⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 2 findings
F01
The current complaint log combines calls for animal services as well as complaints against the department.
F02
Volunteers play a vital role in the care and comfort of the animals in the shelters.
Recommendations 6
-
11-16Page 5Develop a plan to increase public awareness of the benefits of
-
R11-16through 11-20 7/18/11 Animal Services H:\home\Olansang\mpr\responseprioritylevels.doc LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 1 Misc. Patrol Services Isolation of Biting Animal for Rabies Examination LEVEL 4 Restraint of Animal Sick/Minor Injury animal Relinquished Animal Animal Welfare Major Injury to Animal Wild Animal Confined Stray Animal Dogs Harassing Livestock Fighting Animals Threat from Wild Animal Possible Rabid/Biter Animal ATTACHMENT A Animal Inside Vehicle Cruelty Threatening Dangerous Animal Priority Level TYPE OF SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES within 72 hours of receipt. Fourth priority; response objective is within 24 hours of receipt. within 12 hours of receipt. Second priority; response objective is First priority; officer response is ASAP Third priority; response objective is RESPONSE PRIORITY LEVELS Response Guidelines IN PROGRESS S S w w w w 2 2 _ RESPONSE PRIORI exceed the time period guidelines and available officers. Some requests upon the number and location of calls initial and/or fo for service may be unserviced and some Actual response times vary depending llow-up responses may TY LEVEL NOTE PROGRESS NOTIN N/A N/A N/A 4 w 4 S
-
11-17Page 5Develop a plan to increase public awareness of the coupons available
-
11-18Page 5Develop a plan to increase public awareness of micro-chipping
-
11-19Page 5Divide the complaint logs into two parts, one for problems requesting
-
11-20Page 5Provide all Animal Control Officers in the field with laptop computers
Commendations 2
-
CM1of San Diego County. County Animal Control officers' and staff's participation in the Workforce Academy for Youth program. Partnering with Crime Stoppers in an effort to reduce cruelty to animals in San Diego County. Establishing the "Spirit Medical Fund" which helps animals and saves the County money. Partnering with "Pets for Patriots" to help military veterans adopt shelter pets.
-
CM2The Grand Jury commends the producers of Science Diet for their donation of food to all three centers and to the public who adopts animals. REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS The California Penal Code §933(c) requires any public agency which the Grand Jury has reviewed, and about which it has issued a final report, to comment to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the agency. Such comment shall be made no later than 90 days after the Grand Jury publishes its report (filed with the Clerk of the Court); except that in the case of a report containing findings and recommendations pertaining to a department or agency headed by an elected County official (e.g. District Attorney, Sheriff, etc.), such comment shall be made within 60 days to the Presiding Judge with an information copy sent to the Board of Supervisors. Furthermore, California Penal Code §933.05(a), (b), (c), details, as follows, the manner in which such comment(s) are to be made: (a) As to each grand jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: (1) The respondent agrees with the finding (2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. (b) As to each grand jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions: (1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action. (2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report. (4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. (c) If a finding or recommendation of the grand jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the Board of Supervisors shall respond if requested by the grand jury, but the response of the Board of Supervisors shall address only those budgetary or personnel matters over which it has some decision making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department. Comments to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court in compliance with the Penal Code §933.05 are required from the: Responding Agency
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.