Kings County Grand Jury
• 2023-2024
Kings County Assessor/Clerk/Recorders Office Issues With The Recording of Documents
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
The Kings County Assessor/Clerk/Recorders Office online presence lacks examples of documents used by County and City departments, and the requirements to record those legal documents are not available.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Include on the Kings County Assessor/Clerk/Recorders Office website, templates and examples of documents frequently used by City and County departments and the requirements that need to be met to record those legal documents.
F2
County departments in Kings County and cities in Kings County do not have a physical in- house manual of examples and requirements showing how to record legal documents specific to their particular department.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Each department should produce its own manual of commonly used documents, templates, examples of those documents, what information is required, and how it should be presented to be acceptable for recording in the Kings County Assessor/Clerk/Recorders Office.
F3
Communication between the Kings County Assessor/Clerk/Recorders Office, County departments, and the departments of the four incorporated cities in Kings County could be improved as to the recording of documents because the requirements seemingly change frequently.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
An emphasis should be placed on the importance of frequent communication by both County of Kings departments, City departments, and the Assessor/Clerk/Recorders Office.
F4
Documents presented for recording are treated inconsistently.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Kings County Assessor/Clerk/Recorders Office should conduct more frequent training of personnel to provide consistent, uniform information and service to County and City departments in Kings County. REQUIRED RESPONSE Pursuant to Penal Code Section § 914.1 provided in part: “No later than 60 days after the Grand Jury Submits a final report on the operations of any public agency subject to its reviewing authority, the governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body and every elected county officer or agency head for which the Grand Jury had responsibility…” pursuant to Section § 914.1 shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court…” Kings County Assessor/Clerk/Recorder 1400 W. Lacey Blvd. Hanford, CA 93230 Pursuant to Penal Code Section § 933 (c), provided in part: “No later than 90 days after the Grand Jury Submits a final report on the operations of any public agency subject to its reviewing authority, the governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body and every elected county officer or agency head for which the Grand Jury had responsibility pursuant to Section § 914.1 shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court…” Kings County Board of Supervisors 1400West Lacey Boulevard Hanford, CA 93230 Respond with Original to: Judge Jennifer Giuliani, Presiding Judge Kings County Superior Court 1640 Kings Court Drive Hanford, CA 93230 Respond with Copy to: Kings County Civil Grand Jury P O Box #1562 Hanford, CA 93230 8
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Kings County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office