📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Lake County Grand Jury • 2009-2010

Lake County Code Enforcement

2 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings and Recommendations 3 findings

F1 Page 178
There is no record of a phone conversation at Code Enforcement from the complainant.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 178
Code Enforcement change department policy to record calls requesting information, not just formal complaints. Include date, time, where calls were directed, and keep on file for the same length of time as formal complaints. (F1,F2) Agency/Department(s) Required to Respond: • Community Development Department via Board of Supervisors (90 days)
F2 Page 178
Code Enforcement has no formal complaint on file from complainant.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 178
Code Enforcement change department policy to record calls requesting information, not just formal complaints. Include date, time, where calls were directed, and keep on file for the same length of time as formal complaints. (F1,F2) Agency/Department(s) Required to Respond: • Community Development Department via Board of Supervisors (90 days)
F3 Page 178
The complainant did not provide evidence to substantiate further investigation into the allegations of misconduct.
No recommendations for this finding