Riverside County Grand Jury
• 2014-2015
Riverside County Code Enforcement Department
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 7 findings
F1
County Code Enforcement suffers from a systemic lack of supervision of its field Code Enforcement personnel. Field Code Enforcement personnel self-schedule their daily activities, and are not required to maintain an accounting of the time and location of their daily activities. This lack of supervision is conducive to abuse of County time and resources. CalRecycle Waste Tire Grant Program Supervision
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Re-evaluate the supervisory responsibilities and structure of the entire Code Enforcement Department to ensure that consistent oversight is obtained. Supervisors with direct responsibility over field personnel shall require the completion of a daily field activity log which chronicles the officers’ activities. The log shall consist of, but not limited to, time, location, type of activity, and disposition of each log entry. The logs shall be reviewed daily by the respective supervisor for accuracy. Supervisors shall make unannounced visits to field CEOs and obtain real time knowledge of their activities. Supervisors shall, in accordance with their job description, which states in part: …assign, review and evaluate the work performed by Code Enforcement personnel; direct day-to-day operations of the Code Enforcement function; create and assign work schedules as outlined in their job description. CalRecycle Waste Tire Grant Program Supervision
F2
There is a full-time supervisor assigned to the Tire Grant Program; however, only 40 hours of supervision time is charged or billed to the 2 Program per year. The Supervisor of the Tire Grant Program stated his supervisory philosophy is to allow the people he supervises to “self- manage” themselves; and therefore, they require and receive very little oversight. This lack of supervision leads to abuse of County time and resources. CalRecycle Waste Tire Grant Program Agreement
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
To further enhance the efficiency of the operation of their organization, the supervisor assigned to the Tire Grant Program shall not be limited to waste tire activities only, but assigned additional code enforcement duties and responsibilities. The supervisor shall monitor employees on a regular basis to stop abuse of County time. CalRecycle Waste Tire Grant Program Agreement
F3
The Tire Grant Program operates as an agreement with the State of California (State). The State, in its agreement, allows up to four hours per waste tire inspection. Most on-site tire inspections require much less time, some as little as 15 minutes. It is noted in the Tire Enforcement Grant Program Agreement (TEA 18-10-14) that inspection research, report writing, and actual time spent inspecting are included as part of the 3 ½ hours billed, but most on-site inspections are completed in one hour or less. Since the State is billed at 3 ½ hours per inspection, Tire Grant Program personnel are only tasked to perform three inspections per day. Testimony from some field CEOs has revealed they are “bored” with little to do at times. As a result, Tire Grant Program personnel are underutilized. Training
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Code Enforcement Officers assigned to the Tire Grant Program shall not be limited to waste tire activities only, but assigned additional Code Enforcement responsibilities. Training
F4
Code Enforcement Policies and Procedures do not reflect any mandated training/certification requirements or subsequent in-service training, which leads to inconsistencies in code enforcement practices. All training is optional except for California Penal Code §832, which is titled, Course of training prescribed by commission on peace officer standards and training; examination; necessity to exercise powers; exemptions; examination fees. Communications
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
In lieu of the California Penal Code §832 Training, County Code Enforcement shall mandate a 40-hour Officer Training Program as offered by the California Association of Code Enforcement Officers. This training includes: Ethics, Basic Inspection Protocols, Vehicle Abatement, Drug Recognition and Gang Awareness, Abatement of Substandard Housing and Dangerous Buildings, Case Preparation for Administration, and Civil & Criminal Cases. County Code Enforcement shall establish training for all supervisors focused on the oversight of CEO’s duties and responsibilities to increase accountability. Communications
F5
There is no practice of regularly scheduled staff meetings among the CEOs to facilitate the dissemination of County Code Enforcement related information, as outlined in the Policies and Procedures Manual. Operating Procedures
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
County Code Enforcement shall mandate regularly scheduled staff meetings conducted by supervisors or department heads to facilitate the dissemination of information to CEOs. Operating Procedures
F6
The County Code Enforcement Policies and Procedures Manual is incomplete and outdated. The manual does not adequately reflect the current procedures nor communication equipment available to field personnel (e.g., handie – talkie). Various sections of the manual are seven to eight years old. County Counsel Interference
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The County Code Enforcement Policies and Procedures Manual shall be reviewed and revised to reflect current practices. County Counsel Interference
F7
During the course of this investigation regarding abuses and deficiencies in the Code Enforcement Department, the Grand Jury encountered interference from the Riverside County Office of County Counsel (County Counsel). County Counsel has directed all County department heads to advise their subordinates to obtain legal representation from his office for sworn interviews, as well as screening of any documentation prior to complying with Grand Jury requests. County Counsel has taken the position that his office has the legal responsibility to represent all County employees in any matters involving the Riverside County Civil Grand Jury. The Grand Jury is tasked with examining County departments for possible improprieties or inefficiencies pursuant to California Penal Code §925. Efforts by County Counsel to hinder the examination process and impede transparency are not beneficial to the citizens of the County of Riverside.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors shall instruct County Counsel to comply with California Penal Code §925 titled, County officers, departments or functions; operations, accounts and records; investigations and reports. Report Issued: 06/10/2015 Report Public: 06/12/2015 Response Due: 09/08/2015 6