prepared by Mechanical should be quarterly rather than annually so that action can be taken in a timely manner.
F6
Re-evaluate the need-effectiveness-cost of the groups." On November 15, 1967, "the CAO was instructed to periodically review the Board-appointed committees and commissions and report the results . . . to the members of the Board for their consideration." The CAO advised the 1968 \bar{G}rand Jury Audit Committee that" . . . we have made initial contact with 18 committees, . . ." and that "we plan to complete our review by September 30, 1969." In September 1970, the CAO wrote to the 1970 Contract Auditor that "...a limited amount of activity with regard to county commissions and committees has taken place since our last correspondence to you on November 18, 1968." The Contract Auditor advised this Audit Committee of the "limited progress in the making of periodic reviews and evaluations of these groups." From the lists supplied by the CAO, the Contract Auditor reports that: "1) Two commissions have been combined into one.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
We believe it incorrect to omit hospital inventories from County financial LAND, STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS AND EQUIPMENT: Corrective and Improvement Actions Suggested

Additional Recommendations 9

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.