Score: +4 (6/0/2)
Stanislaus County Grand Jury • 2022-2023

Stanislaus County 2022-2023 Grand Jury Final Report

Published: June 30, 2020 308 pages Consolidated Report
View Original PDF

Findings 14 findings

F1 Page 20
In the latter part of 2021, half of OPD patrol officers were out of compliance with mandated DV training pursuant to state law.17
F2 Page 20
As of January 1, 2023, a minimum of four out of fourteen OPD patrol officers were out of compliance with mandated training (CPT, PSP, DV) pursuant to state law and POST regulations.18
F3 Page 20
OPD did not maintain a detailed record of the reason(s) for non-compliance with POST regulatory mandates due to Covid-19 concerns, as recommended by POST Bulletin No. 2020-14. 15 https://post.ca.gov/Training-Managers 16 https://leftasystems.org/products/fto-software-lefta/ 17 CPC § 13519(g), CCR 1081 18 CPC § 13519, CCR 1005, CCR 1081
F4 Page 21
OPD’s continued failure to require its patrol officers to complete continuing professional training courses (CPT, PSP), as mandated by state law and POST regulations, could jeopardize OPD’s good standing with POST.
F5 Page 21
The failure to keep OPD patrol officers in compliance with training as mandated by state law and POST regulations makes it possible that the citizens of Oakdale may, on occasion, suffer from less effective policing.
F6 Page 21
OPD lacks internal enforcement by management of its Training Policy No. 203.
F7 Page 21
OPD does not follow its Training Policy No. 203, as its Training Committee does not meet on a regular basis.
F8 Page 21
OPD’s Training Policy No. 203, which includes a list of excused absences from mandatory training, is missing Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 and military leave.
F9 Page 21
OPD’s Master Training Plan does not include domestic violence mandated training in its “Police Officer, Field Services” classification.
F10 Page 35
SCAS has a poor response time to phone calls and emails.
F11 Page 35
SASA Advisory Committee is currently not functioning.
F12 Page 35
SASA lacks a current budget subcommittee.
F13 Page 35
SCAS has no long-term plan for meeting the increasing demands of the shelter.
F14 Page 147
The City has a tiered rate * * * structure, i.e., per unit water costa more the more one uses. Conclusion The 2022-2023 SCCGJ is satisfied the Modesto City Council submitted a detailed response within the timeframe stipulated by California Penal Code §955(c). * - not applicable #8 .. Honorable Robert B. Westbrook Presiding Judge Stanislaus County Superior Court PO Box 3488 Modesto, California 95353 Dear Judge Westbrook: The City of Modesto appreciates the opportunity to respond to the findings and recommendations of the Civil Grand Jury's final report: The Future of Urban Water Supply and Demand, Case #22-07GJ The City Council reviewed and approved the responses below at its September 13, 2022 meeting. Civil Grandy Jury Findings and Recommendations:

Recommendations 12

Conclusions 211

Commendations 1

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.