📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

San Mateo County Grand Jury • 2022-2023

Issue Are some San Mateo County communities misusing Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) to avoid the

Published: June 12, 2023 11 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 7 findings

F1 Page 71
Due to recent changes in California ADU-related laws, local governments cannot condition ADU permits in San Mateo County on complying with affordability monitoring and verification. Response: The City of Foster City agrees with this finding.
F2 Page 71
San Mateo County and most of its municipalities rely on ADUs to meet their affordable housing commitments in their RHNA-6 plans. Response: The City of Foster City partially agrees with this finding. While the City of Foster City counts ADUs to meet affordable housing commitments in RHNA, it is one of many strategies. Specifically, the City of Foster City has a total lower income housing RHNA of 819 and ADUs make up only 14 of these.
F3 Page 71
Atherton, Hillsborough, Portola Valley, and Woodside rely on ADUs to meet as much as 80 percent of their affordable housing commitments in their RHNA-6 plans. Response: The City of Foster City is not named in this finding and therefore has no comment.
F4 Page 71
HCD has instructed San Mateo County jurisdictions to monitor and verify future ADU production and affordability every two years but has yet to specify how to verify whether very low-, low- or moderate-income households are occupying the ADUs as planned. Response: The City of Foster City partially agrees with this finding. Every year, HCD requires jurisdictions to submit an Annual Progress Report (APR) that includes details regarding its DocuSign Envelope ID: B9F958C2-E09A-4626-9294-A738C1988BD2 housing production and Foster City has been submitting APR annually to HCD. The City has included a program in its Housing Element, H-D-4-h: ADU Monitoring, “The City shall track new ADUs (at single-family and multifamily sites) and collect information on the use and affordability of these units in each Annual Progress Report. Biannually through the projection period (beginning in 2025), if determined that at least 50% units are not meeting a lower-income housing need, the City shall adopt additional incentives to facilitate ADUs.” Another program in the Housing Element that will help in monitoring and verifying ADU production is H-G-2-e, Rental Registry: “Unless a requirement for a State rental registry is adopted, explore a rental registry that tracks information such as rents, utilities, accessibility for disabled persons, tenant occupancy dates, and landlord contact information in order to improve the information available to landlords, tenants, and decision makers.” The Rental Registry would be for all rental units (including ADUs) to track occupancy, rents etc. The City of Foster City is planning on supporting a regional ADU monitoring effort through the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) or 21 Elements, a long-standing collaboration among the 21 jurisdictions of San Mateo County.
F5 Page 72
Other than Brisbane and Redwood City, San Mateo County and its jurisdictions have yet to articulate how they will monitor and verify ADU production or affordability. Response: The City of Foster City partially agrees with this finding. Regarding ADU production, every year as part of the process for preparing the APR for HCD, the staff gathers information on housing production, including ADUs. Regarding affordability, the City has included programs in its Housing Element, H-D-4-h: ADU Monitoring and H-G-2-e, Rental Registry (noted in F4). In addition, San Mateo County jurisdictions met on June 20, 2023, to discuss potential strategies for monitoring ADU affordability levels. The City of Foster City is planning to support a regional ADU monitoring effort through ABAG or 21 Elements.
F6 Page 72
Without effective ADU monitoring and verification, it will be impossible to evaluate whether the jurisdictions are meeting their RHNA-6 obligations for very-low-, low-, and moderate-income housing units. Response: The City of Foster City does not agree with this finding. Foster City has only projected 24 ADUs in its sites inventory of 1,896 units which is very minimal and will be able to demonstrate meeting its RHNA-6 obligation for very-low-, low-, and moderate-income housing units through housing production reflected in the future APRs. Also, there is a buffer of 72 units in extremely low, 90 units in very low, and 15 units in moderate income categories included in the sites inventory of the Housing Element. Theoretically, Foster City can still fully meet its RHNA obligations for every affordability category without a low-income ADU being provided. However, the City of Foster City is planning to implement ADU monitoring and support a regional approach to monitoring ADU affordability.
F7 Page 72
ADU affordability and occupancy could be monitored by agencies such as HIP Housing which has proven systems and processes to verify occupancy of deed- restricted rental properties in San Mateo County. DocuSign Envelope ID: B9F958C2-E09A-4626-9294-A738C1988BD2 Response: The City of Foster City agrees with this finding. HIP is one potential partner agency. However, it shall be noted that Foster City do not have a high proportion of ADUs in their sites inventory for RHNA-6. Response to Recommendations:

Recommendations 6