2016-2017_complete_final_report*

The Grand Jury determined that Placer County is meeting the requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Grand Jury concludes that there is some room for improvement that could help citizens more easily find information on how to submit a request for public records. The Grand Jury also concludes that there are IT systems improvements that could help the County monitor how many requests they are receiving and how well they are complying with the law. Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report

The Grand Jury concludes that the 190,550 ballots cast in Placer County in the 2016 General Election were processed and tabulated in a professional manner. Placer County's Clerk-Recorder-Registrar of Voters and his staff are to be commended for their hard work and diligence in conducting the 2016 General Election. Elections staff is also to be commended for their diligent efforts to reduce USPS delivery delays of election materials and receipt of ballots. All VBM ballots cannot be processed for release at 8:00 pm on Election Day. However, the number of unprocessed VBM ballots could be reduced, thereby providing the public with more complete election results when the polls close. Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report Recommendations: The Grand Jury makes the following recommendations: R1. Placer County Elections staff continue to work with the USPS to develop alternatives to improve the timely delivery of election mail to all Placer County voters. R2. Placer County Elections staff continue to work with the USPS to develop alternatives to improve the timely receipt of VBM ballots in Placer County. R3. Elections management review and revise processes, equipment needs, and staffing patterns to improve the percentage of VBM ballots processed prior to poll closure on Election Day. R4. Placer County Elections expand the number of VBM drop-off locations. Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report Request for Responses:

The 2014 report provided by Dr. Robert Marbut concluded that there should be homeless shelters in Placer County operating 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, providing shelter and services for men and women in need. The BOS established a temporary shelter at the DeWitt Center, overcoming zoning issues with a temporary Site Access Agreement. The operation of the shelter could not be continued without a change in zoning. By adding Heavy Commercial zone district to the zones permitted for emergency shelters, the BOS is able to extend review of the Conditional Use Permit for a shelter at the DeWitt Center beyond the March 31, 2017 termination date for the Temporary Conditional Use Permit. On May 10, 2017 the BOS voted to extend the conditional use permit to allow continued operation of the temporary homeless shelter in the DeWitt Center for up to 5 additional years. While the need for emergency shelter for homeless men and women remains relatively undisputed, the physical location of such a facility has been a point of contention. The BOS vote on expanded zone districts for emergency shelters is a first step toward a long-term solution. The emergency shelter at the DeWitt Center has been repeatedly designated as a temporary facility.

Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report

There are strong opinions on both sides surrounding the City of Lincoln's decision not to release documents pertaining to the resignation of the Lincoln Police Chief. 3 Lincoln News Messenger article dated July 25, 2016. Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report The Grand Jury has exercised its authority to review documents not accessible to the media or the general public. Based on this review, the Grand Jury accepts that the City of Lincoln properly exercised its discretion to accept the Chief's resignation. The Grand Jury accepts the City of Lincoln's decision to refuse to release the list of LPOA grievances and the independent investigation of the Chief. It is unclear why the City of Lincoln has refused to release to the public the Settlement Agreement negotiated between the City and the Chief. The Grand Jury recognizes that there are differing opinions on this and points out that the Superior Court could make a final determination. The Grand Jury notes that a request for a court order has not been filed by any party in this case. Further, the Grand Jury does not take a position on whether or not a request for a court order would be successful in this situation. It is the Grand Jury's opinion that the City of Lincoln should make every effort to be more transparent with its citizens.

The Placer County Sheriff's Department and the Department of Health and Human Services consider the health and welfare of inmates a top priority. Although there were many bidders, CFMG has been awarded the contract for the past 23 years and is considered to be competent. Sheriff's Department personnel continuously train to recognize the symptoms of mental illness. Despite the burdens placed on jail personnel, they work diligently to innovate and implement programs to help the inmates. When inmates are released, they're given treatment plans and prescriptions as needed. However, they are no longer under the supervision of the jail staff and may opt not to take the medications or take advantage of available resources. Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report

The Grand Jury commends the Placer County Office of Education administration. PCOE has been proactive in gathering information from parents and teachers as well as making site visits to improve the future conditions of the 55 students in the special needs program in Placer County. With the decision to move forward with the sale of the Kentucky Greens property, the extensive plan will benefit all parties involved and provide long-term special needs education in updated facilities. The Grand Jury commends the Board of Education and the Placer County Office of Education for their collaborative work.

The RPD Abandoned Vehicle Program must yield precedence to solving crimes and the many other activities performed by RPD personnel contributing to public safety. However, it is clear from the number of complaints that improperly parked vehicles are a common nuisance plaguing the public and consume considerable department resources. The availability of improved management reports would permit more personnel and budget resources to be devoted to higher priority issues. The RPD's database allows the program to function but is seriously deficient as a record of activities and as a management tool. Even if careful efforts could overcome the problem of unreliable data, the logging system lacks the important capability to generate management reports. While the data can be analyzed, it is an arduous and difficult process which would be a poor use of managers' time and efforts. These are not trivial deficiencies. Accurate information is the fundamental prerequisite for sound management decision-making involving budgeting, personnel and performance evaluation. Without this capacity it is not possible to determine the cost of the activities or the performance of the program; nor can managers make informed efforts at reform. Only a thorough review reveals potential issues which call for explicit solutions. As noted in the chart, more than 40% of the complaints concluded by a visit revealing the offending vehicle had already been moved. This constitutes a significant expenditure of resources. Data analysis also reveals that many street names showed up in numerous complaints. Even in the short periods Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report reviewed by the Grand Jury, some locations appeared in numerous complaints, suggesting that certain locations may justify posting parking regulations rather than conducting repeated visits. In spite of their technical shortcomings, the Grand Jury's investigation determined the City of Roseville's Municipal Code pertaining to abandoned vehicles is being administered by the Roseville Police Department in a competent and professional manner.

The Grand Jury was generally satisfied with the operation of the Auburn Police Department facility, other than the possibility of officer safety related to the fire extinguisher.

As a result of the shifting of responsibilities from the State to counties, the jail population now consists of inmates incarcerated for more serious offenses and for longer terms. Progress is being made to provide educational, vocational, mental and physical health services. These services are necessary to meet the needs of this evolving inmate population and potentially reduce recidivism rates. All Placer County jails and holding cells are secure and appear to be well-managed, with the exception of the Burton Creek facility. The building does not meet ADA requirements and does not function as a booking and holding facility.

The Grand Jury commends Placer County for its efforts in addressing juvenile delinquency and helping to reduce the rate of recidivism. As a result of their efforts, the Placer County Juvenile Detention Facility now has significantly fewer detainees than the facility was designed to accommodate. Continuing educational opportunities and job-seeking skills are provided to the detainees. The Grand Jury also commends the staff and management of the JDF for their positive attitudes and interactions with detainees.

With the exception of the automatic locking mechanism to the holding cells, the RCPS and holding cells appeared to be well-managed and maintained. Overall, the Grand Jury commends the RCPS for its operation and upkeep of this facility. The Grand Jury also commends the RCPS for working with other community partners and making their facility available for training and regional emergency services.

Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report Request For Responses:

74 % Number of "D"s Number of 201 ber of NA Percent of System in Good Repair Number of """ System in Sood Repair ("Orda Aves" "" Wary") Total Percent per Category (everage of above) (AVES") Rank Circle one) (GOOD alloys-1004 FARE 1789-89 994 FOOR 109-779-89 994 OVERALL RATING: School P. Matt Shawver PART III: CATOTALNUMBER OFAREASEVALUATED COMMENTS Chana High PERCENTAGE (REV 05/09) 3:00 P.M. 99%-1009 Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 2 - FIT REPORT - ONORATO EDUCATIONAL CENTER 0 0 100 0 anal Center (SMD School) 0 |= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onorato Educati 0 0 | = 0

COMMENTS OWNENTS OMMENTS OMMENTS > > CATEGORY Classroom 25 Classroom 26 AREA Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 1 - FIT REPORT - CHANA HIGH SCHOOL Page 6 of 6 STATE ALLOCATION BOARD OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION 100.00% EXEMPLAR PATING G009 FAIR MBDOW BDODATER/FEN 0 0 0 0 100.00% H. EXTERNAL G009 THE INSPECTOR(S) (F.APPLICABLE) NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE 100.00% EXEMPLARY 0 0 0 CV 100.00% ROOFS 0 0 0 N 100.00% ses of being mitigates N 0000 9 **For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below. STRUCTURAL 100.00% "Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a "poor" ranking for that category and a zero for Total Percent per Category". G. STF (9-12) NAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMP. 0 0 0 N 100.00% encies are isolated, andlor resulting from minor wear and tear, andlor in the pro HANDE LEYELS) HAZARDOMSMATERBALS areas of the school site 0 0 0 7 SCHOOL RATING" 100.00% F. SAFE IY G005 100.00% SAFETY PlacerPlacer 0 0 0 2 veral FOUNTAINS OUNTABLE 0 0 2 0 meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or impact a very small area of the school 100.00% Sary NA se are neces RESTROOMS E. PLESTR 0 0 2 0 Chana High School Coordinator, MOT, Facilities & Construction weather concinous The of INSPECTION DESCRIPTION ATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places) D. ELECTRICAL 100.00% 100.00% RECTRICAL out the site. Major G009 0 0 0 3 additio despread Repairs and/or PESTVERMIN 100.00% dies noted. These defici 0 0 0 N noted throu C. CLEANLINESS 100.00% G000 DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE Classrooms are in good condition 100.00% CLEARLNESS need ever seen 0 0 0 0 45P ECTOR'S TITLE 100.00% 100.00% with a number of non-critical deficie SURFACES G009 0 0 0 Rainy 7 critical B. mr Some deficiencies noted are 100.00% 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0000 MECHINO 0 0 0 0 AND RATING EXPLANATION: STATE OF CALIFORNIA FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL(FIT) SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION maintained in good repair 100.00% Placer County Office of Education OAS LEAKS 0 0 3 0 is not CATEGORY TOTALS F 01 74 % Number of "D"s Number of 201 ber of NA Percent of System in Good Repair Number of """ System in Sood Repair ("Orda Aves" "" Wary")

Total Percent per Category (everage of above) (AVES")

Rank Circle one) (GOOD alloys-1004 FARE 1789-89 994 FOOR 109-779-89 994 OVERALL RATING: School P. Matt Shawver PART III: CATOTALNUMBER OFAREASEVALUATED

Chana High PERCENTAGE (REV 05/09) 3:00 P.M. 99%-1009 Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 2 - FIT REPORT - ONORATO EDUCATIONAL CENTER 0 0 100 0 anal Center (SMD School) 0 |= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onorato Educati 0 0 | = 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Name of School: Prot Berkeler 0 c 0 0 c 0 Onorato Educational Center 2 Any Poce ä Non-Existent January 31, 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |- Date of Inspection: 0 0 0 - ۰ 0 0 c 0 SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION 0 0 0 0 0 0 ē | 0 0 0 0 0 0 arking Area Building 1 Grounds EVALUATION DETAIL

Administration 101 Building 1 Exterior Principal 102Classroom 104Classroom 106 Classroom 106 Restroom 110Restroom 110 Mech 112Mech 113Mech 114 Hall 107MTU 108 Asphalt Pa Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 2 - FIT REPORT - ONORATO EDUCATIONAL CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Onorato Educational Center ä . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

onent: 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 3 - FIT REPORT - OLIVE RANCH SCHOOL Page 1 of 6 STATE ALLOCATION BOARD OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION Good Repair Standard are true, and there is no indication of a deficiency in the Deficiency: Mark "D" if one or more statement(s) in the Good Repair Standard for the specific category is not true, or if there is other clear evidence of the school on a category by category basis. The design of the inspection template allows for the the user should review each of the 15 categories identified in the Good Repair Standard and Some of the conditions cited in the Good Repair Standard represent items that are critical to Good Repair Standard is not exhaustive. Any other deficiency not included in the criteria but Part II, Evaluation Detail is a site inspection template to be used to evaluate the areas of a specified in EC Section 17002(d)(1), that should be considered in the inspection of a school make a determination of whether a particular area is in good repair. Once the determination Extreme Deficiency: Indicate "X" if the area has a deficiency that is considered an "Extreme Deficiency" in the Good Repair Standard or there is a Repair Standard. If the underlined statement is not true, then there is an extreme deficiency = the health and safety of pupils and staff. Any deficiencies in these items require immediate determination of the scope of conditions across campus. In evaluating each area or space, attention and, if left unmittigated, could cause severe and immediate injury, illness or death Each of the 15 sections in the Good Repair Standard provides a description of a minimum applicable category. It is important to note that the list of extreme deficiencies noted in the condition that qualifies as an extreme deficiency but is not noted in the Good These critical conditions are identified with underlined text followed by an (X) on the Good examples of clean, safe and functional conditions. The list of examples is not exhaustive. facility to ensure it is maintained in a manner that assures it is clean, safe and functional. standard of good repair for various school facility categories. Each section also provides No Deficiency - Good Repair: Insert a check mark if all statements in the Not Applicable: If the Good Repair Standard category (building system or component) does not exist in the area evaluated, mark "NA". Part I, Good Repair Standard outlines the school facility systems and components, as deficiency, the evaluator can note such deficiency in the applicable category as "other." building system evaluated failed to meet the standard of good repair at that school site. meeting the definition above can be noted by the evaluator and generate a poor rating. an evaluator notes a condition that is not mentioned in the examples but constitutes a of the occupants. They constitute extreme deficiencies and indicate that the particular (to be marked as an "X" on the Evaluation Detail) resulting in a "poor" rating for the is made, it should be recorded on the Evaluation Detail, as follows: The FIT is comprised of three parts as follows: specific category Repair Standard need for repair USER INSTRUCTIONS Olive Ranch School ž >

× stem has been established to ensure that each of its facilities is maintained in facility that poses an emergency or urgent threat to the health or safety of pupils or staff as determined by EC Section 1240. Further, EC Section 1240(c)(2)(I), states the require capital enhancements beyond the standards to which the facility was designed and The tool is designed to identify areas of a school site that are in need of repair based upon is defined to mean that the facility is maintained in a manner that ensures that in order to participate in the School Facility Program and the Deferred Program. This tool is intended to assist school districts and county offices of and adequacy of school facilities, including good repair as required by EC 14, 17032.5, 17070.75, and 17089. This tool is also intended to assist county Code (EC) Section 17002(d)(1) and to rate the facility pursuant to EC Section 17002(d)(2) a visual inspection of the site. In addition, the EC specifies the tool should not be used to allows individual entities to adopt a local evaluation instrument to be used in as implemented in the FIT. Any evaluation instrument adopted by the local school conditions including the safety, cleanliness, and adequacy of school facilities and needed maintenance to ensure good repair. In addition, beginning with the 2005/2006 agency for purpose of determining whether a school facility is maintained in county offices of education are required to make specified assessments of priority objective of the visits made shall be to determine the status of the condition of a County superintendents are required to annually visit the schools in the county of his or to determine if a school facility is in "good repair" as defined by Education good repair may include any number of additional items but must minimally include the strict policy, or as defined by EC Section 17592.72(c) and the accuracy of it is clean, safe, and functional. As part of the school accountability report card, school T provided the local instrument meets the criteria specified in EC Section nspection Tool (FIT) has been developed by the Office of Public School fiscal year, school districts and county offices of education must certify that a facility data reported on the school accountability report card with the respect to the safety ication in performing these functions. criteria and rating scheme contained in the FIT. SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION SPECTION TOOL that determination GENERAL INFORMATION FORNIA STATE OF CAL FACILITY IN Construction Maintenance her office as defined in dis Sections 170 offices of edi The EC also 17002(d) and educational a The Facility inspection sy constructed Good repair districts and good repair education in lieu of the FI cleanliness, (REV 05/09) Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 3 - FIT REPORT - OLIVE RANCH SCHOOL STATE ALLOCATION BOARD DEFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION category (A through H) is determined by the total of all percentages of systems in good repair divided by the number of sections in that category. For example, to determine the total received a rating of extreme deficiency, the ratio (i.e., the percentage of good repair) for that percent for the Structural category, add the percentages for the Structural Damage and Rool deficiencies and/or does not match the rating's Description in Part III. In such instances, the Once the inspector completes the site inspection, he or she must total the number of areas evaluated. The inspector must also count all of the spaces deemed in good repair, deficient, extremely deficient, or not applicab table provided in Part III to the average percentage calculated and taking into consideration facility conditions, it is possible that an evaluator may identify critical facility conditions that Part III includes the Category Totals and Ranking, the Overall Rating, and a section for rating of the eight categories (i.e., the total of all percentages divided by eight). Finally, the rater should determine the overall School Rating by applying the Percentage Range in the inspection as well as weather conditions and any other pertinent inspection information in result in an Overall School Rating that does not reflect the urgency and severity of those *Although the FIT is designed to evaluate each school site within a reasonable range of the specific areas provided and utilize the Comments and Rating Explanation Section if must determine the condition of each section by taking the ratio of the number of areas describe the reasons for the reduction in the space provided for Comments and Rating Next, the overall school site score is determined by computing the average percentage When completing Part III of the FIT, the instructor should note the date and time of the evaluator may reduce the resulting school score by one or more grade categories and applicable spaces from the total number of areas evaluated). If any of the 15 sections section and the category the section is in should default to zero. The total percent per deemed in good repair to the number of areas being evaluated (after subtracting non- the Rating Description provided in the same table. Comments and Rating Explanation sections and divide the result by two Olive Ranch School Explanation. pepeau classrooms as in good repair, assuming there are no other visible deficiencies related to Cleanliness, rather than Interior Surfaces. At the same time, the user should note such as parts of individual areas in order to accurately account for a scope of any

Overall Cleanliness is intended to be used to evaluate the cleanliness of each space.

areas. However, because a deficiency in either of these systems could become evident restrooms contained within other spaces, such as a kindergarten classroom or a library mmediately outside the area being evaluated, it should be included in the evaluation of

Playgrounds/School Grounds, should be evaluated as separate areas by dividing a

"NA" and should instead include an evaluation of these systems in each building space s or restrooms or other areas, or as stand alone fixtures on playgrounds and and present a health and safety threat anywhere on campus, the user should not mark iciency. For example, a 10 classroom building contains damaged gutters on evaluated as part of that outside space. If there is no drinking fountain in the repair criteria would not apply to the evaluation, as they do not exist outside of physical is designed to evaluate stand-alone restrooms as separate areas. However, can be evaluated as part of that area under Restrooms. If the area evaluated does not Sewer are major building systems that may span the entire school campus but may not be evident as applicable building systems in each classroom or common deficiency only in Overall Cleanliness in order to avoid accounting for such deficiency fountains can exist within individual classrooms or areas, right outside of

Roofs can be easily evaluated for stand alone areas, such as portable classrooms.

sports fields. If a drinking fountain or a set of fountains is located inside a building or campus into sections with defined borders. In this case, several sections of the good that area under Drinking Fountains. If a fountain is located on the school grounds, it For permanent buildings containing several areas to be evaluated, roofs should be considered as parts of individual areas in order to accurately account for a scope of one side of the building, spanning across five classrooms. Therefore, an evaluator should mark five classrooms as deficient in the roof category and the other five For example, a user should note a deficiency due to dirty surfaces in Overall building areas, such as Structural Damage and Fire Safety, for example. aggested methods for evaluating various systems and areas Drinking Fountains should be marked "NA. contain a restroom, Restrooms should be marked "NA. STATE OF CALIFORNIA FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION in two sections. area evaluated, · Gas and roofing def

Below are st classroom should be

twice, i.e. (REV 05/09) roofing. Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 3 - FIT REPORT - OLIVE RANCH SCHOOL Page 3 of 6 STATE ALLOCATION BOARDOFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION Overall Cleanliness School grounds, buildings, common areas, and individual rooms appear to have been Lighting appears to be adequate and working properly, including exterior lights.Examples include but are not limited to the following: Electrical systems, components, and equipment appear to be working properly Electrical (Interior and Exterior) 1. There is no evidence that any portion of the school has a power failure. (x)

There are no exposed electrical wires. Electrical equipment is properly

c. Restrooms, drinking fountains, and food preparation or serving areas Outlets, access panels, switch plates, junction boxes and fixtures are cleaned regularly. Examples include but are not limited to the following:

a. Area(s) evaluated is free of accumulated refuse, dirt, and grime. b. Area(s) evaluated is free of unabated graffiti.

appear to have been cleaned each day that school is in session. a. There is no evidence of a major pest or vermin infestation. (X) b. There are no holes in the walle.

d. Odor caused by a pest or vermin infestation is not evident.

a. Lighting appears to be adequate. b. Lighting is not flickering c. There is no unusual hum or noise from the light fixtures. c. There is no unusual hum or noise from the light fixtures. PestVermin Infestation Pest or vermin infestation are not evident. Examples include but are not limited to the following: Examples include but are not limited to the following There are no holes in the walls, floors, or ceilings Rodent droppings or insect skins are not evident. properly covered and secured from pupil access. covered and secured from pupil access. (X) There are no live rodents observed. Olive Ranch School Other Other Other 0 ò. p N o + o Interior Surfaces (Floors, Cellings, Walls, and Window Casings) Interior surfaces appear to be clean, safe, and functional. Examples include but are not Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems (HVAC) as applicable are functional (X): If underlined statement is not true, then this is an extreme deficiency (marked as an

The ventilation units are unobstructed and vents and grills are without evidence

and facilities (i.e. no strong odor is present, air is not stuffy)\ne. Interior temperatures appear to be maintained within normally accepted ranges. "X") on the Evaluation Detail resulting in a "poor" rating for the applicable category. stoppage is not evident. Examples include but are not limited to the

d. There appears to be an adequate air supply to all classrooms, work spaces,

There are no obvious signs of flooding caused by sewer line back-up in the

f. The ventilation units are not generating any excessive noise or vibrations. no evidence of water damage (e.g. no condensation, dampness, is free of hazards from torn carpeting, missing floor tiles, holes. Gas pipes are not broken and appear to be in good working order. (X) and unobstructed. Examples include but are not limited to the following

a. The HVAC system is operable. (X) b. The facilities are ventilated (via mechanical or natural ventilation)

Gas systems and pipes appear safe, functional, and free of leaks.Examples include but are not limited to the following:

Walls are free of hazards from tears and holes. Enoting is free of hazards from tom carpeting, missing floor the company of the of hazards from missing ceiling lists and holes. Ceilin no odor that would indicate a gas leak. (X) warping, peeling, mineral deposits, etc.)

b. The sanitary system controls odors as designed

facilities or on the school grounds. (X) STATE OF CALIFORNIA FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION PART I: GOOD REPAIR STANDARD of excessive dirt or dust. limited to the following: Mechanical Systems Gas Leaks a. There is to Gas piper c. Other Sewer line staining, following: g. Other c. Other e. Other (REV 05/09) Sewer Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 3 - FIT REPORT - OLIVE RANCH SCHOOL Page 4 of 6 STATE ALLOCATION BOARDOFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION hazardous or uninhabitable conditions. Examples include but are not limited to the d. Windows are functional and open, close, and lock as designed, unless there is There does not appear to be structural damage that has created or could create Doors are functional and open, close, and lock as designed, unless there is a Gates and fences are intact and free of holes and other conditions that could Ceilings & floors are not sloping or sagging beyond their intended design, (X) building members appear to be intact, secure and functional as designed. (X)

Posts, beams, supports for portable classrooms, ramps, and other structural

The playground equipment and school grounds in the vicinity of the area being There is no visible evidence of severe cracks, dry rot, mold, or damage that Exterior doors and gates are functioning and do not pose a security risk. (X) Seating, tables, and equipment are functional and free of significant cracks

d. There are no signs of drainage problems, such as flooded areas, eroded

Roofs, gutters, roof drains, and down spouts are free of visible damage. Open "S" hooks, protruding bolt ends, and sharp points/edges are not Significant cracks, trip hazards, holes and deterioration are not found a. There is no exposed broken glass accessible to pupils and staff. (X) b. Exterior doors and cates are function in a contraction of the contraction of the contraction of the contraction of the contraction of the contracti Roofs (observed from the ground, inside/outside the building) Conditions that pose a safety and/or security risk are not evident. Examples include but are not limited to the following: soil, water damage to asphalt, or clogged storm drain inlets. Roofs, gutters, roof drains, and down spouts are intact. Windows/Doors/Gates/Fences (Interior and exterior) a valid reason they should not function as designed Examples include but are not limited to the following: Examples include but are not limited to the following: valid reason they should not function as designed present a safety hazard to pupils, staff, or others. Other evaluated appear to be clean, safe, and functional. Roof systems appear to be functioning properly. undermines the structural components. (X) Gates and fences appear to be functional.

Windows are intact and free of cracks.

found in the playground equipment. Severe cracks are not evident (X) Playground/School Grounds Structural Damage Doors are intact. Olive Ranch School following: Other Other e. Other o o 0 0 o o o e o o ø 9 4 + not appear to be evidence of hazardous materials that may pose a threat to Restrooms in the vicinity of the area being evaluated appear to be accessible during school hours, clean, functional and in compliance with SB 892 (EC Section 35292.5) (including floors, ceilings, walls, window casings, HVAC grills) appear

The fire sprinklers appear to be in working order (e.g., there are no missing or

c. There does not appear to be damaged tiles or other circumstances that may The fire equipment and emergency systems appear to be functioning properly us chemicals, chemical waste, and flammable materials are stored

D. Emergency alarms appear to be functional. (X) C. Emergency existings introllor as designed, exits are unobstructed. (X) C. Free extinguishers are current and placed in all required Drinking fountains appear to be accessible and functioning as intended

Restrooms are maintained and cleaned regularly. Restrooms are fully operational. Restrooms are stocked with toller paper, soap, and paper towels. A Restrooms are open during school hours. Other pupils or staff. Examples include but are not limited to the following no moss, mold, or excessive staining on the fixtures. e. The water is clear and without unusual taste or odor include but are not limited to the following: include but are not limited to the following: to be free of mildew, mold odor and visible mold. (e.g. locked and labeled properly). (X) Hazardous Materials (Interior and Exterior) not peeling, chipping, or cracking, Sinks/Fountains (Inside and Outside) FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION fountains are accessible damaged sprinkler heads). (X)

Drinking fountains are accessil Water pressure is adequate. A leak is not evident. A leak is no moss, mold, or exc asbestos exposure. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Restrooms d. Surfaces Drinking Fire Safet There doe: a. Hazardo properly indicate Examples Examples Paint is Other (REV 05/09) f. Other f. Other ò Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 3 - FIT REPORT - OLIVE RANCH SCHOOL STATE ALLOCATION BOARD OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION Page 5 of 6 15WINDOWSDOORS/GATES/FENC ¥ > > > > > > > > > > > 14PLAYGROUNDYSCHOOLGROUNDS

> > > > > > > > > > > ROOFS ¥ 43 > > > > > > > > > > > 12STRUCTURALDAMAGE Marks: \sqrt{} = Good Repair; D = Deficiency; X = Extreme Deficiency; NA = Not Applicable Use additional Area Lines as necessary. ¥ > > > > > > > > > > > HAZARDOUSMATERIALS Ξ > > > > > > > > > > > > FIRE SAFETY 우 > > > > > > > > > > > > SINKS/FOUNTAINS ž Y. YY ¥ ¥ YZ Z > 6 > > > > RESTROOM NAA Ä Ž ¥ NN ¥ ¥ ¥ YZ Ž œ > > Olive Ranch School School Name: Olive Ranch ELECTRICAL ¥Z > Engineered Wood Fiber Level Too Low. Swingset Missing Swing. > > > > > > > > > > PESTVERAIN > > > > > > > > 0 > > > > CLEANUNESS > > > > > > > > > > 2 > > SURFACES 11/18/1 4 > > > > > > > > > > > > Date of Inspection: SEWER > > 3 > > > > > > > > > > MECHANAC ¥ STATE OF CALIFORNIA FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION (REV 95/09) > > > > > > > > > > > OMMENTS GAS LEAKS

DAMENTS OMMENTS OMMENTS OWNENTS OMMENTS OMMENTS MARKENTS MMENTS OVAMENTS OWNENTS ¥ ž YZ ¥ YZ ¥ Y ¥ ¥ Z Z Z PART II: EVALUATION DETAIL CATEGORY ObservationRoom 2 ObservationRoom 1 pur Kitchen 205A 205B Playgrou Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 3 - FIT REPORT - OLIVE RANCH SCHOOL STATE ALLOCATION BOARD OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION Page 6 of 6 Olive Ranch Building C1 is in excellent condition and meets safety criteria with exception of the playground, which needs engineered wood fiber and swing replacement. EXEMPLAR 100.00% PATING G009 FAIR MBDOW BDODATER/FENC Ξ 0 0 H. EXTERNAL 95.84% G009 INSPECTOR(S) (F APPLICABLE) UMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE 91.67% EXEMPLARY Ξ 0 0 100.00% ROOFS = 0 0 - 12NO THE 9 100.00% 0000 **For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below. STRUCTURAL.DAMAGE 100.00% Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a "poor" ranking for that category and a zero for "Total Percent per Category." G. STF WAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMP. = 0 0 100.00% Placerschool TYPE (BRADE LEVELS) and/or in the pro HAZARDOUSMATERALS ol sta 12 0 0 0 SCHOOL RATING" 100.00% F. SAFE IY G005 steas of the sc 100.00% SAFETY year and tear 12 0 0 0 NA 100.00% FOUNTAINS OUNTABLE 0 9 0 1 esulting from mino impact a very small area of the school 100.00% 99.48% G005 100.00% RESTROOMS E. PLESTF 10 0 0 0 Olive Ranch School Coordinator, MOT, Facilities & Construction ancies are isolated. DESCRIPTION ATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places) D. ELECTRICAL 100.00% 100.00% out the site. Major RECTRICAL G009 Ξ 0 0 artifitio meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or 100.00% PESTVERMON pread Repairs and/ 12 dies noted. These defic 0 0 0 C. CLEANLINESS 100.00% G000 DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE 100.00% CLEARLNESS 12 ses have been 0 0 0 ASPECTOR'S TITLE 100.00% 100.00% with a number of non-critical deficie #CTERIORSURFACES G009 Sunny 12 0 0 0 B. mr Some deficiencies noted are 100.00% 12 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0000 Ξ 0 0 MECHAN AND RATING EXPLANATION: STATE OF CALIFORNIA FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL(FIT) SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION maintained in good repair OAS LEAKS Placer County Office of Education 12 0 0 0 November 18, 2016 2:30 P.M.'s is not CATEGORY TOTALS F 01 74 % Number of N/Asn Good Repail Number of "D"s Number of 2019 Percent of System in Good Repair Number of """ System in Sood Repair ("Orda Aves" "" Wary")

Rank Circle one) (GOOD alloys-1004 FARE 1789-89 994 FOOR 109-779-89 994 OVERALL RATING: School Matt Shawver PART III: CATOTALNUMBER OFAREASEVALUATED

Olive Ranch PERCENTAGE (REV 05/09) 99%-1009 Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report ATTACHMENT 4 - OLIVE RANCH SCHOOL 9 REMOVE (E) --- (E) MECH27 SF 0 MIDDLE SCHOOL203880 SF 1 B-- E 0 (E) HALLWAY20 SF (B) TOILETS2 S7 (N) KITCHEN EQUIPM W N) CASEWORK . 0 OFFICE206063 SF OFFICE205A86 SF (E) TECH20.5F GROUP ROOM204441 SF 8 DAY ROOM2002845 SF 2068260 SF C106 . . E) KITCHEN ÷ TORLETS2 55" (E) MECH27 SF (E) MECH (8) STO 1

Placer County Grand Jury 2016-2017 Final Report Roseville Police Code Enforcement Improperly Parked or Abandoned Vehicles Summary The Placer County Grand Jury undertook an investigation into the Roseville Police Department's (RPD) response to citizen complaints regarding improperly parked or abandoned vehicles on Roseville city streets. The RPD Abandoned Vehicle Program does not typically involve sworn peace officers. This function is carried out primarily by Community Service Officers (CSO) and police cadets. As the result of the interviews and examination of documentation, the Grand Jury determined the RPD was able to record, process and resolve abandoned vehicle complaints in a timely manner. Over 90% of calls were settled without a vehicle being cited or towed. The Grand Jury concluded that the Roseville Municipal Code pertaining to abandoned vehicles is being administered by the RPD in a competent and professional manner.