Orange County Grand Jury • 2022-2023

2022-2023 Grand Jury Final Report

Published: January 27, 2023 408 pages Consolidated Report
View Original PDF

Findings 17 findings

F1 Page 31
Many children experiencing homelessness are not identified as such, and therefore do not receive the support and benefits authorized by the McKinney-Vento Act.
F2 Page 31
The lack of mandatory McKinney-Vento Act training of school site office staff, counselors, and teachers contributes to a failure to identify children experiencing homelessness.
F3 Page 31
There is disparity in the application of McKinney-Vento regulations across Orange County public school districts which results in unequal access to educational benefits for children experiencing homelessness.
F4 Page 31
The majority of McKinney-Vento Liaisons are in full-time positions, but because their work includes multiple non-McKinney-Vento responsibilities, most do not have sufficient time to do the work required by the McKinney-Vento Act.
F5 Page 31
Many McKinney-Vento Liaisons lack needed experience due to a high turnover rate in those positions.
F6 Page 31
McKinney-Vento Act training is not mandatory for the majority of McKinney-Vento Liaisons.
F7 Page 31
Students experiencing homelessness who are enrolled in an elementary district often do not continue to receive McKinney-Vento benefits when they move to a high school district because the Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) prevents the sharing of this information between districts.
F8 Page 31
McKinney-Vento funds depend on school districts submitting grant proposals, but not all districts have employees trained in writing grant applications, resulting in missed funding opportunities.
F9 Page 31
School districts that do not apply for grants which fund programs benefitting children experiencing homelessness miss potential revenue opportunities.
F10 Page 31
McKinney-Vento is an unfunded federally mandated program; however, school districts which qualify and apply for Title I, Part A funds may obtain revenues that can be used The ABC’s of Educating Children Experiencing Homelessness in Orange County for children experiencing homelessness. These funds are insufficient to meet the needs of the school districts supporting children experiencing homelessness.
F11 Page 32
A lack of reliable transportation for children experiencing homelessness often results in chronic tardiness and absenteeism.
F12 Page 32
Chronic Absenteeism Rates of Homeless Students are disproportionately high in comparison with the Chronic Absenteeism Rates of All Students and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students.
F13 Page 32
Children experiencing homelessness in Orange County perform at a lower level on standardized tests and have a lower graduation rate than All Students and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students.
F14 Page 32
The percent of Homeless Students graduating who failed to meet state standards on English Language Arts and Math tests. is significantly higher than it is for All Students and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students.
F15 Page 32
There is a tendency by school districts to operate in isolation, which prevents productive collaboration on addressing the issue of children experiencing homelessness and the challenges of their education.
F16 Page 32
A significant lack of affordable permanent housing contributes to many families being caught in the cycle of homelessness.
F17 Page 129
The OC County Counsel’s office misstated to the Grand Jury the scope of its commitment to serving and assisting the Grand Jury in its investigations into County governance respecting managing conflicts between the Board of Supervisors, OC departments and agency clients, and the Grand Jury. I 2023 Gimme Shelter and a Pound of Advice

Recommendations 2

Conclusions 16

Commendations 7