24 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Among obstacles to using more recycled water are: determining who will pay for installing the necessary infrastructure and distribution system; finding a willing customer; and minimizing the financial and legal impacts to the current potable water purveyor.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R1
The Board of Supervisors should consider facilitating (possibly through a Task Force) the formation of a JPA to promote water recycling, stormwater capture and desalination projects.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F2
Water purveyors and wastewater processors can share water treatment costs and revenues under a JPA.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R2
CCCSD and CCWD should explore the feasibility of cooperatively developing an IPR Injection Well Project.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F3
State matching grants and low-interest loans are available for small indirect potable reuse projects, which could potentially increase water supply.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R3
CCCSD, CCWD, and DSRSD should consider the formation of a JPA to expand CCCSD's tertiary treatment capacity in order to free up fresh water for domestic and commercial customers.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F4
Indirect potable reuse projects are ideal for areas in the County where other new water sources are unavailable.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R4
The Board of Supervisors should consider directing that priority be given to capture and reuse of stormwater where possible in all new County flood control projects.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F5
It is difficult to develop large recycled water projects without the cooperation and commitment of water purveyors and customers.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R5
The Board of Supervisors should consider adopting ordinances that promulgate recycling and recovery of water on a County-wide basis.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F6
Where recycled water can be wheeled to one customer, it could "free up" an equivalent amount of fresh water that could then be wheeled to another customer who might be willing to pay more, thus creating "win-win" results for recycled water projects.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R6
The city should consider adopting requirements relating to the use of reclaimed water for planned communities and large commercial buildings to maximize its use.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F7
While stormwater capture and reuse has potential for contributing to the County's long-term water needs, the County has focused on NPDES compliance.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R7
The district should consider facilitating the use of satellite wastewater treatment plants, where appropriate.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F8
Contra Costa County and its cities could adopt water saving and recycling ordinances for large commercial buildings, similar to those adopted in other large urban locations such as San Francisco.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R8
The Board of Supervisors should consider adopting a County goal to exceed the State average for recycled water use and establish a target date.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F9
Satellite wastewater treatment plants are feasible in situations where the user is distant from existing recycled water distribution systems, needs water for irrigation, and is able to meet the costs to build and operate the plant.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R9
The County and Districts should consider meeting to discuss each District's need for land for demonstration of scaled-up recycling and desalination projects using green technologies, which may qualify for State grant money, and the County's ability to lease such land.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F10
The County is below the State average in use of recycled water.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R10
To promote public awareness and citizen involvement, the Board of Supervisors should consider establishing a citizen's "Water Reuse Advisory Council" which includes citizen stakeholders and technology experts to advise them on all water reuse issues affecting the County.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F11
Desalination technology continues to evolve, including smaller scale solar powered and HDH ("Dewvaporation") pilot plants, although neither has been developed to full commercialization.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R11
The Board of Supervisors should consider designating a single point of contact within County government for water recycle/reuse issues or establishing a permanent water sustainability subcommittee under their Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee to advise the committee on water reuse issues.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F12
Citizen involvement (possibly through an Advisory Council) is a key to getting buy-in for recycle and IPR/DPR projects because it is citizens who pay for, consume, and depend on a reliable source of pure water.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F13
There is no single point of contact for water recycle and reuse issues in the County.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0