Contra Costa County Grand Jury
• 2011-2012
A Report by the 2011-2012 Contra Costa County Grand Jury
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F2
Evaluations that do not include feedback regarding the quality of performance are not useful to employees.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Board of Supervisors should direct that these reviews be based upon the five key processes identified in the State's Employee Performance Management Cycle.
F3
The performance evaluation process already in place in the Clerk-Recorder/Elections Department could provide lessons and guidance as to what practices are effective.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The Board of Supervisors should assign responsibility for tracking annual performance reviews.
F4
Contrary to the beliefs held by some County managers, numerous methods exist to recognize and thereby motivate employees aside from monetary remuneration.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Because there is no process for sharing performance management initiatives and experiences between departments, the County may not be getting the benefits of lessons learned.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The County can use the State's Employee Performance Management Cycle as a model for a performance evaluation program. Contra Costa County Grand Jury Report 1214
No recommendations for this finding
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office