San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury
• 2008-2009
• Agency Response
A Summary of Responses to Recommendations of the 2008-2009 San Luis Obispo
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Conclusions 4
-
CL1“The quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial roles of the planning commission and the reasons why planning commissioner’s conduct in one role is not necessarily acceptable in the other role.” Response: The planning department implemented the recommendation.
-
CL2“The due process requirements and legal standards of conduct for quasi-judicial proceedings conducted by the planning commission, including but not limited to the right of an applicant to hear and respond to evidence being considered by the planning commissioners and the right to reasonably impartial, non-involved reviewers.” Response: This was implemented.
-
CL3“The reasons why ex parte contacts by planning commissioners have the potential to violate due process requirements.” Response: This was implemented.
-
CL4“Non-financial conflicts of interest such as loyalties to groups or organizations with positions on land use planning and regulation.” Response: The planning department said this was not warranted because state law does not prohibit planning commissioners from having such ties. 2009-2010 San Luis Obispo Grand Jury Page 14