⚠️ Translation Notice:
This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations
7 findings
In several instances, the Material Weaknesses, Significant Deficiencies and other deficiencies were repeated from one year to the next by the external auditors without being remedied.
No recommendations for this finding
Weaknesses in Internal Controls could ultimately result in financial losses, loss of public confidence (reputational risk), inaccurate or faulty financial reporting and decision- making based on incomplete or inaccurate information.
No recommendations for this finding
Several of the entities reviewed showed issues (including Material Weaknesses/Significant Deficiencies) with respect to compliance with grants which they have been awarded.
No recommendations for this finding
Unresolved problems with grants could potentially result in the loss of future grants and required repayment of expended grant funds. Where repayment of grant funds is required, unrelated general fund resources are being used. This can result in a loss of public confidence (reputational risk).
No recommendations for this finding
There is a significant difference among County Organizations as to the level of importance placed on the control and grant compliance findings of the outside auditors and need to remedy, on a timely basis, the issues noted.
Related Recommendations (1)
County Organizations maintain or add audit report results to appropriate financial managements' performance goals to ensure that such individuals are held accountable for promptly remedying deficiencies identified in audit reports, and consider the legality of maintaining or adding such performance goals on audit reports to financial managements' evaluations.
Many of the entities reviewed had communications from the auditors indicating that a significant number of audit adjustments were required to the financial statements as prepared by the organization. This may suggest that monthly or interim information prepared during the year was incorrect, potentially impacting budgetary controls and/or information presented to management/governing boards for decision-making or oversight purposes.
No recommendations for this finding
Based on the entities reviewed, the County Board of Supervisors, the City Councils, and the governing boards in the case of school districts and special districts, are not providing adequate oversight over the entities that they govern to ensure that Material Weaknesses, Significant Deficiencies and other deficiencies in regard to Internal Controls and outside grant compliance are being remedied in a timely manner. Most County Organizations do not have an Audit Committee, independent of the organization's financial management, which is chartered to provide financial oversight. Contra Costa County 2012-2013 Grand Jury ASSESSING FISCAL RISK A recurring finding by the independent auditors with respect to school districts related to the need for improved controls over "Associated Student Body Funds" - the various student clubs and organizations for which the districts have financial oversight and accounting responsibility. The improved control recommendations involved controls over cash receipts, timely accounting and reconciliation of funds held by the organizations and controls over disbursements. Continued and significant problems in this area could result in both losses and negative publicity (reputational risk).
Related Recommendations (1)
The County Organizations improve direct financial oversight and assessment of the control environment including: The Board of Supervisors more actively provide oversight in the case of the County a. and appoint a formal Audit Committee from among their members to ensure that Internal Control and grant compliance deficiencies are promptly remedied and there are sufficient direct and detailed discussions between the Board and the outside auditors. b. The City Councils more actively provide oversight by appointing an Audit Committee from among their members as well as an ad hoc citizens' committee to ensure that Internal Control deficiencies are promptly remedied. c. The governing boards of school districts appoint a formal Audit Committee from among their members and provide direct oversight to district operating and financial management to ensure that Internal Control deficiencies are promptly remedied. d. The governing boards of special districts appoint a formal Audit Committee from among their members and provide direct oversight to district operating and financial management to ensure that Internal Control deficiencies are promptly remedied. In instances where the size of the entity precludes an adequate segregation of duties, governing board members need to consider direct involvement in key financial processes. The Superintendent of the County Office of Education continue to provide e. oversight over governing boards of school districts and continue to use the power of this office to compel remediation of Internal Control deficiencies. f. LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) encourage governing boards of special districts to promptly remedy Internal Control deficiencies that are identified. The Board of Supervisors have the County internal audit staff report directly to the g. Board of Supervisors rather than the Auditor Controller. The governing boards of Contra Costa County 2012-2013 Grand Jury ASSESSING FISCAL RISK other County Organizations have the internal audit groups of other County Organizations maintain their independence and not report to financial management but instead to the City Council in the case of cities and the governing boards in the case of school districts and special districts.
No Responses Found
24
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.