📋

Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Shasta County Grand Jury • 2024-2025

Quartz Hill Subdivision Development: Transparency, Is It Clear?

View PDF View Full Original

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings 4 findings

F1 Page 55

Nearby area residents expressed concerns about The Peaks. Although there is no requirement for

F2 Page 55

There is currently a demand and need for Workforce Housing. Using available CDBG-DR

F3 Page 55

Since profit-oriented objectives of private developers may deviate from community-oriented

F4 Page 55

Due to an ongoing perceived lack of transparency by the City, residents near the Property remain

Recommendations 3

R1
Page 55

On or before July 1, 2025, the Redding City Council direct the City Manager to schedule an
R2
Page 55

On or before July 1, 2025, the Redding City Council direct the City Manager to integrate
R3
Page 55

On or before September 1, 2025, the Redding City Council direct the City Manager ensure the