📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Los Angeles County Grand Jury • 2008-2009

An Investigation of Elder Abuse Prevention Services and Programs

108 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 5 findings

F1 Page 340
1 Neither the County nor Adult Protective Services (APS) currently has a strategic plan in place with specific goals, objectives, targets, fiscal needs and plans and outcome measures to guide the provision of services and programs for the prevention and intervention of elder and dependent adult abuse for the next several years.
F2 Page 354
1 Current outreach conducted by APS is more reactive than proactive and not based on any analysis of demographic data showing where the risk of abuse or need for services may be greatest.
F3 Page 363
1 While APS program management has established a comprehensive ongoing training curriculum for its social work staff, adherence to the training curriculum does not appear to be taking place. The Department does not have any documentation indicating that all of the trainings have been presented or which APS social work staff attended them.
F4 Page 373
1 Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) oversight of the Community and Senior Services’ (CSS) performance in administering the Adult Protective Services (APS) program lacks a comprehensive analysis of client outcome measures.
F5 Page 384
1 A program is in place that provides preventive services to a population defined as at risk of elder abuse at two County medical facilities. The program has not been established at the County’s three other medical facilities.

Recommendations 5