Riverside County Grand Jury
• 1998-1999
• Agency Response
Beaumont- Cherry Valley Water District Officers P.o. Box 2037 Directors Jo Ellen Seick Gary McKenzie*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 7 findings
F1
per diem and reimbursement. In addition, the Board has made a policy determination to implement the procedure set forth in Section 5(c) of Resolution 98-3, as amended by Resolution 99-1, as to accepted activities which will not require further approval. This policy determination was made following discussions between the Board and the District Staff as to workable definitions for activities that would be considered acceptable. The Board agrees with this finding in that it provides an accurate
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Board will consider this recommendation within the next six (6) months.
F2
description of the policy cited. - ب الأراب Members of the Grand Jury Page Two
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Board will consider this recommendation within the next six (6) months. The Board has determined that this recommendation will not be
F3
The Board agrees with this finding in that it is correct that such committees do not have written guidelines or procedures. However, the District is not unique in its procedure whereby the committees are established and its members are then authorized to proceed with their duties. It should be noted that such committees, by their very nature, are not authorized to take binding action on behalf of the District. Any action taken by the committees is in the form of recommendations that are reported back to the full Board for possible action.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
implemented at this time. Please see the response to this issue as set forth in paragraph 3 under
F4
The Board agrees with this finding to the extent that meetings of the board of directors of a public agency should follow established parliamentary procedures and the discussion should not deviate from the agenda item under consideration.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
following parliamentary procedure. However, it should be noted that strict adherence to such procedures at all times may not be possible taking into account the nature of the District as a public agency that conducts meetings that are open to the public.
F5
The Board agrees with this finding to the extent that the Board is currently taking action to address this need.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Board has already implemented this recommendation. Please see the response to this issue as set forth in paragraph 5 under Findings.
F6
The Board agrees with this finding to the extent that the Board is currently taking action to address this need.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The Board has already implemented this recommendation. Please see the response to this issue as set forth in paragraph 6 under Findings. ا مي ^ . ~ Members of the Grand Jury Page Three The Board has already implemented this recommendation. Please see the
F7
The Board agrees with this finding to the extent that the Board and District Staff are looking into this matter.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
response to this issue as set forth in paragraph 7 under Findings. The Board appreciates the opportunity to respond to the Grand Jury Report. Sincerely, Misemie Your Gary McKenzie President, Board of Directors .
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.