Sonoma County Grand Jury
• 2024-2025
• Agency Response
Response to:
Management Review a Beginning, not an End
Read and Considered*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F6
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F4
Page 2
Permit Sonoma is not able to factually report permit review and approval throughput because its workflow tracking systems are not capturing data on a consistent and reportable basis. We disagree with this finding. Permit Sonoma has completed an update to its dashboard that includes built-in workflow tracking based on AB 2234 (2022) deadlines, including warnings for permits that are in jeopardy of missing the required timeline. This dashboard is displayed in the office and on the department's intranet page.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Page 2
Permit Sonoma has made excellent plans to implement all of the Berry Dunn management review recommendations, but its reports overstate the actual progress observed by the Civil Grand Jury. We partially disagree with this finding. Permit Sonoma worked extensively with the consultant team at BerryDunn on the recommendations in the final BerryDunn report. The report was intended to result in meaningful process improvements for customers. Permit Sonoma achieved the goals of the report by using resources as efficiently as possible, and prioritized achieving process improvement results rather than documenting internal steps toward attainment of those results.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Page 3
By December 19, 2025, Permit Sonoma shall review and publish its requirements and expectations for express permit review and approval, third party plan check, permit and inspection self-certification, and use of program management techniques to fulfill all Berry <b>Dunn Report recommendations</b> Partial implementation: By December 19, 2025, Permit Sonoma shall review and publish its requirements and expectations for express permit review and approval, third party plan check, permit and inspection self-certification. This recommendation either requires more analysis or will not be implemented: Use of program management techniques to fulfill all Berry Dunn Report recommendations by December 19, 2025. By December 19, 2025, Permit Sonoma will assess the Initiatives not covered in other recommendations that the Grand Jury has found to be incomplete.
F7
Page 2
Other than compliance with California Assembly Bill 2234 (2022), Permit Sonoma senior management has not established objective expectations for staff performance regarding plan review or timely permit issuance. We partially disagree with this finding. Permit Sonoma agrees that objective expectations are an important aspect of organization efficiency, particularly for compliance with regulatory processing timelines and conformance with adopted fee studies. However, not all processes or permits can be reduced to quantitative expectations for individual staff performance that can be applied equally across the department. For example, staff that focus on complex discretionary projects such as visitor serving commercial uses or subdivisions with significant environmental constraints are going to have different work product expectations from staff that process intake for ministerial permits or perform field inspections.
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.