📋

Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Placer County Grand Jury • 2023-2024

Placer County Grand Jury 2023-2024 Final Report Video Evidence Sequence of Events (continued)

Published: July 08, 2023 14 pages

View PDF View Full Original

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings 6 findings

The classification decision tree does not consider the charges filed against the inmate.

F2 Page 37

the inmate. The one-deputy escort of Abril was based on the classification decision tree, which did not consider the seriousness of the charges or the potential

F3 Page 37

sent ence those charges carried. ThePlacer County Sheriff’s Office provides no formal training for

F4 Page 37

transporting an inmate to a location or for observing a hospitalized inmate.

F5 Page 37

The expense to taxpayers of Placer County was over $109,000. . The deputy’s complacency and violations of policies and procedures, which allowed a violent felon to escape, put the public, fellow law enforcement,

F6 Page 37

medical staff, and patients at risk. The radius of Everbridge/Placer Alert system notifications did not cover the Recomenmtiree nsoduathti oPlnacse r region. RTh1e. grand jury recommends: By October 1, 2024, the classification decision tree be modified to include additional factors as set forth in the Scott Jones, Esq. report. This should include charges an inmate is facing and the potential sentence range assuming conviction, including sentencing enhancements, and pending out-

Recommendations 3

R1

By October 1, 2024, the classification decision tree be modified to include additional factors as set forth in the Scott Jones, Esq. report. This should include charges an inmate is facing and the potential sentence range assuming conviction, including sentencing enhancements, and pending out- of-county charges.
R2
Page 37

of-county charges. By October 1, 2024, the Placer County Sheriff’s Office will require command staff approval prior to any reclassification of any inmate currently charged with an aggravated felonies pursuant to Penal Code § 1192.7(c). 29 -2024 Final Report
R3
Page 38

By January 1, 2025, the Placer County Sheriff’s Office will develop a curriculum and commence a formal training program for Placer County deputies for out of custodial facility transportation and monitoring duties, Requiprreiodr Rtoe dseppuotny sasessig nment, which includes hands-on, practical training. Pursuant to Penal Code § 933.05, the Placer County Grand Jury requires a response frRoems pthoen dfoilnlogw Einntgi tgyo verning F binoddiyn: g s Recommendations Due Date Requiring Requiring Response Response Sheriff Wayne Woo F1, F2, F3, R1, R2, R3 September 3,