Orange County Grand Jury • 2022-2023 • Agency Response
Response to: Welcome to the Neighborhood - Are cities responsibly managing the integration of group homes?

Santa Ma City of Rancho Santa Margarita*

Published: August 09, 2023 5 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 11 findings

F1
Group homes too close to one another contribute to the problems associated with overconcentration. Response: Disagree. The Grand Jury Report presents anecdotal evidence. There is no factual basis by which to agree with this finding. The City of Rancho Santa Margarita has no specific experience with overconcentration of group homes.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Common nuisances are more likely and disruptive when sober living homes are concentrated in a small geographic area of a neighborhood. Response: Disagree. The Grand Jury report includes a discussion on which cites anecdotal evidence regarding neighborhood frustrations and a graphic serving as the only definition of "common nuisances." There is not enough information provided by which to agree with this finding, and the City of Rancho Santa Margarita has no specific experience with overconcentration of group homes.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Some cities have successfully addressed and informed community members about the challenges faced in regulating group homes. Response: Disagree. Information regarding community education is provided on pages 19-22 of the Grand Jury Report. This section discusses several specific examples of public meetings regarding group homes. While the report indicates that "The outcome can be quite different," we respectfully disagree. In each case, cities were unable to Mayor Mayor Pro Tempore Council Member Council Member Council Member City Manager Jerry Holloway Carol A. Gamble L. Anthony Beall Anne D. Figueroa Bradley J. McGirr Jennifer M. Cervantez Hon. Presiding Judge of the Orange County Superior Court August 9, 2023 regulate group homes in a way that the citizens requested due to State law and court decisions. The Report concludes on that, "when cities work to inform their constituents, and allow for robust but respectful dialogue, they create an opportunity for collaborative problem solving." However, the Grand Jury report does not indicate what the collaborative solution would be, or how it was arrived at or implemented by any of the cities mentioned in the report.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Orange County cities and the County of Orange should pool resources for defense of lawsuits challenging group home ordinances. (F6,
F4
Community satisfaction was minimal when cities took the traditional public comment approach towards addressing community complaints. Response: Disagree. See response to Finding 3.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Cities are not utilizing police, fire, and code enforcement complaints as a means of locating and tracking Group Homes. Response: Disgree. Cities often learn of the location of an unlicensed group home due to calls for service or code enforcement complaints. However, there are many limitations to using police, fire, and code enforcement complaints for tracking purposes. For example, law enforcement calls for service are subject to privacy protection. Further, if group homes are not subject to local ordinances or permitting requirements, and are protected by State policies, tracking is not warranted.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Orange County cities and the County of Orange should modify code enforcement report data collection forms to include a searchable field that enables the identification of a residence operating as a group home. (F5, F7,
F6
Cities are inhibited from enacting and enforcing ordinances due to fears over the potential cost of litigation. Response: Disagree. The information in the Report represents the opinion of the Grand Jury. The Report does not include substantial evidence that any of the cities have indicated that they have actively avoided pursuing the enactment and enforcement of ordinances relating to group homes due to the cost of potential litigation. To the contrary, the City of Rancho Santa Margarita has not attempted to regulate group homes because the State and the courts have preempted municipal regulation.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Several cities have created an ordinance that requires a ministerial permit or registration to operate a group home, however many of these cities do not enforce their ordinances. Response: Disagree. See response to Finding 6.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
City and County officials are deterred from regulating group homes by California Housing and Community Development's housing element approval process. Response: Disagree. The Report indicates that the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has withheld approval of cities' Housing Elements over the issue of group home ordinances. However, the report does not cite any specific cities who have had this experience. The City of Rancho Santa Margarita has obtained a Hon. Presiding Judge of the Orange County Superior Court August 9, 2023 certified Housing Element. Through the review of the City's Housing Element, HCD reviewed local regulations for group homes to ensure that they are consistent with State law. The review found that the Rancho Santa Margarita Zoning Code lacks objective standards for review and approval of group homes for seven or more people. The City included a program in the Housing Element to rectify this deficiency, which was acceptable to HCD and did not result in certification being withheld.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Cities have historically strategized and acted independently in addressing group home challenges and solutions. Response: Disagree partially. The City of Rancho Santa Margarita agrees that cities have acted independently to address group homes. Every city is different and it is best left to cities to address local challenges in ways which are appropriate to the local needs. Further, the League of California Cities, a group comprising membership of the vast majority of California cities, has previously engaged in legislative discussions to further local control to the extent possible.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Well-operated group homes can integrate smoothly into neighborhoods. Response: Disagree partially. The City of Rancho Santa Margarita has no specific experience in this regard. Because City staff is not aware of any problems, and it is likely that group homes exist in the City, it may be the case that well-operated group homes are integrating smoothly into the neighborhoods. However, there is not enough evidence upon which to completely agree with this finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
There is a lack of regulatory oversight for the health and safety of residents of unlicensed group homes. Response: Disagree. There is no factual basis by which to agree with this finding. The City of Rancho Santa Margarita does not have any direct experience with health and safety concerns related to residents of unlicensed group homes.
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.