📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Placer County Grand Jury • 2008-2009

Final Report 2008–2009 Grand Jury On the blacktop courtyard were several 10’ x 10’ chain link pens. Later, in response

Published: June 16, 2009 6 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 2 findings

F1 Page 99
In compliance with Penal Code Section 919(b) the Grand Jury inspected the Juvenile Detention Facility and found it to be clean and well maintained.
F2 Page 99
The Grand Jury is concerned that the JDF has placed too low a priority on installation of additional surveillance cameras with recording devices, because: a. Little or no progress has been made toward the effort to procure and install the cameras in the facility, b. JDF officials appeared not to know the process by which to procure the surveillance cameras and equipment, c. JDF officials gave inaccurate statements in their response to the 2007–2008 Grand Jury Final Report by indicating bids had been received, funds allocated, and the cameras would be installed by June 2009, and d. Because the CP1 form had not been completed by April, the installation of cameras cannot be completed by the intended June 2009 date.

Recommendations 2

Conclusions 1