Merced County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

Grand Jury Report 2015-2016*

Published: July 19, 2016 92 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F14, F15, F16, F17, F18, F19, F20, F21, F22, F23, F24, F25, F26, F27, F28, F29, F30, F31, F32, F33, F34, F35, F36, F37, F38, F39, F40

Findings and Recommendations 14 findings

F1
The Main Jail Facility is 47 years old and is outdated by current jail standards. Plans for integrating this facility with JLCC within the next few years will meet the current standards.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The MCCGJ recommends that the various organizations that are involved in dealing with homelessness in Merced County continue their outstanding work and that local governments continue to increase their support to address this issue and provide support to the CoC.
F2
The MCCGJ is pleased to see that new security cameras, a new communication/monitoring system and a full body scanner are in place. Collectively, these improvements will limit the amount of contraband that comes into the facility and provide extended monitoring of inmates in their cells.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The MCCGJ recommends that the City of Merced and Merced County continue to seek funds from federal and state government agencies that can be used to provide aid in combating homelessness in our area.
F3
The MCCGJ found a badly broken glass panel in the intake area Sober Cell. We were reassured that this panel does not present a risk to detainees or to officers.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
MCCGJ recommends that a follow-up process be established to ensure funds donated to non-profit organizations are used for the purpose requested.
F4
The facility appeared clean, organized and functional.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
MCCGJ recommends that all requests for approval on the Board Agenda should have attached supporting documentation regarding estimates, bids, or the cost of an event or item.
F5
The MCCGJ was impressed with the officers and the classification process of inmates. We recognize the Classification Officers' expertise and the importance of continual education in this difficult job.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
MCCGJ recommends that information be accessible on the County websites describing the availability of discretionary funds and how to apply for them.
F6
The Board Agenda Item form only provides for check marks indicating review and approval of discretionary fund expenditures.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
MCCGJ recommends in lieu of just checking a box on the "Board Agenda Item" form that signatures be required from the Auditor Controller, Chief Executive Officer, County Council, and Department of Public Works Administrator.
F7
Request for Special Board Project Funds form is not available on the County of Merced website.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
MCCGJ recommends that the process verifies an organization's non-profit status. REQUESTED RESPONSES Pursuant to Penal Code Section 933.05, the Civil Grand Jury requests responses as follows: Merced County Board of Supervisors INVITED RESPONSES Merced County Executive Office Merced County Counsel Merced County Controller's Office Merced County Department of Public Works CARRIED CONCEALED WEAPON (CCW) Internal Investigation 15-08-24
F8
The compliance order with the DDW will be in force until March 2025.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
The City of Los Banos has contracted with NAH on a pilot program to remove Chromium 6 from its water supply. NAH is a company specializing in metal powders and is working on a system that extracts Chromium 6 from ground water. Their intent is to utilize this extracted metal for use in its industrial endeavors.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
MCCGJ found through its investigation and interviews that the City of Los Banos is ahead of other cities in California specific to dealing with the problem of Chromium 6 in its water supply.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
The City has made the citizens of Los Banos aware of the Chromium 6 levels in its water supply as required by the State of California Water Quality Board Directives.
Related Recommendations (1)
R11
Katherine (Susan) Graf - Foreperson Pro-Tempore
F12
Although the amount of Chromium 6 in the Los Banos water supply is above standards approved by the State of California, the City has been given a waiver by the State to deal with the Chromium 6 levels as long as they continue to seek ways to lower the levels found in the water. The City of Los Banos developed a 20-year plan approved by the DDW to mitigate the
No recommendations for this finding
F13
level of Chromium 6 in the City's water system.
Related Recommendations (1)
R13
Roscoe H. P. (Jack) Jackson - Foreperson
F41 Page 16
The 2014-2015 MCCGJ recommended that JLCC install toilets, washbasins and drinking fountains in exercise areas per Title 24, Section 1231.2.10 of Board of State and Community Correction (BSCC) Minimum Standard for Local Detention Facilities. These areas will be renovated with funds received from the $40 million grant.
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 5

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.