Score: +10 (16/20/6)
Sacramento County Grand Jury • 2022-2023

Rancho Murieta Community Services District Has Lost Public Trust

Published: March 19, 2023 14 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 12 findings

F1
The District Board has lost the trust of the community to make prudent financial decisions.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The District board should upgrade the District’s billing and accounting system with the new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) accounting system
F2
The current accounting system is inadequate to meet the legal requirements related to financial reporting to the public which has resulted in two legally required financial audits being overdue.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The District Board should insure that the audit for 2020-21 is completed no later than April 1, 2023, and the FY 2021-22 audit
F3
The late audits, combined with the unreliable existing accounting system, have created an environment that exposes the District to a high risk of fraud.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The District Board should task its ERP consultant to implement a program to fully train District accounting staff on this new accounting system and prepare new accounting manuals acceptable to the General Manager or designee
F4
The District Board cannot expect to recover public trust sufficient to propose any tax/fee increases until it replaces its antiquated billing and accounting system to produce reliable billings and financial records.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The District Board should retain a controller to ensure proper accounting procedures are followed and the integrity of the accounting data is maintained
F5
The District has at times taken actions against staff that has interfered with the operation of the District.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The District needs to ensure invoices are tracked within the accounting system and that the accounts payable listing be generated on a monthly basis
F6
High employee turnover indicates poor employee retention that has interfered with the operation of the District.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The District should create an ongoing training program for the Board and staff regarding the Brown Act compliance, accounting procedures, and work place practices and behaviors including prevention of harassment in the work environment. This should be fully implemented in 2024.
F7
The lack of an effective succession strategy has impaired the ability of the District to maintain adequate competent staff which has resulted in the loss of critical accounting system knowledge among the District staff.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The District should adopt a policy to ensure that proposed personnel adverse actions are reviewed by someone not in the chain of command to ensure that proper procedures are followed. In the case of proposed adverse actions by executive staff this could be accomplished through the use of an outside expert in personnel matters or legal counsel.
F8
The lack of an updated Capital Reserve Policy has contributed to poor management and inadequate Capital Reserve.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The District Board should require administration to report quarterly on staff development and staff identified concerns beginning October 1, 2023.
F9
The use of County Property Tax funds to subsidize its growing security costs without raising the security fees has jeopardized the financial stability of the District.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
The District should reduce its security services funding to a level that is supported by fees paid by residents specific to fund security services.
F10
The Capital Reserves are underfunded by over $10 million, jeopardizing the financial stability of the District.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
Effectively immediately, County tax funds currently allocated to security services, should be redirected to the Capital Reserves.
F11
The District has inappropriately subsidized the cost of reclaimed water to RMCC.
Related Recommendations (1)
R11
The District Board should revise its current capitol reserve fund policy to identify specific funding goals for each capitol asset category with supporting fees sufficient to meet the long-term infrastructure needs of the District.
F12
A perceived conflict of interest exists in the community due to a close relationship between the District, the RMA and the RMCC and their respective Board members.
Related Recommendations (1)
R12
The District Board should revise its agreement with the RMCC and begin charging for the use of reclaimed water on the RMCC golf courses at rates typical in the Sacramento area

Additional Recommendations 1

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

Observations 1

Agency Responses 2

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Sacramento County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office