Riverside County Grand Jury
• 2004-2005
Flood Control and Water Conservation District
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
The District’s principal source of general-purpose revenue is from a 1% assessed value property tax. Revenue history over the past ten (10) years shows an increase of 64.6%, ($17,385,000 in 1995 to a projected $27,762,500 in 2004/2005). This projected increase is due to the population explosion in the county over the past ten years.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Board of Supervisors should reduce the 1% tax that was initiated in 1945, to mirror the increase in population and the near completion of a major portion of the flood control infrastructure. 2
F2
The 1945 California statute establishing the Riverside Flood Control and Water Conservation District states that the monies collected by said taxes shall be used in the zones from which they are collected. Per the Director, the Flood Control and Water Conservation District currently operates on the basis that money may be loaned from one zone to another zone if repaid within the current fiscal year. However, the statute does not prohibit the Board of Supervisors from extending a loan for up to five (5) years. San Bernardino County currently uses a three-year policy for repayment to the loaning zone(s).
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors consider changing its policy whereby the seven (7) zones can loan monies from one zone to another for more than the current year, i.e. up to five (5) years, to make available funds more flexible.
F3
The flood control districts in San Bernardino, San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, Kern and Inyo Counties report through the public works departments. The Flood Control District and Transportation & Land Management Agency (TLMA) (Riverside County’s Public Works Department), perform similar functions, i.e. land management, design and construction, surveying and mapping services. Duplication often occurs in the use of equipment, personnel and facilities. As the county population grows and possible satellite facilities are added, this duplication will be magnified.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors implement a task force to study the merits of merging TLMA and Flood Control facilities, equipment, and personnel as demonstrated in surrounding counties.
F4
When the Flood Control and Water Conservation District was created in 1945, the primary emphasis was on flood control, the building of dams, storm channels, drains, etc. According to the Director of Flood Control, “…the major drainage infrastructure needs of the County and its cities have not been completely met, they are beginning to diminish…” The Director also stated, “The District’s future efforts in water conservation should be greatly enhanced.” However, as of June 1, 2005 the Director has not published a timeline for shifting the emphasis to water conservation.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Flood Control direct hiring to include specialists in water conservation, i.e. chemical, environmental engineering, etc. Report Delivered: 06/27/05 Report Public: 06/29/05 Report Response Due: 09/26/05 3