Orange County Grand Jury • 2002-2003 • Agency Response

Ircuits Are Usy at the

Published: November 05, 2002 10 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 5 findings

F1
Thirty phone calls were made to the ROV by eight Grand Jurors. Only seven calls were completed.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
A majority of poll workers questioned were unaware of the Direct Record Electronic (DRE) voting system demonstrations conducted by the ROV.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
A majority of phone calls made by the interviewed poll workers to the ROV received the circuits are busy message, and when messages were left at ROV, some calls were not returned.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Some polling places at schools lacked designated voter and handicapped parking. Some lacked access for the handicapped from the parking area to the polling place.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Signs provided by ROV for the entrances to school and church polling places were not readable from the street. Responses to Findings 1-5 are required from the Board of Supervisors. Responses to Findings 1-5 are requested from the Registrar of Voters. Responses to Findings 1 and 3 are requested from the County Executive Office, Office of Information Technology.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
I have lost my sample ballot book. Can you tell me where am I supposed to go to vote?

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.