📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Santa Cruz County Grand Jury • 2021-2022

_x_ Agree __ Partially Disagree __ Disagree Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): There are

Published: November 15, 2022 12 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F3, F5, F6, F9, F10, F11

Findings 5 findings

F2 Page 94
There is an urgent need to create a county-wide drought-resilient water storage and delivery infrastructure. __ AGREE __ PARTIALLY DISAGREE _X_ DISAGREE Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): The urgency for, and availability of, drought resilient water projects varies significantly throughout the County. There is not a simple one-size-fits-all solution as this finding implies. Through the projects already underway, the water supply agencies are making significant progress at tackling water supply security.
F4 Page 94
Establishing a strategic groundwater reserve, as described in documents from the City of Santa Cruz, is a well-understood and achievable first step. __ AGREE _X_ PARTIALLY DISAGREE __ DISAGREE Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): This Finding does not describe what the “establishment of a groundwater reserve” is a first step in achieving. The MGA does identify “maintaining a drought reserve” as part of the Sustainability Goal included in the Groundwater Sustainability Plan. The Groundwater Sustainability Plan outlines several critical projects that should happen concurrently for the Basin to reach sustainability, not one before the other as the Finding implies. One of these projects is the City of Santa Cruz Water Department’s Aquifer Storage and Recovery project in the Mid-County Basin. The Pure Water Soquel Project is another. [Return to Table of Contents] 2021–2022 Consolidated Final Report with Responses 87
F7 Page 95
Existing City of Watsonville and City of Santa Cruz wastewater resources are only partially utilized to address passive well resting and saltwater intrusion issues. _X_ AGREE __ PARTIALLY DISAGREE __ DISAGREE Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): The MGA agrees that the City of Santa Cruz wastewater resources are not fully utilized. The MGA is not directly involved with the City of Watsonville and Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency on their wastewater resources and cannot respond to that item. Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury
F8 Page 104
Each agency described in this report communicates well with neighboring agencies, but collaboration is limited and narrow in scope. __ AGREE _X_ PARTIALLY DISAGREE __ DISAGREE Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): We partially disagree with this finding because, while we agree that the water agencies in Santa Cruz County typically communicate well, we don’t agree that the collaboration is “limited and narrow in scope”. The collaboration between agencies is ongoing and expanding. The breadth of collaboration varies depending on the alignment of each individual agency’s activities in support of their objectives and strategic work plan. There is a clear trend toward more comprehensive collaboration among larger groups of stakeholders. The proposed projects and management actions in the Santa Margarita Groundwater Agency’s (SMGWA) Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) are evidence of the extensive collaboration between San Lorenzo Valley Water District (SLVWD), Scotts Valley Water District (SVWD), the County and the City of Santa Cruz Water Department (SCWD). As initial steps in those collaborations, SVWD and SCWD applied for and received grant funding to construct a pipeline that will enable water supplies to be managed more efficiently across the region, and SLVWD and SCWD signed an agreement to cooperate regarding the process to enable SLVWD to exercise its contractual right to Loch Lomond water and are currently in discussions on how to advance this project. SMGWA is working on the implementation of its GSP agreeing on the approach of advancing a suite of projects (conjunctive use, aquifer storage and recovery, purified recycled water recharge) to be further investigated by SLVWD, SCWD and SVWD.
F12 Page 93
There is no county-level agency chartered to plan, propose, or build regional district-spanning drought-resilience infrastructure. _X_ AGREE __ PARTIALLY DISAGREE __ DISAGREE Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): There are many agencies that collectively span the entire County, and there have been county-level efforts for decades to help our region become more water secure. Another county-level agency is not necessary, and potentially not even desirable, due to the proven collaborative efforts of the local water agencies and the high cost of creating and running an agency. Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury ADDITIONAL FINDINGS (invited responses from the Mid- County Groundwater Agency Point of Contact)

Recommendations 3