📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 2 findings
F1
Page 8
Custodial Contracts and their compliance. Four vendor contract facilities were visited. The Grand Jury found these facilities satisfactorily complied with their contracts. The Facilities Management administration was also visited. Vendor files were provided to the Grand Jury for review. All files were checked against an internal checklist and everything was in order. A visitation to the Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse did establish one finding of concern. Supplies and equipment at this location are stored and maintained in a stairwell area near the main lobby. The stairway is in constant use by courthouse staff during working hours. This storage and work area is not conducive to a safe or secure work environment. The door to the stairwell opens onto the main lobby, and cleaning solutions are stored under employee traveled stairs. Facilities Management staff did advise the Grand Jury that their operational storage area has been moved to different locations over the years under the direction of the Court.
Related Recommendations (2)
R09-76
Page 9
Take immediate steps to relocate the Facilities Management custodial supply storage area to an adequate, safe, and secure area for all county employees, contracted employees, and members of the public. (Finding 1)
R09-77
Page 9
Modify vendor contracts to allow communication between employees and supervisors to include the use of either cell phones or pagers. (Finding 1)
F2
Page 9
West Valley Detention Center power failure of August 28, 2008. The Grand Jury interim final report was previously issued. (See Ad Hoc section of this Final Report)
No recommendations for this finding