San Diego County Grand Jury • 2015-2016 • Agency Response
Response to: Citizen Oversight Boards of Police Behavior

Perented Aug K 4 2016 August 16, 2016 County Grand Jury The Honorable Jeffrey B. Barton Presiding Judge, San Diego*

Published: August 16, 2016 3 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 2 findings

F05
Cities without a citizens' oversight board do not have public review of complaints of police behavior and risk losing the trust of their citizens. Response: Disagree in part. The City of El Cajon agrees that cities without a citizens' oversight board do not have public review of complaints of police behavior; the City disagrees, however, that the lack of such an oversight board creates a risk that the City will lose the trust of its citizens. „The State of California legislature has adopted guidelines and rules for review of citizen complaints regarding police. The City of El Cajon fully supports State law and our procedures regarding citizen complaints are fully consistent with this legislation, as well as the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights. As a result, the citizen complaint process of the El Cajon Police Department is clear, fair and impartial. The final review and approval authority of all such investigations ultimately rests with the City Manager who, in addition, has the option of requesting additional review by the City Attorney's Office and the Human Resources Department if felt warranted. The City Manager, City Attorney and Department of Human Resources are entirely independent of the Police Department.
F06
A review board shaped with citizen input will promote confidence in actions taken by the board. Response: Disagree wholly. Explanation:

Recommendations 2

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.