📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 11 findings
F1
Page 447
Entry into the Inglewood Police Department for inspection proved to be difficult, even with a prior day’s call to announce the inspection. The CGJ was turned away; it took a telephone call to the Inglewood Police Chief to gain entry. This was the only city not allowing easy access to the jails.
F2
Page 447
The Temple City Sheriff’s Station staff stated that they have 5 custody assistants, enough to have one person guarding the inmates at all times but, for safety, they would prefer two guards at all times. This would require another 5 custody assistants, which they also stated could not always be justified by the number of inmates, which fluctuates daily.
F3
Page 447
Staff stated that the Pitchess Detention Center East Facility had cameras installed in jail dormitories in 2005. They said they have been very useful at recording the origin of incidences of violence amongst inmates. The cameras were a pilot program but have not yet been installed elsewhere to staff’s knowledge.
F4
Page 447
Maintenance, cleaning and painting issues were noted for six facilities: Long Beach Superior Court - Latex gloves were strewn over a wide area outside the men’s holding cells. There were holes in walls in two areas. The men’s multiple inmate holding cell had a foul odor. Narrow corridors were cluttered with boxes and trash. 2008-2009 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury Report 419 Metropolitan Traffic Court - The female holding tank had toilet paper plastered on the walls. Hallways were extremely crowded and dirty. Pasadena Court - The interior needs painting. Pico Rivera Station - Painting on floors and doors was unfinished. South Gate PD - Both the exterior and the interior need cleaning and maintenance. Southwest Area LAPD - The interior needs paint and better lighting; it is dark and dingy. The exterior needs better maintenance and debris removal.
F5
Page 448
Seven facilities had maintenance issues: Kenyon Juvenile Justice Center - Paint was flaking off the walls in the cells throughout. Camp Afflerbaugh - The Gymnasium was in dire need of paint. Camp Miller - The shower room and hand washing basin area was unsanitary and in need of plumbing repair. Camp Scott - Gopher holes in the athletic field prevented its use. Broken walkway pavement was dangerous. Camp Scudder - Gopher holes in the athletic field prevented its use. Camp Munz - The bathroom had plaster holes and broken windows. Camp Mendenhall - The drinking fountain near the dining room was inoperable, the gym stage was damaged, and the pavement by the gym was broken, dangerous and roped off.
F6
Page 448
Camps Miller, Kilpatrick, Holton and Routh did not have emergency generators.
F7
Page 448
Staff said that Camp Scott and Camp Scudder had difficulty evacuating during a recent fire due to a lack of buses. 420 2008-2009 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury Report
F8
Page 449
Camp Scott houses a large mental health facility while all female mental health patients receiving psychotropic medication are housed at nearby Camp Scudder. The Mental Health Director requested that the two camp populations be switched so that patients would be closer to their appropriate service needs.
F9
Page 449
Five Camps had laundry and related sanitation problems: Camp Miller had dozens of bags of backlogged, soiled laundry filled with clothing and bedding. Over 50 large black trash bags of laundry were found on one visit to Camp Miller, leaving the juvenile inmates, in some cases, without clean clothing. At Camps Mendenhall, Munz, Scott and Scudder staff stated that the juvenile inmates spent much of their day doing laundry instead of more productive activities. Machines at Miller, Munz, Mendenhall, Scott and Scudder were inadequate for the volume of laundry. Letters relative to the laundry problem at Camp Miller were sent by this CGJ to Robert B. Taylor, Chief Probation Officer, and to Doyle Campbell, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Public Safety, requesting correction of this situation as it posed an imminent health problem for the juvenile inmates. In addition, the previous year’s CGJ had found serious laundry and maintenance issues at Camp Miller which had not been corrected as of 12/1/08. No response was received by this CGJ to the letters requesting attention to this problem. Staff at Camp Miller said that they had on many occasions spoken with the Management Service Bureau but were unable to get an acceptable response to this problem. They had previously taken their laundry by truck to nearby Camp Gonzales but couldn’t continue to do so because their ratio of staff members to detainees would be in jeopardy.
F10
Page 450
The Challenger Camps have, according to the mental health practitioners on staff, a waiting list of 135 juvenile inmates requiring help. Staffing does not meet the need.
F11
Page 450
The CGJ is well aware of the “Memorandum of Agreement Between The United States and The County of Los Angeles Regarding The Los Angeles Probation Camps.” It is also aware of the appointment of the Monitor and the Monitoring Team, the deadlines for implementation plans and written policies, and the status report timing over the four year period of monitoring the implementation. This CGJ knows that practices to be corrected include juvenile justice and use of force, grievance systems, suicide prevention, and mental health assessment and care. However, inspection of the camps produced systemic evidence of management and organizational shortcomings as well as operational problems. Each and every camp had its own set of problems, indicative of the lack of consistent operational standards applied by Senior Management. It is this CGJ’s finding that each camp commander ran an independent fiefdom, whether by design or by necessity. There appeared to be a disparity of resources available to the different camp directors. Decentralization was the rule that governed the widespread inconsistency.
Recommendations 11
-
R1Page 447– Inglewood Police Department The Inglewood Police Department should instruct their supervisors and staff of the role and responsibilities of the CGJ for inspections under the California Administrative Code and Title 15, particularly since inspections by the CGJ occur annually at Sheriff and city- run jails.
-
R2Page 447– Sheriff’s Department The Sheriff’s Department should examine the need for additional staffing at Temple City based on the volume by day of inmates over a year’s time and determine if additional custody assistants could be added.
-
R3Page 447– Sheriff’s Department The Sheriff’s Department should examine the pilot program plan, determine if other facilities could benefit from cameras in protecting both the rights of staff and of inmates, and detail the related budget implications for other jails.
-
R4Page 448- Sheriff’s Department, Southgate PD, LAPD The above mentioned law enforcement agencies should schedule corrective measures and remedy these health and maintenance issues within the next quarter. Juvenile Detention Facilities
-
R5Page 448- Probation Camp supervisory personnel should schedule corrective measures with Internal Services Department (ISD) and remedy these maintenance issues within the next quarter. Senior departmental management should monitor execution of same.
-
R6Page 448- Probation The Chief Probation Officer should continue with the Department’s existing plan to install a generator for Camps Miller and Kilpatrick. The Chief Probation Officer within the next six months should proceed with a special use permit for U.S. Forestry land to install a generator at Camp Headquarters/Holton. Finally, the Chief Probation Officer should, within the next six months, install a generator at Camp Routh.
-
R7Page 449– Probation Within the next six months the Chief Probation Officer should formalize an agreement with the Sheriff to ensure availability of buses, or explore alternative options such as acquiring a fleet of appropriately configured vehicles to evacuate at least one full camp.
-
R8Page 449- Probation Senior management should review the proposal and implementation plan of the Mental Health Director at Camp Scott and determine the proposed cost, if any, of same within the next quarter.
-
R9Page 449- Probation A proposal for the resolution of the laundry should be developed by the Probation Department and presented to the Board of Supervisors within this quarter. Short term implementation of a proposed Sheriff’s Department centralized laundry system for all camps should be tested for these camps within the quarter. 2008-2009 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury Report 421
-
R10Page 450- Probation An analysis of the mental health staffing needs at the Challenger Camps should be completed within the quarter, specifically to fulfill the requirements of the “Memorandum of Agreement Between the United States and the County of Los Angeles Regarding The Los Angeles Probation Camps.” The memorandum of agreement requires implementation plans due 120 days from the agreement signing (October 31, 2008) and written policies due 180 days from the agreement signing. That would make documentation due in spring (April, May) 2009.
-
R11Page 450– Board of Supervisors The CGJ does not believe that it is solely sufficient to correct the practices in the Youth Camps as the Justice Department requires. The CGJ recommends that the Board of Supervisors initiate a thorough review of the Probation Department senior management and their management practices related to the Los Angeles Probation Camps. This examination should include reporting structure, operational standards, accountability measures, shared best practices, and performance reviews. This should be accomplished within this calendar year and coincide with the development of the Justice Department monitoring process. A more effective management structure should be the result. 422 2008-2009 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury Report Exhibit I DETENTION FACILITIES INSPECTION REPORT by the JAILS COMMITTEE of the )_______________________________________________________ (2)_______________________________________________________ (3)_______________________________________________________ Rating Compliant Non-Compliant Staffing Emergency Procedures Mental Health Education/Vocational Training Restraints Sanitation Segregation Biomedical/Behavioral Research Healthcare/Triage/Safety GENERAL APPEARANCE & COMMENTS ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Exhibit I 424 2008-2009 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury Report Exhibit I 426 2008-2009 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury Report SPEAKERS AND EVENTS COMMITTEE Peter Doctorow–Chair Nora Clark–Vice Chair Stephanie Alexander Robert W. Chu A Report by the Los Angeles County 2008-2009 Civil Grand Jury SPEAKERS AND EVENTS COMMITTEE