📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Yolo County Grand Jury • 2013-2014

Implementing Major Changes in Education at the Local Level:

Published: June 30, 2014 62 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 14 findings

F1 Page 26
Because the regulations and templates pertaining to LCFF and LCAP are still being developed by the State of California, it is too early to determine if YCOE and the five school districts will successfully implement the new K-12 financial reforms.
F2 Page 26
The five school districts and YCOE are on schedule with implementing the Common Core State Standards.
F3 Page 34
The Coroners’ Division has developed a successful intern program that assists the Division in meeting its staffing needs while providing an excellent learning opportunity for interns.
F4 Page 34
The Agreement for Provision of Forensic Pathology Services No. 13-115, recently approved by the Board of Supervisors, does not set forth clear compliance measures that can be used to monitor the FMG sole source contract as required by Yolo County Contracting and Purchasing Policies. For example, the requirements that autopsies be performed “as soon as possible” and that forensic pathology services be performed “in a manner satisfactory to the Sheriff or his designee” are too vague to be enforceable.
F5 Page 34
Recently the performance of FMG has been inconsistent in the timely completion of autopsies and autopsy reports. There is an unacceptable backlog in autopsy reports from FMG. 33 2013 - 2014 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT: INVESTIGATIONS 2013 - 2014 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT Yolo County Coroner’s Division
F6 Page 35
In some instances, the Coroner’s Division has authorized payment to FMG for autopsy services which, according to the contract, include both autopsy and report, before the autopsy report has been received.
F7 Page 35
Yolo County does not require as part of its contract with FMG, nor does it independently verify, the medical licensing or board certification of FMG physicians who perform autopsies in Yolo County.
F8 Page 72
The Sheriff failed to observe County Code Section 2-6.44 Nepotism Policy by hiring immediate family members and determining their salaries, promotions, assignments, performance evaluations and discipline. 71 2013 - 2014 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT: INVESTIGATIONS 2013 - 2014 YOLO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT Yolo County Sheriff: Leadership Practices from the Wild, Wild West
F9 Page 73
The Sheriff was unaware of the contents and intent of the State of California Public Service Ethics AB 1234.
F10 Page 73
The Grand Jury was unable to determine the County’s compliance with the State of California Public Service Ethics AB 1234 mandated training for 2006-2011 for the Sheriff.
F11 Page 73
HR manages harassment and ethics online training courses for all employees to comply with state and federal laws. These outdated and repetitious trainings are found to be inadequate and ineffective.
F12 Page 73
The HR Department serves in an advisory role and lacks appropriate oversight and accountability of personnel matters at the Sheriff’s Department.
F13 Page 73
The CAO and HR have insufficiently monitored and audited the Sheriff’s Department compliance with County Codes and Policies and Procedures.
F14 Page 73
The CAO conducts a 360 degree evaluation for all appointed Department Heads. This evaluation process currently excludes elected officials.

Recommendations 9

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Yolo County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office