Alameda County Grand Jury • 2020-2021

Peralta Community College District Broken Board Governance and Bad Behavior Executive Summary The Peralta Community

Published: June 18, 2021 26 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 18 findings

21-1 Page 1
Interference in the chancellors’ recommended appointments of management employees by Peralta trustees between 2018 and 2020 irreparably damaged the chancellor/board governance relationship.
F21-1
Interference in the chancellors’ recommended appointments of management employees by Peralta trustees between 2018 and 2020 irreparably damaged the chancellor/board governance relationship.
21-2 Page 1
Individual board member interference in the formal hiring process of management employees between 2018 and 2020 by performing informal vetting and challenging the formal recruitment/vetting process and chancellor
F21-2
Individual board member interference in the formal hiring process of management employees between 2018 and 2020 by performing informal vetting and challenging the formal recruitment/vetting process and chancellor recommendations, irreparably harmed the chancellor/board governance relationship.
21-3 Page 1
Holding closed session discussions to reevaluate the formal recruitment/vetting process and chancellor
F21-3
Holding closed session discussions to reevaluate the formal recruitment/vetting process and chancellor recommendations of management employees between 2018 and 2020 compromised the fair and independent hiring process. 35
21-4 Page 1
Peralta Board Policy 7110 which gives the Peralta Board of Trustees the power to approve the appointment of management employees was interpreted by the board between 2018 and 2020 in a manner that conflicts with Board Policy 2430 Delegation of Authority to the Chancellor and the portion of Board Policy 7110 that delegates the authority for human resources to the chancellor. Incivility
F21-4
Peralta Board Policy 7110 which gives the Peralta Board of Trustees the power to approve the appointment of management employees was interpreted by the board between 2018 and 2020 in a manner that conflicts with Board Policy 2430 Delegation of Authority to the Chancellor and the portion of Board Policy 7110 that delegates the authority for human resources to the chancellor. Incivility
21-5 Page 1
Individual board members’ incivility and harsh treatment of other trustees and administrators between 2018 and 2020 damaged staff morale and compromised the authority of the chancellor and other administrators.
F21-5
Individual board members’ incivility and harsh treatment of other trustees and administrators between 2018 and 2020 damaged staff morale and compromised the authority of the chancellor and other administrators.
21-6 Page 1
The 2018-2020 Peralta Board of Trustees failed to recognize that disrespectful and demeaning comments directed at staff were interpreted as racially insensitive which consequently damaged district morale and board/administrator relationships.
F21-6
The 2018-2020 Peralta Board of Trustees failed to recognize that disrespectful and demeaning comments directed at staff were interpreted as racially insensitive which consequently damaged district morale and board/administrator relationships.
21-7 Page 1
Board leadership between 2018-2020 consistently failed to intervene consistent with board policies in situations where board members and staff were treated in an uncivil and harsh manner by other board members and the public. Brown Act
F21-7
Board leadership between 2018-2020 consistently failed to intervene consistent with board policies in situations where board members and staff were treated in an uncivil and harsh manner by other board members and the public. Brown Act
21-8 Page 1
During the late-night hours of July 18, 2020, a majority of the Peralta Board of Trustees secretly met with academic leaders to discuss district business, excluding the public and three trustees who would have disagreed with the purpose of the meeting. The gathering violated the sanctity of participatory governance in California as described in the Brown Act.
F21-8
During the late-night hours of July 18, 2020, a majority of the Peralta Board of Trustees secretly met with academic leaders to discuss district business, excluding the public and three trustees who would have disagreed with the purpose of the meeting. The gathering violated the sanctity of participatory governance in California as described in the Brown Act.
21-9 Page 1
On the morning of July 19, 2020, a majority of the Peralta Academic Senate met secretly to discuss district business with other academic leaders and one Peralta trustee without proper notice and public access. The gathering violated the sanctity of participatory governance in California as described in the Brown Act.
F21-9
On the morning of July 19, 2020, a majority of the Peralta Academic Senate met secretly to discuss district business with other academic leaders and one Peralta trustee without proper notice and public access. The gathering violated the sanctity of participatory governance in California as described in the Brown Act. 36

Recommendations 1

Conclusions 2

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Peralta Community College District School District