Orange County Grand Jury • 2017-2018

Orange County

Published: June 26, 2018 269 pages Consolidated Report
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 3 findings

F8
Orange County cities and the County have engaged in blaming and finger-pointing, hampering the collaborative efforts needed to site, finance, and maintain Permanent Supportive Housing. 2017-2018 Orange County Grand Jury 2017-2018 Orange County Grand Jury Where There’s Will, There’s a Way Where There’s Will, There’s a Way The Grand Jury identified issues within each of the four components listed above, including the following: cities at odds over whether to allow homeless housing, disagreements over who FINDINGS should lead development efforts for homeless housing, and even conflicts over whether PSH is In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2017-2018 Grand Jury the best solution for the chronically homeless. requires (or, as noted, requests) responses from each agency affected by the findings presented in Officials in many cities have not reached consensus among themselves on the value of PSH, this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. making it difficult to create compelling arguments and a unified front to overcome resident Based on its investigation titled “Where There’s Will, There’s a Way: Housing Orange County’s opposition to siting these units within their communities. County officials only recently Chronically Homeless,” the 2017-2018 Orange County Grand Jury has arrived at ten principal acknowledged they hold lead responsibility for homeless housing in Orange County. Until findings, as follows: consensus is achieved on these issues, the County and cities will not be able to overcome the many roadblocks to building more PSH in Orange County.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Cities have taken a silo approach to developing Permanent Supportive Housing, resulting in inefficient leveraging and pooling of funds across municipal borders. In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2017-2018 Grand Jury
No recommendations for this finding
F10
There is no established, independent leadership body in the County empowered to address requires (or, as noted, requests) responses from each agency affected by the recommendations regional homeless issues in an effective manner. presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. Based on its investigation titled “Where There’s Will, There’s a Way: Housing Orange County’s Chronically Homeless,” the 2017-2018 Orange County Grand Jury makes the following nine
No recommendations for this finding

Conclusions 89

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Orange County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office