⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F1
The 2018-2019 Mendocino County Civil Grand Jury issued 24 recommendations requiring responses from 4 different County agencies or governing boards.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Future Mendocino County Civil Grand Juries continue to issue annual continuity reports. RESPONSES No responses are required or requested. This is a public report on the procedures of the GJ in the interest of transparency. The GJ procedures manual is being reviewed and revised. This will enable subsequent grand juries to hold responding parties accountable for the minimum legal requirements of California Penal Code §933 and §933.05. Pg. 9 -2020
F2
Mendocino County Civil Grand Juries have not issued continuity reports in the past 10 years.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Accountability for respondents to meet the requirements of California Penal Code §933 and §933.05 has not been tracked by the Mendocino County Civil Grand Juries.
No recommendations for this finding
Comments 1
-
CO1Recommendation #3: Post a link to the school, district and state SARC and API scores on the school website. Respondent Response Ukiah District Superintendent requested Has been implemented. Willits District Superintendent requested Has been implemented but did not specify documents posted. Anderson Valley District requested No response received. Superintendent Fort Bragg District requested Has been implemented. Superintendent Point Arena District requested No response received. Superintendent Response Analysis No further analysis required. Pg. 6 Mendocino County Civil Grand Jury 2019-2020 Recommendation #4: Build a space on the MCOE website for teachers at any school in Mendocino County to publish tips and suggestions to improve the classroom experience, e.g., behavior and teaching methodologies. Respondent Response Mendocino County required Has not yet been implemented but will explore Superintendent of Education feasibility. Ukiah District Superintendent requested Will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable. Willits District Superintendent requested Will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable. Anderson Valley District requested No response received. Superintendent Fort Bragg District requested Will not be implemented because it is not Superintendent warranted or is not reasonable. Point Arena District requested No response received. Superintendent Response Analysis MCOE provided links to State of California websites for teachers and students but no local link or timeframe for implementation was provided. UKIAH VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT: Change and Transparency Needed June 19, 2019 Recommendation #1: The City and District work together to find a way to manage the overall sewer system as a single entity equitably and efficiently for all ratepayers. Respondent Response City of Ukiah required Agrees. Ukiah Valley Sanitation District required Has been implemented. Response Analysis The responses from the City and the District are contradictory. The City references their recently proposed JPA and the UVSD references the Operating Agreement of October 2018. Recommendation #2: The District enter into negotiations with the City regarding the proposed MOU/JPA. Respondent Response Ukiah Valley Sanitation District required Will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable. Response Analysis No further analysis required. Pg. 7 Mendocino County Civil Grand Jury 2019-2020 Recommendation #3: The District provide specific details to ratepayers for its claims that it can save over $1.5 million per year by assuming billing, maintenance and sewage treatment responsibilities with a detailed feasibility and cost analysis. Respondent Response Ukiah Valley Sanitation District required Will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable. Response Analysis No further analysis required. Recommendation #4: The District Board must act in accordance with the Brown Act which promotes transparency and public participation. Respondent Response Ukiah Valley Sanitation District required No action required. Response Analysis No further analysis required. MEASURE B: Mental Health Treatment Act…Where Are We? June 19, 2019 Recommendation #1: The Committee form two ad hoc committees, one focusing on site location and construction and the other on operations and treatment. Respondent Response Mendocino County Board of required Will not be implemented because it is not Supervisors warranted or is not reasonable. Response Analysis Not within BOS purview. Recommendation #2: The Committee can address policies, procedures and job descriptions during construction. Respondent Response Mendocino County Board of required Will not be implemented because it is not Supervisors warranted or is not reasonable. Response Analysis Not within BOS purview. Pg. 8 Mendocino County Civil Grand Jury 2019-2020 Recommendation #3: The BOS prepare and publicize a plan with goals and timelines for the completion of the CSU, CRT and PHF, e.g., Mendocino County website and local news media. Respondent Response Mendocino County Board of required Has not yet been implemented but will be Supervisors implemented in the future. Response Analysis Implementation dates and/or timeframe not stated. Recommendation #4: The BOS priority should be planning and construction of the three facilities. Respondent Response Mendocino County Board of required Has not yet been implemented but will be Supervisors implemented in the future. Response Analysis Implementation dates and/or timeframe not stated.
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Mendocino County
County