2 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Dispatch Consolidation would result in more cost effective emergency response and should be implemented throughout Santa Clara County. The City agrees with Finding 1.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
: It is extremely costly to equip a fire department for only the occasional fire response; the County and fifteen towns/cities have not been proactive in challenging fire departments to adopt changes that are more cost effective and that better serve their communities. Further, unions are more interested in job preservation than in providing the right mix of capabilities at a reasonable cost, using scare tactics to influence the public and fostering firefighter unwillingness to collaborate with EMS. <u>Response</u> The City of Palo Alto agrees and disagrees with this finding. The City recogniz...
R2
Jurisdictions which maintain their own dispatching centers should continue to work with the Silicon Valley Regional Interoperability Authority to achieve countywide standardization of radio technology. The City agrees with Recommendation 2. Police and Fire agencies in Santa Clara County operate on three disparate radio bands, VHF, UHF and 800 MHz. SVRIA is a countywide JPA that seeks to address the problem of voice and data interoperability. SVRIA plans to build a countywide 700 MHz radio system...
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
: All cities that manage their own fire department-Gilroy, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale-and the County (for CCFD and SCFD) and that also have contractual minimum staffing requirements should reopen negotiations with the unions to eliminate this term and any other term that limits a fire chief's ability to "right-size" staffing given the time of day or time of year. <u>Response</u> The City of Palo Alto agrees with this recommendation and has already proposed elimination of staffing minimums. The City of Palo Alto is currently at impasse in labor negotiat...