📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
San Francisco County Grand Jury
• 2014-2015
recommendations from the Boe."
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Recommendations 1
-
R1Page 10Recommendation No. 1-3a: “Promptly comply with the recommendations from the BOE.” According to the OAR staff, most of the 56 recommendations proposed in the 2002 BOE Assessment Practices Survey (based on fieldwork conducted in March through June 2001 and January through February 2002) have been implemented. However, based on BOE fieldwork conducted in August 2011, a few of the same problems still remain as reflected in the 34 recommendations and sub-recommendations of the 2013 BOE report, including the need to eliminate the backlog of assessable new construction. (See Appendices A and B.) The Jury looked more closely at all current BOE reports to see if any of the other California counties had significant backlog problems. “Backlog” is mentioned in only three other county reports. Only Trinity County seems to have any backlog problem, in their requests for informal review. Unlike San Francisco, no other county has a backlog severe enough to warrant a recommendation to eliminate it. Continuity Report on the OAR