⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 1 findings
F6
VTA Board Appointing Authority Groups 2 through 5 often do not follow VTA Administrative Code (Section 2-14) admonitions to “appoint individuals with appropriate experience and qualifications in transportation” and to “reappoint representatives to consecutive terms.” Response to Finding 6 As noted in the Civil Grand Jury Report, Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board member appointments are organized into six groups, of which Group 1 is the City of San Jose, Groups 2 through 5 comprise the remaining cities within Santa Clara County, and Group 6 is the County of Santa Clara. In this context, the County of Santa Clara does not have a response to Finding 6, as the finding excludes appointments by the County of Santa Clara, and the County lacks the authority, interest, or information necessary to evaluate cities’ adherence to VTA’s administrative guidelines.
Recommendations 1
-
R6VTA Board Appointing Authority Groups 2 through 5 should certify to the VTA Board that they will adhere to VTA Administrative Code (Section 2-14) admonitions, regarding Board member expertise and appointment to consecutive terms. This should be implemented by December 31, 2026. Response to Recommendation 6 As noted above, the County of Santa Clara is not part of Groups 2 through 5, and as such, has no response to