Riverside County Grand Jury
• 2013-2014
Riverside County Mental Health Department Public Guardian
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 6 findings
F1
After a review of the current policies and procedures the Grand Jury finds that the Public Guardian does not have a policy regarding the maximum number of clients served per Public Guardian Deputy. Documentation provided by the Public Guardian department revealed that current caseloads varied from fifty-nine (59) to one hundred ninety six (196) per Public Guardian Deputy. Sworn testimony obtained from interviewees indicates that caseloads to be reduced so that each patients needs can be managed more efficiently. Public Guardian management needs to make this assessment.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Public Guardian management shall develop a policy that will incorporate an acceptable range of caseloads per Public Guardian Deputy that can be handled expeditiously and efficiently. Caseloads shall be monitored by program supervisors.
F2
Upon reviewing the policies and procedures of the Public Guardian, the Grand Jury found that the policies and procedures manual have not been updated since 1988. The policy and procedure manual does not contain an index, which would facilitate locating policy topics. In accordance with Policy #407, a review is to be done annually. The Public Guardian does not follow their internal procedure. The laws and programs have changed, which include probate and penal codes.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Public Guardian Program Manager shall review and update their policy and procedure manual to reflect current practices and prepare an index.
F3
Sworn testimony indicated that caseloads are unmanageable. It was revealed that there were tasks that additional clerical personnel could do that would free up the Public Guardian Deputies. Public Guardian Deputies stated that they must prioritize tasks, according to importance, and that consequently some tasks are left undone or delayed.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The Public Guardian shall hire additional clerical staff to do tasks that would free up Public Guardian Deputy Caseworkers.
F4
Testimony revealed that equipment such as ergonomic furniture, headphones, computers, software, and printers are outdated or inoperative for long periods of time.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Public Guardian shall research software programs, used by like organizations that will help save time and facilitate efficiency of case management. Equipment such as scanners, printers, headphones, and ergonomic furniture shall be evaluated for effectiveness and efficiency, and upgraded as required.
F5
According to Public Guardian management, the economic recession required a freeze on hiring but that has recently been suspended and additional staff are being hired to bring the Public Guardian staffing up to authorized levels. Sworn testimony from Public Guardian Deputies indicated that when caseloads exceed sixty (60) patients the quality of service is compromised. Additional testimony revealed that when Public Guardian Deputies complain about the loss of quality of services due to large caseloads, they are told, by supervisors to “do as much as you can.” 3
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Public Guardian shall continue to pursue supplemental funding to hire and train additional Public Guardian Deputies in order to reduce caseloads and improve overall quality of services.
F6
The Riverside County Public Guardian does not have a policy requiring staff meetings. At the time of this report sworn testimony indicated that there has not been a regular scheduled staff meeting with the Program Manager LPS/Probate staff since April 2013.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The Public Guardian shall write a policy requiring monthly staff meetings to inform staff of the developments within the Public Guardian programs. The program manager shall resolve issues and concerns affecting personnel that are addressed in staff meetings. Report Issued: 12/18/2013 Report Public: 12/20/2013 Response Due: 03/18/2014 4