Orange County Grand Jury
• 2011-2012
• Agency Response
Response to:
Serrano Water District
Serrano Water District 18021 East Lincoln Street*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F2
Page 1
"Content and clarity for the OC cities elected officials and executives over $100,000 in base salary is improving in this 2nd year of ratings. On the other hand, there is understandably more potential improvement possible for the Special Districts and join power authority, which are in their first year of ratings." Response to
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 1
"The Grand Jury recommends that each of the forty-one of the fifty-seven Orange County cities, districts and joint power authority that were rated less than excellent for their Content and Clarity for their Executive and Elected Officials compensation costs page upgrade their Executive Compensation page." Response to
F3
Page 1
"There is the most opportunity for more transparent reporting in the Content and Clarity of Employee Compensation Cost reporting on local government websites." Response to
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 1
"The Grand Jury recommends that the County of Orange and all Orange County cities, districts and joint power authority that were rated less than Excellent for Content and Clarity for their Employee Compensation Costs Page upgrade their Employee Pages." Response to
F4
Page 1
"Many Orange County local government web sites do not generally post their employer pension annual contribution rates prominently to their web sites as part of their compensation cost disclosure for public disclosure." Response to
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Page 1
"The Grand Jury recommends that all Orange County cities, districts and joint power authority, as well as the County of Orange, post their employer pension annual contribution rates prominently and transparently on their web sites. Current and recent rates would be instructive and informative. It is recognized that some already do." Response to
F5
Page 1
The Orange County "de facto" standard for CCT in the county, cities, districts and JPA now contains all employees, including a page for executives and elected officials. Two key categories are missing from compensation cost reporting. They are overtime pay and on-call pay. They have become important as the new "de facto" compensation cost reporting standard which now includes all employees." Response to
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Page 1
"The Grand Jury recommends that all Orange County cities, districts and joint power authority, as well as the County of Orange, include overtime pay and on-call pay in compensation cost reporting on their employees' compensation pages." Response to
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.