📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Placer County Grand Jury
• 2004-2005
Gender Bias in Domestic Violence Cases
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 5 findings
F1
It is likely mistakes were made in the convictions of some men, and gender bias was indeed an important factor in those erroneous decisions. Response: I disagree with the finding because it infers that the Children's System of Care, CSOC, is the legal authority to convict individuals when in fact this is the duty and responsibility of the courts. It is outside the scope of the County Executive Office and the CSOC to determine whether or not mistakes were made in the convictions of some men and if gender bias was a factor in such decisions. The CSOC is involved in dependency court proceedings that involve domestic violence related to child abuse or neglect, however, its role in such cases is to provide services as directed by the courts, and not convictions.
F2
The prevailing perception among male domestic violence offenders was CPS (now CSOC) was the agency most troubling to them as a result of its gender bias, and they felt this had resulted in the most egregious errors. Response: I disagree with the finding. Based on an the internal review of the CSOC there appears to be no evidence to accept the finding that gender bias exists within the organization and there is no record of complaints filed alleging such behavior. Findings:
F3
All county agencies and all persons interviewed who worked for the county claimed a total lack of gender bias, but admitted there may have been some cultural assumptions among staff members that caused wrong judgements. Response: I disagree with the finding. According to the response of the HHS Director there is no evidence of the alleged gender bias and there have been no formal complaints submitted to the CSOC in this regard. Also, staff of the CSOC receive training as part of their educational curriculum to identify and understand the subject of gender bias. Findings:
F4
Attendees in the court mandated anger management group sessions are required to attend these sessions for 52 weeks and are required to pay for these sessions. Response: I disagree partially with the finding. The "anger management sessions" are actually a Batterer's Treatment Program and if the Dependency Court orders an individual into this program the CSOC pays for all of the program costs. If an individual is similarly ordered to participate in this program as a result of a criminal conviction of domestic violence then the individual must pay for the program costs. However, these costs are charged on a sliding scale based on the individual's ability to pay. Findings:
F5
The current official name for Child Protective Services, which is Children's System of Care, is difficult to find. The telephone accessibility of the Children's System of Care is difficult as well. 17
Recommendations 11
-
R1CSOC ensure their workers are well trained to recognize gender bias as a possibility in their domestic violence decision-making. Response: To be revised. The recommendation requires further analysis. Upon further discussion with the Grand Jury and receipt of information relative to the scope and details of their 379 Nevada Street Aubum, CA 95603 (530) 886-1870 FAX (530) 886-1810 rburton@placer.ca.gov • www.placer.ca.gov
-
R2Further investigation implemented by CSOC to continue the study of possible gender bias. Response: This recommendation is already in place in that CSOC has an established complaint process; staff are involved in on-going supervision; staff are involved in on-going training; and the court process ensures representation and due process for all parties.
-
R3The county share the cost of mandated attendance at anger management sessions, which should result in more attention to gender bias. Response: This recommendation is already in place. Dependency Court ordered attendance to the 52-week Batterer's Treatment Group is paid for by CSOC. Criminal Court ordered attendance to the Batterer's Treatment Group is not the responsibility of CSOC.
-
R4CSOC to better publicize its new name as the successor entity to CPS, and also, to achieve improved telephone accessibility. Response: The recommendation has not yet been fully implemented but will be implemented as public phone directories are updated. Directory listings and county-web site listings will cross- reference CPS and CSOC. A recent review of all incoming public phone lines determined that public callers are referred to ACCESS after hours, on weekends and holidays, in the event of a CPS or psychiatric emergency. The toll free number is 888-886-5401. Placer County Public Guardian 1. The management of the Public Guardian's Office has been neglected. Response: Do not agree with findings. Several changes have occurred in this office over the past two years. Due to unfortunate circumstances, first the secretary and then the supervisor went out on extended leave. Adult System's of Care (ASOC) management made efforts to assist the Public Guardians Office (PGO) by providing some help from the clerical pool and another ASOC supervisor to help manage the office on a part-time basis. These efforts allowed line staff to concentrate on client services, which remained and continue to remain a priority in the PGO. Staffing shortages have impaired Public Guardians Office. Response: Agree with these findings. Budget constraints have limited any staffing increases. Nevada Street ● Auburn, CA 95603 ● (530) 886-1870 ● FAX (530) 886-1810 rburton@placer.ca.gov • www.placer.ca.gov
-
R5The staffing shortage be corrected. Response: The recommendation requires further analysis. The current staffing shortage is a result of limited funding. However, we will continue to review the current staffing needs and look at ways to address identified needs as is practical and appropriate. The results of this review will be presented (with recommendations) to the appropriate administrative level of the Department of Health and Human Services for consideration.
-
R6The warehouse continues to be monitored for improvements. Response: The recommendation has been implemented. The warehouse is being, and will continue to be monitored for improvements, and will be identified in the Plan of Improvement. The Plan of Improvement will be submitted
-
R7The filing tasks be brought up to date. Response: The recommendation has been implemented. The filing has been addressed using extra help, and as of July 7, 2005, the filing has been brought up to date. We will continue to review the current staffing needs, including the need for additional clerical support, for the PGO. The purpose of this review will be to identify (and implement) a permanent solution to clerical support (including filing) for the PGO.
-
R8Standardized policies be implemented. Response: The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. The development of standardized policies, and policy implementation, will be addressed in the Plan of Improvement. The Plan of Improvement will be submitted
-
R9Job descriptions be developed. Response: The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. Job descriptions will be developed as a part of the Plan of Improvement. The Plan of Improvement will be submitted
-
R10Continued training of the PGO Supervisor. Response: The recommendation has been implemented. The supervisor has received training on Public Guardian issues and will continue this training during the next year.
-
R11Follow-up on the PGO situation by the 2005-2006 Grand Jury. Response: The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. In addition to the Plan of Improvement, Health and Human Services will provide two status reports to the Grand Jury in the next year. The schedule for report submission will be as follows: 379 Nevada Street • Auburn, CA 95603 • (530) 886-1870 • FAX (530) 886-1810 rburton@placer.ca.gov • www.placer.ca.gov