San Joaquin County Grand Jury
• 2004-2005
Case #1804 City of Stockton Community Development Department Permit and Plan Check Fees Reason for Investigation:
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F1
Builders today may be paying excessive fees for combination permits and plan checking because of a misinterpretation made in 2001. This misinterpretation has generated more than $40,000,000 during the past five fiscal years.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The $40,000,000 surplus that has been transferred to the General Fund and has not been reinvested in the Community Development Department or the Building Division to support its needs.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Stockton City Council did approve the permit fee increase in 2001 (resolution 01- 0279). The Grand Jury finds that the fee increase was owed to a misinterpretation of the fee schedule document. This misinterpretation was used as the study (analysis) required for the city council to approve the fee increase.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
The City of Stockton, with justification from the former Interim City Attorney and the City Auditor, may be charging more than the cost to provide service for combination and plan checking fees. This has allowed the City of Stockton to use the Building Division as a source of revenue and may violate California Health and Safety Code '17951 and California Government Code '66014.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The Grand Jury finds that the actual cost to provide service for the Building Division has not been determined. The actual cost to provide service must include the Building Division’s budget in addition to other support costs provided by other city departments.
No recommendations for this finding