Contra Costa County Grand Jury
• 2016-2017
• Agency Response
Response to:
Funding Flood Control Infrastructure
Recommendation(s):
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 18 findings
F1
The Bay Area Earthquake Plan of July 6, 2016, establishes operational planning and preparation criteria for each Bay Area county. Response: Partially Disagree. The Bay Area Earthquake Plan does serve as an important planning and preparation document. However, the Plan only includes high level strategies and does not include specific incident response strategies.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Sheriff OES should consider creating a schedule for updating the Bay Area Earthquake Plan operational annexes Response: The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or not reasonable. Current Operational Area annexes should be updated to reflect the local, all hazards County Emergency Operations Plan.
F2
The Sheriff OES is charged with planning and coordinating the County’s response to a disaster. Response: Agree.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Board of Supervisors should consider identifying funds by July 1, 2018, to permit Sheriff OES and EHSD to coordinate and complete the Mass Care and Shelter Plan according to the schedule submitted by the Sheriff OES. Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury
F3
Sheriff OES Catastrophic Mass Care and Shelter Plan and other earthquake operational planning and preparation plans, dated 2010, do not meet the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan requirements. Response: Agree. It is important to note that the County’s 2010 Plan was written to link to the previous Bay Area Earthquake Plan. The County Plan has not been updated since the Bay Area Plan was updated in mid-2016.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Sheriff OES should consider developing a written Mass Care and Shelter protocol by July 1, 2018, that covers selection, inspection, and opening a shelter, and identifying funds to do so. Response: The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or not reasonable. In Contra Costa County, the Employment and Human Services Department is responsible for this function. The American Red Cross plays a critical outside support role as well.
F4
EHSD is responsible for executing the Mass Care and Shelter Plan and coordinating with the American Red Cross to operate emergency shelters.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Sheriff OES should consider including shelter selection, inspection and preparation when it establishes the Emergency Operations Center for a simulated disaster as part of disaster exercises. Response: The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or not reasonable. The Sheriff’s Office does integrate shelter operations into exercises performed in the Emergency Operations Center. However, the responsibility for site selection, inspection and preparation rests with the Employment and Human Services Department for the unincorporated areas and the cities for disasters within city limits.
F5
EHSD 2016 Emergency Management Plan differs from the Sheriff OES 2010 Mass Care and Shelter Plan. Response: Agree.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
EHSD should consider access to view the NSS list
F6
EHSD 2016 Emergency Management Plan does not meet the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan requirements. Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
Sheriff OES should consider providing training to EHSD on how to use the NSS system after EHSD is granted access to view the NSS list. Response: This recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented once EHSD obtains access to view the NSS data. It is important to note that the Sheriff’s Office has “view only” access to the NSS data, so training would be limited to accessing the information only.
F7
EHSD does not have the resources to continually work with the Sheriff OES to coordinate, plan and keep updated the Mass Care and Shelter Plan.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
EHSD should consider periodic reviews of the currency of the data and make update recommendations and corrections to the American Red Cross after EHSD is granted access to view the NSS list.
F8
Sheriff OES does not have the resources to update all the operational planning and preparation plans as required by the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan. Response: Partially Disagree. It would be an extremely difficult and costly task for the Sheriff’s Office to continuously update the multitude of plans, policies and annexes currently administered by the OES Division in response to every update of Federal, State and/or regional plans. The Sheriff’s Office ensures that legally required document updates occur when required and facilitate the update of other planning documents as needed.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
Sheriff OES and American Red Cross should consider inviting EHSD to their regular meetings regarding earthquake planning and review of associated policies. Response: This recommendation has been implemented. EHSD currently coordinates quarterly meetings with Contra Costa County, American Red Cross (ARC), and the Sheriff’s OES staff. The meetings focus on identifying gaps and seeking resolution, creating or modifying processes to streamline coordination efforts, offering assistance to one another with tasks and projects, and facilitate effective communications among the team that will respond in a disaster. These meetings are effective in ensuring that all parties responding to a disaster as it relates to mass care and shelter are familiar with each other’s responsibilities and resources.
F9
Sheriff OES has no written procedures concerning selection, inspection and opening an emergency shelter. Response: Agree. This function is performed by the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD).
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
Sheriff OES should consider reviewing its plans to coordinate local jurisdictions, EHSD and the American Red Cross during an emergency, and develop procedures and provide training where deficiencies are identified. Response: This recommendation is being implemented. The Sheriff’s OES, ARC, EHSD, other County Departments and local jurisdictions meet from time to time and participate in exercises. All exercises are evaluated and lessons are learned. OES makes training available to the various entities. Contact: Jim Mellander Foreperson 925-608-2621 Contra Costa County Grand Jury Report 1702 Emergency Mass Care and Shelter Are We Ready? TO: Board of Supervisors, Office of the Sheriff
F10
Sheriff OES has no standard training program that covers how emergency shelters are selected, inspected, and opened. Response: Agree. This function is performed by EHSD.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
The Sheriff OES recognizes the American Red Cross makes non-binding prearrangements for shelters and lists the shelters on the FEMA sponsored database, National Shelter System (NSS). Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
Responsibility for determining whether a shelter is habitable and safe to use rests with the local jurisdiction or Sheriff OES. Response: Partially Disagree. The Sheriff’s OES Division supports shelter coordination, but the responsibility for habitability and safety is building inspection and environmental health function. Potential shelter sites must be inspected and approved by a city or county building inspector prior to use as a shelter. Schools must be inspected and approved by California Department of Architects before occupancy.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
Sheriff OES can view, but not edit, data in the NSS. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
EHSD does not have access to the NSS.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
Sheriff OES does not receive regularly scheduled reviews and updates of shelter sites in NSS from American Red Cross. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F16
Sheriff OES has not received a NSS based shelter report from the American Red Cross since 2008. Response: Agree.
No recommendations for this finding
F17
EHSD does not receive regularly scheduled reviews and updates of shelter sites in NSS from ARC.
No recommendations for this finding
F18
EHSD has not received a NSS based shelter report from the American Red Cross since 2008.
No recommendations for this finding