Alameda County Grand Jury
• 2020-2021
Peralta Community College District Broken Board Governance and Bad Behavior Executive Summary The Peralta Community
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 18 findings
21-1
Page 1
Interference in the chancellors’ recommended appointments of management employees by Peralta trustees between 2018 and 2020 irreparably damaged the chancellor/board governance relationship.
F21-1
Interference in the chancellors’ recommended appointments of management employees by Peralta trustees between 2018 and 2020 irreparably damaged the chancellor/board governance relationship.
21-2
Page 1
Individual board member interference in the formal hiring process of management employees between 2018 and 2020 by performing informal vetting and challenging the formal recruitment/vetting process and chancellor
F21-2
Individual board member interference in the formal hiring process of management employees between 2018 and 2020 by performing informal vetting and challenging the formal recruitment/vetting process and chancellor recommendations, irreparably harmed the chancellor/board governance relationship.
21-3
Page 1
Holding closed session discussions to reevaluate the formal recruitment/vetting process and chancellor
F21-3
Holding closed session discussions to reevaluate the formal recruitment/vetting process and chancellor recommendations of management employees between 2018 and 2020 compromised the fair and independent hiring process. 35
21-4
Page 1
Peralta Board Policy 7110 which gives the Peralta Board of Trustees the power to approve the appointment of management employees was interpreted by the board between 2018 and 2020 in a manner that conflicts with Board Policy 2430 Delegation of Authority to the Chancellor and the portion of Board Policy 7110 that delegates the authority for human resources to the chancellor. Incivility
F21-4
Peralta Board Policy 7110 which gives the Peralta Board of Trustees the power to approve the appointment of management employees was interpreted by the board between 2018 and 2020 in a manner that conflicts with Board Policy 2430 Delegation of Authority to the Chancellor and the portion of Board Policy 7110 that delegates the authority for human resources to the chancellor. Incivility
21-5
Page 1
Individual board members’ incivility and harsh treatment of other trustees and administrators between 2018 and 2020 damaged staff morale and compromised the authority of the chancellor and other administrators.
F21-5
Individual board members’ incivility and harsh treatment of other trustees and administrators between 2018 and 2020 damaged staff morale and compromised the authority of the chancellor and other administrators.
21-6
Page 1
The 2018-2020 Peralta Board of Trustees failed to recognize that disrespectful and demeaning comments directed at staff were interpreted as racially insensitive which consequently damaged district morale and board/administrator relationships.
F21-6
The 2018-2020 Peralta Board of Trustees failed to recognize that disrespectful and demeaning comments directed at staff were interpreted as racially insensitive which consequently damaged district morale and board/administrator relationships.
21-7
Page 1
Board leadership between 2018-2020 consistently failed to intervene consistent with board policies in situations where board members and staff were treated in an uncivil and harsh manner by other board members and the public. Brown Act
F21-7
Board leadership between 2018-2020 consistently failed to intervene consistent with board policies in situations where board members and staff were treated in an uncivil and harsh manner by other board members and the public. Brown Act
21-8
Page 1
During the late-night hours of July 18, 2020, a majority of the Peralta Board of Trustees secretly met with academic leaders to discuss district business, excluding the public and three trustees who would have disagreed with the purpose of the meeting. The gathering violated the sanctity of participatory governance in California as described in the Brown Act.
F21-8
During the late-night hours of July 18, 2020, a majority of the Peralta Board of Trustees secretly met with academic leaders to discuss district business, excluding the public and three trustees who would have disagreed with the purpose of the meeting. The gathering violated the sanctity of participatory governance in California as described in the Brown Act.
21-9
Page 1
On the morning of July 19, 2020, a majority of the Peralta Academic Senate met secretly to discuss district business with other academic leaders and one Peralta trustee without proper notice and public access. The gathering violated the sanctity of participatory governance in California as described in the Brown Act.
F21-9
On the morning of July 19, 2020, a majority of the Peralta Academic Senate met secretly to discuss district business with other academic leaders and one Peralta trustee without proper notice and public access. The gathering violated the sanctity of participatory governance in California as described in the Brown Act. 36
Recommendations 1
-
21-9Page 1The Peralta Board of Trustees must discuss the
Conclusions 2
-
CL1 Page 22Effective educational institutions that foster learning and achievement most often excel by delivering programs and services laser-focused on students. Per the ACCJC, ethical and effective leadership throughout an organization is an essential component that helps lead to such success. Over the better part of the last decade, Peralta’s Board of Trustees have lost sight of this with board members’ infighting and some treating executive leadership as the enemy while battling for control amongst themselves. While state educational authorities warned the institution was in threat of financial insolvency and its colleges were dangerously close to losing accreditation, the Peralta Board of Trustees failed to use a team approach to solve the problems it faced. In 2019, the board brought in a new chancellor who began to address many of the state’s financial concerns, yet individual trustees’ insistence on controlling the traditional roles delegated to the chancellor contributed to her resignation in less than nine months. The chancellor’s letter of resignation highlighted unhealthy board governance that had lasted for years. Controlling administrative hires, encouraging a culture of infighting, and disrespectful exchanges at meetings were common occurrences and confirmed by the grand jury. Black administrators felt as though the attacks were racially motivated. Claims of backroom dealing and secret meetings displayed abandonment of good governance and sound ethical standards. Renewed calls by state educational authorities to address governance required action. The grand jury acknowledges and commends the Peralta Board of Trustees for adopting a board Statement of Cooperation that was the culmination of a longer process of self-evaluation in 2020. It is also commendable that the board brought in FCMAT and consultants to develop 34
-
CL2 Page 23plans to address many of FCMAT’s recommendations for change. The board also moved quickly to fill the chancellor’s position after a series of resignations, yet there is significant concern by many that some key reforms may be abandoned. Problems related to long-term declining enrollment and fiscal instability demand leadership, vision, and collaboration between trustees and administrators. As one statewide educational expert warned, the Peralta board will continue to get in trouble, make small efforts to improve, then go back to their old ways. Within months of the adoption of the statement of cooperation, another chancellor, who was serving in an interim capacity, resigned and the grand jury found that some of the key ongoing board governance concerns have not been resolved. Cohesion, civility, trust, and mutual respect are critical elements of an effective governing board. Tension, poor communication, lack of unified goals, and divisive individual behavior at Peralta have resulted in the board's inability to fulfill its mandate effectively. Interference in the traditional roles of the chancellor, secret meetings, and backroom dealing destroy staff morale and the board’s relationship with the administrative team. Without reform or change in board behavior, Peralta’s students, so in need of this essential institution, will continue to suffer.
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Peralta Community College District
School District