Sutter County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

Final Report of the 2015-2016 Sutter County Grand Jury Pursuant to Penal Code 933(a) on Subject - Pension Enhancements - a Case of Government Code Violations and a Lack of Transparency

Published: May 27, 2016 10 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 3 findings

F2
The BOS violated GC Section 23O26 by placing the item which etrhanced pension benefits on the Consent Calendar instead of"as an item ofbusiness."
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The BOS de.signarc that the Auditor-Controller develop written quarterly reports for the public to view as to the financial security ofthe County's pension fund.
F3
The BOS refused to remove this highly controversial issue from the Consent Calendar when requested to do so by the Sutter County Auditor-Contoller.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The BOS employ an intemal auditor, by the next fiscal year, to ensure that the County is in firll coryliance with Federal & State law and County Policy & Procedures.
F4
The BOS removed a safeguard that was desiped to fiscally protect the citizens of Sutter County by refusing the Sutter County Auditor-Controller's request to bring the enhanced benefits package forward for public review and further shdy. RECOMTENDATIOilS . Rl The BOS develop, adopt and implement policy and procedures, including stafl training, to prevent firture violations of the California Government Code.
No recommendations for this finding

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Sutter County Auditor-Controller Elected County Office
Sutter County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office