📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 3 findings
F1
Page 4
The ACSD board has money set aside to work on the short term tasks needed, and they are actively maintaining the equipment that they have to accomplish those tasks.
F2
Page 4
As with every district, the infrastructure will deteriorate. The Board needs to make plans for future replacements.
F3
Page 4
The Grand Jury is aware of resources that are available through the Department of Water Resources, the State Water Resources Control, and the Upper Pit River Watershed Alliance.
Recommendations 3
-
R1Page 4The ACSD Board should meet regularly to discuss and shape the issues facing them.
-
R2Page 4The ACSD Board and community should be aware of the long term needs of the district, and prepare for them.
-
R3Page 4The ACSD Board should seek alliances with the resources listed in F3 to facilitate the planning for future upgrades. Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals inter viewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the iden tity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.