⚠️ Aviso de traducción:
Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations
1 findings
The VTA Board, currently made up exclusively of elected officials from Santa Clara County, Board of Supervisors, the City of San Jose and the other smaller cities in the County, suffers from: A lack of experience, continuity and leadership; Inadequate time for the directors to devote to their duties to the VTA Board due to their primary focus on the demands of their elected positions; A lack of engagement on the part of some directors, fostered in part by the . committee system, resulting in VTA functioning largely as a staff-driven organization; Domination, in terms of numbers, seniority and influence, by representatives of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors and the City of San Jose; and Frequent tension between the director's (sic) fiduciary duties to VTA and its regional role, on the one hand, and the political demands of their local elected positions, on the other. Response: Partially Agree. While the finding correctly identifies many of the factors influencing effective leadership of the VTA Board, some of the broad generalizations are not applicable to every director. Specifically, some directors do have transportation experience having served on other VTA committees and/or being engaged in local transportation issues. In addition, some directors create the necessary time to prepare for meetings.
Related Recommendations (4)
These reports should be completed and delivered prior to December 31, 2019. Response: Requires further analysis.
As constituent agencies of VTA, each of the cities in the County should prepare and deliver to the VTA and the County Board of Supervisors a written report setting forth its views regarding VTA governance, with specific reference to the elements listed in
following the completion of the studies and reports specified in Recommendations 1a, 1b and 1c, the County of Santa Clara and/or one or more of VTA's other constituent agencies, should propose enabling legislation, including appropriate amendments to Sections 100060 through 100063 of the California Public Utilities Code, to improve the governance structure of VTA (which potentially could include an increase in the directors' term of service, the addition of term limitations and the inclusion of appointed directors who are not currently serving elected officials). Response: Requires further analysis. Assuming that the analysis and engagement of the constituent agencies occurs pursuant to the response to Recommendation 1c, the City of Monte Sereno is open to participating in the development of legislation regarding VTA governance. Any legislation should address the root concerns regarding underrepresentation of the smaller jurisdictions.
In order to provide more continuity in the leadership of the VTA Board, following the completion of the studies and reports specified in Recommendations 1a, 1b and 1c, the County of Santa Clara and/or one or more of VTA's other constituent agencies, should propose enabling legislation amending Section 100061 of the California Public Utilities code (sic) to provide that the Chairperson of the VTA Board shall be elected for a term of two years rather than one. Response: Requires further analysis. It is premature to commit to a specific legislative action pending the outcome of the requested studies and reports. Specifically, while continuity in leadership is typically 2 effective for any governing body, the continuity is only effective if it is fairly distributed among the constituent agencies. Otherwise, a longer term of the Chairperson would exacerbate the issues identified in the Grand Jury Report. 3
No Responses Found
2
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.