Score: -9
(4/27/13)
Orange County Grand Jury
• 2021-2022
Grand Jury 2021-2022 Where Have All the CRVs Gone?
Published: June 28, 2022
20 pages
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
Due to the reduced availability of convenient CRV redemption sites and the lack of accurate online information, it is difficult for resident consumers to redeem CRV fees.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their jurisdiction. (F1, F3)
F2
Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
When renegotiating their current waste hauler contract, all cities and the County of Orange should assess the value of the CRV funds received by the waste hauler in their jurisdiction and creatively leverage this revenue for the benefit of their residents. (F2, F4)
F3
CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle.
Related Recommendations (3)
R1
By January of 2023, each of the cities in Orange County should research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for their community that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
R2
By January of 2023, the Orange County Board of Supervisors should require OC Waste & Recycling to research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for the unincorporated areas of OC that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
R4
By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their jurisdiction. (F1, F3)
F4
Orange County and most OC Cities do not make CRV redemption and recycling a priority when negotiating their waste hauler contracts which results in missed financial opportunities and convenience for their residents. In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2021-2022 Grand Jury requires responses from each agency affected by the findings presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
When renegotiating their current waste hauler contract, all cities and the County of Orange should assess the value of the CRV funds received by the waste hauler in their jurisdiction and creatively leverage this revenue for the benefit of their residents. (F2, F4)
Commendations 1
-
CM1The OCGJ commends Recycle From Home in the City of Irvine as CalRecycle’s only pilot project grant program in Orange County. A collaboration between the City and private enterprise, Recycle From Home is a unique collaborative concept to service the entire City of Irvine’s CRV recycling needs. This is an eco-friendly way to recycle right from your driveway or doorstep. This mobile residential recycling service was selected and approved as part of a new pilot project grant program established by the State of California. The pilot program is innovative, convenient, helps keep CRV recyclable material out of the waste stream and returns the deposits directly to the consumer. RESPONSES The following excerpts from the California Penal Code provide the requirements for public agencies to respond to the Findings and Recommendations of this Grand Jury report: California Penal Code Section 933 requires the governing body of any public agency which the Grand Jury has reviewed, and about which it has issued a final report, to comment to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body. Such comment shall be made no later than 90 days after the Grand Jury publishes its report (filed with the Clerk of the Court). Additionally, in the case of a report containing findings and recommendations pertaining to a department or agency headed by an elected County official (e.g., District Attorney, Sheriff, etc.), such elected County official shall comment on the findings and recommendations pertaining to the matters under that elected official’s control within 60 days to the Presiding Judge with an information copy sent to the Board of Supervisors. Furthermore, California Penal Code Section 933.05 specifies the way such comment(s) are to be made as follows: (a) As to each Grand Jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: 2021-2022 Orange County Grand Jury Page 15 Where Have All the CRVs Gone? (1) The respondent agrees with the finding. (2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding; in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. (b) As to each Grand Jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions: (1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action. (2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the Grand Jury report. (4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. (c) If a finding or recommendation of the Grand Jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the Board of Supervisors shall respond if requested by the Grand Jury, but the response of the Board of Supervisors shall address only those budgetary /or personnel matters over which it has some decision-making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department.
Agency Responses 11
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
▶
City of Laguna Niguel 10/04/22
June 28, 2022
•
2 pages
View Details ▾
No structured response data extracted yet.
View the PDF for full details.
▶
City of Los Alamitos 09/20/22
September 20, 2022
•
3 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 3, 0)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Due to the reduced availability of convenient CRV redemption sites and the lack of accurate online information, it is difficult for resident consumers to redeem CRV fees.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Disagree There are currently three CRV redemption sites within a three-mile radius of Los Alamitos City Hall, all of which have an online presence. As such, the City does not concur with the Grand Jury's finding. F2. Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. Response: Disagree As residents of Los Alamitos have access to and/or are in close proximity to multiple CRV redemption sites, there are no barriers to their ability to obtain CRV redemption should they choose to. F3. CalRecycle is...
F2
Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Disagree As residents of Los Alamitos have access to and/or are in close proximity to multiple CRV redemption sites, there are no barriers to their ability to obtain CRV redemption should they choose to. F3. CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange
City of Los Alamitos Page 2 of 3 County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle. Response: Partially Agree While the CRV redemption program has worked well in the p...
F3
CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Partially Agree While the CRV redemption program has worked well in the past, smaller cities that contract out their waste hauling services are often unable to meet specific requirements in order to take advantage of specific funding programs. In the event cities are able to access this funding, it is for a short period of time. As such, cities are required to continuously apply for new grant funding in order to sustain programs initiated by the State. Recommendations and Responses: R1. By January of 2023, each of the cities in Orange County should research and apply for available grants or pi...
▶
City of San Clemente 12/13/22
December 13, 2022
•
3 pages
• 7 responses
•
Score: 0
(+1, 4, -1)
View Details ▾
7 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Due to the reduced availability of convenient CRV redemption sites and the lack of accurate online information, it is difficult for resident consumers to redeem CRV fees.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Based on the information presented in this report, the City of San Clemente generally agrees with this finding. However, with regard to online information, the City of San Clemente's website includes an environmental programs webpage with information about recycling, including the location of a CRV Redemption Center (Ponce Recycling) in the City of San Clemente. F2: Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. Response: Based on the information presented in this report, the City of San Cl...
R1
By January of 2023, each of the cities in Orange County should research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for their community that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
The recommendation has been implemented; the City of San Clemente evaluates and applies for grants that benefit customers and residents. Annually, the City applies for City/County Beverage Grant Payment Program. R2: By January of 2023, the Orange County Board of Supervisors should require OC Waste and Recycling to research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for the unincorporated areas of OC that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. Response: The City of San Clemente will not implement this recommendation because both OC Waste and Recycling and un...
F2
Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Based on the information presented in this report, the City of San Clemente generally agrees that waste haulers are likely collecting more CRV materials and potentially collecting additional revenue compared to when there were more redemption centers. F3: CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not
City of San Clemente Page 2 fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle. Response: Based on the information prese...
R2
By January of 2023, the Orange County Board of Supervisors should require OC Waste & Recycling to research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for the unincorporated areas of OC that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The City of San Clemente will not implement this recommendation because both OC Waste and Recycling and unincorporated Orange County areas are not within the City's jurisdiction, control or authority. R3: When renegotiating their current waste hauler contract, all cities and the County of Orange should assess the value of the CRV funds received by the waste hauler in their jurisdiction and creatively leverage this revenue for the benefit of their residents. Response: The City of San Clemente has not yet implemented the recommendation, but it will be implemented in the future. The City is in th...
F3
CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Based on the information presented in this report, the City of San Clemente partially agrees with this finding. The City of San Clemente applies for grant funding through CalRecycle when available and cost effective, such as, the Beverage Container Recycling City/County Payment Program. Recommendations: R1: By January of 2023, each of the cities in Orange County should research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for their community that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. Response: The recommendation has been implemented; the City of San Clemente...
R3
When renegotiating their current waste hauler contract, all cities and the County of Orange should assess the value of the CRV funds received by the waste hauler in their jurisdiction and creatively leverage this revenue for the benefit of their residents. (F2, F4)
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
The City of San Clemente has not yet implemented the recommendation, but it will be implemented in the future. The City is in the process of negotiating its Solid Waste and Recycling Agreement and will evaluate CRV with its waste hauler to explore potential benefits to residents and customers. R4; By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their jurisdiction. Response: The City of San Clemente has implemented this recommendation through its website, whichhich in...
R4
By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their jurisdiction. (F1, F3)
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of San Clemente has implemented this recommendation through its website, whichhich includes information on CRV and recycling centers with a link to CalRecycle.
▶
City of San Juan Capistrano 09/26/22
September 26, 2022
•
3 pages
• 6 responses
•
Score: -4
(+0, 2, -4)
View Details ▾
6 responses to findings and recommendations
R1
By January of 2023, each of the cities in Orange County should research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for their community that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano agrees with this finding. The City of San Juan Capistrano has made efforts to inform CalRecycle of improvements that could be made to online resources, including providing accurate information as to the location of CRV redemption sites within San Juan Capistrano. F 2: Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. City Response: Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano ag...
F2
Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano agrees with this finding. The City of San Juan Capistrano has made efforts to inform CalRecycle of improvements that could be made to online resources, including providing accurate information as to the location of CRV redemption sites within San Juan Capistrano. F 2: Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. City Response: Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano ag...
R2
By January of 2023, the Orange County Board of Supervisors should require OC Waste & Recycling to research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for the unincorporated areas of OC that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano agrees with this finding. The City of San Juan Capistrano has made efforts to inform CalRecycle of improvements that could be made to online resources, including providing accurate information as to the location of CRV redemption sites within San Juan Capistrano. F 2: Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. City Response: Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano ag...
F3
CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano agrees with this finding. The City of San Juan Capistrano has made efforts to inform CalRecycle of improvements that could be made to online resources, including providing accurate information as to the location of CRV redemption sites within San Juan Capistrano. F 2: Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. City Response: Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano ag...
R3
When renegotiating their current waste hauler contract, all cities and the County of Orange should assess the value of the CRV funds received by the waste hauler in their jurisdiction and creatively leverage this revenue for the benefit of their residents. (F2, F4)
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano agrees with this finding. The City of San Juan Capistrano has made efforts to inform CalRecycle of improvements that could be made to online resources, including providing accurate information as to the location of CRV redemption sites within San Juan Capistrano. F 2: Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. City Response: Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano ag...
R4
By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their jurisdiction. (F1, F3)
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano agrees with this finding. The City of San Juan Capistrano has made efforts to inform CalRecycle of improvements that could be made to online resources, including providing accurate information as to the location of CRV redemption sites within San Juan Capistrano. F 2: Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. City Response: Based on the information provided in the report, the City of San Juan Capistrano ag...
▶
City of San Juan Capistrano-Progress Response 03/29/23
March 29, 2023
•
2 pages
• 4 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 2, 0)
View Details ▾
4 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Due to the reduced availability of convenient CRV redemption sites and the lack of accurate online information, it is difficult for resident consumers to redeem CRV fees.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
This recommendation will continue to require further analysis as to the potential efficacy of additional community outreach programs to increase CRV redemption participation. The City continues to provide up-to-date information on the City's website for residents to explore multiple recycling options and locations. City staff also provide resources and information upon request.
Hon. Erick Larsh Page 2 of 2 March 29, 2023 Thank you for the opportunity to respond. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Tom Toman, Director of Public Works, at (949) 234-4580. Sincerely, Benjamin S...
R1
By January of 2023, each of the cities in Orange County should research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for their community that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
The City has received funding from the CalRecycle Beverage Container Recycling City/County Payment Program. These funds have been used to purchase water bottle filling stations for the Community Center, Gymnasium, and two park facilities. This option has multiple benefits that help reduce single use bottles, saves money for residents, is an environmentally friendly option, and encourages healthy habits. The City continues to research available CalRecycle CRV grant opportunities and approaches taken by other public agencies. The City has also reached out to Recycle from Home to explore alternat...
F3
CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City has received funding from the CalRecycle Beverage Container Recycling City/County Payment Program. These funds have been used to purchase water bottle filling stations for the Community Center, Gymnasium, and two park facilities. This option has multiple benefits that help reduce single use bottles, saves money for residents, is an environmentally friendly option, and encourages healthy habits. The City continues to research available CalRecycle CRV grant opportunities and approaches taken by other public agencies. The City has also reached out to Recycle from Home to explore alternat...
R4
By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their jurisdiction. (F1, F3)
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
The City has received funding from the CalRecycle Beverage Container Recycling City/County Payment Program. These funds have been used to purchase water bottle filling stations for the Community Center, Gymnasium, and two park facilities. This option has multiple benefits that help reduce single use bottles, saves money for residents, is an environmentally friendly option, and encourages healthy habits. The City continues to research available CalRecycle CRV grant opportunities and approaches taken by other public agencies. The City has also reached out to Recycle from Home to explore alternat...
▶
City of Santa Ana 09/22/22
September 22, 2022
•
24 pages
• 8 responses
•
Score: -8
(+0, 0, -8)
View Details ▾
8 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Due to the reduced availability of convenient CRV redemption sites and the lack of accurate online information, it is difficult for resident consumers to redeem CRV fees.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
Disagree wholly - According to CalRecycle's records, Santa Ana has 22 buyback centers. These 22 buyback centers represent 20% of the 110 total buyback centers in Orange County while Santa Ana's population comprises less than 10% of the County's population. These buyback centers serve a population of 310,227, an average approximate density of one redemption center for every 14,100 people, which is 84% higher density than the California average of one redemption center for every 26,000 people. The City of Santa Ana's redemption center density is also over two times higher than the Orange County ...
R1
By January of 2023, each of the cities in Orange County should research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for their community that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
Response: Will Not Implement
Scheduled: within 60 days
Score: -1
Disagree wholly - According to CalRecycle's records, Santa Ana has 22 buyback centers. These 22 buyback centers represent 20% of the 110 total buyback centers in Orange County while Santa Ana's population comprises less than 10% of the County's population. These buyback centers serve a population of 310,227, an average approximate density of one redemption center for every 14,100 people, which is 84% higher density than the California average of one redemption center for every 26,000 people. The City of Santa Ana's redemption center density is also over two times higher than the Orange County ...
F2
Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
Disagree wholly - According to CalRecycle's records, Santa Ana has 22 buyback centers. These 22 buyback centers represent 20% of the 110 total buyback centers in Orange County while Santa Ana's population comprises less than 10% of the County's population. These buyback centers serve a population of 310,227, an average approximate density of one redemption center for every 14,100 people, which is 84% higher density than the California average of one redemption center for every 26,000 people. The City of Santa Ana's redemption center density is also over two times higher than the Orange County ...
R2
By January of 2023, the Orange County Board of Supervisors should require OC Waste & Recycling to research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for the unincorporated areas of OC that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
Response: Will Not Implement
Scheduled: within 60 days
Score: -1
Disagree wholly - According to CalRecycle's records, Santa Ana has 22 buyback centers. These 22 buyback centers represent 20% of the 110 total buyback centers in Orange County while Santa Ana's population comprises less than 10% of the County's population. These buyback centers serve a population of 310,227, an average approximate density of one redemption center for every 14,100 people, which is 84% higher density than the California average of one redemption center for every 26,000 people. The City of Santa Ana's redemption center density is also over two times higher than the Orange County ...
F3
CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
Disagree wholly - According to CalRecycle's records, Santa Ana has 22 buyback centers. These 22 buyback centers represent 20% of the 110 total buyback centers in Orange County while Santa Ana's population comprises less than 10% of the County's population. These buyback centers serve a population of 310,227, an average approximate density of one redemption center for every 14,100 people, which is 84% higher density than the California average of one redemption center for every 26,000 people. The City of Santa Ana's redemption center density is also over two times higher than the Orange County ...
R3
When renegotiating their current waste hauler contract, all cities and the County of Orange should assess the value of the CRV funds received by the waste hauler in their jurisdiction and creatively leverage this revenue for the benefit of their residents. (F2, F4)
Response: Will Not Implement
Scheduled: within 60 days
Score: -1
Disagree wholly - According to CalRecycle's records, Santa Ana has 22 buyback centers. These 22 buyback centers represent 20% of the 110 total buyback centers in Orange County while Santa Ana's population comprises less than 10% of the County's population. These buyback centers serve a population of 310,227, an average approximate density of one redemption center for every 14,100 people, which is 84% higher density than the California average of one redemption center for every 26,000 people. The City of Santa Ana's redemption center density is also over two times higher than the Orange County ...
F4
Orange County and most OC Cities do not make CRV redemption and recycling a priority when negotiating their waste hauler contracts which results in missed financial opportunities and convenience for their residents. In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2021-2022 Grand Jury requires responses from each agency affected by the findings presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
Disagree wholly - According to CalRecycle's records, Santa Ana has 22 buyback centers. These 22 buyback centers represent 20% of the 110 total buyback centers in Orange County while Santa Ana's population comprises less than 10% of the County's population. These buyback centers serve a population of 310,227, an average approximate density of one redemption center for every 14,100 people, which is 84% higher density than the California average of one redemption center for every 26,000 people. The City of Santa Ana's redemption center density is also over two times higher than the Orange County ...
R4
By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their jurisdiction. (F1, F3)
Response: Will Not Implement
Scheduled: within 60 days
Score: -1
Disagree wholly - According to CalRecycle's records, Santa Ana has 22 buyback centers. These 22 buyback centers represent 20% of the 110 total buyback centers in Orange County while Santa Ana's population comprises less than 10% of the County's population. These buyback centers serve a population of 310,227, an average approximate density of one redemption center for every 14,100 people, which is 84% higher density than the California average of one redemption center for every 26,000 people. The City of Santa Ana's redemption center density is also over two times higher than the Orange County ...
▶
City of Stanton 09/13/22
September 13, 2022
•
3 pages
View Details ▾
No structured response data extracted yet.
View the PDF for full details.
▶
City of Tustin 09/21/22
September 21, 2022
•
2 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 3, 0)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Due to the reduced availability of convenient CRV redemption sites and the lack of accurate online information, it is difficult for resident consumers to redeem CRV fees.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Based on the experience of City staff, the City of Tustin disagrees with this finding. The City of Tustin has received less than five (5) inquiries from residents since January 2018 regarding the location of CRV redemption centers in Tustin. There continues to be one permitted redemption facility in Tustin, Evolution Recycling #5 located at 1022-1112 Walnut Avenue. CalRecycle's website also lists 12 in-store redemption locations in Tustin. Staff has received no resident feedback that the grocery stores do not accept CRV containers. F2: Because redemption site locations have diminished in numbe...
F2
Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Based on the experience of City staff, the City of Tustin disagrees with this finding. The City has not been advised by any residents that the closure of local redemption sites has impacted their ability to obtain CRV. F3: CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle. Response: The City of Tustin partially agrees with this finding. For many years, the CRV redemption pr...
F3
CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City of Tustin partially agrees with this finding. For many years, the CRV redemption program worked well. It is unfortunate CalRecycle could not find a way to modify its program to ensure continued success. Instead, municipalities are expected to sustain a State program through grant funding. Mayor Austin Lumbard
• Mayor Pro Tem Barry W. Cooper
• Letitia Clark
• Ryan Gallagher
• Rebecca "Beckie" Gomez 300 Centennial Way • Tustin, California 92780 • www.tustinca.org
The Honorable Erick L. Larsh September 21, 2022 Page 2 Recommendations: R1: By January of 2023, each of the cities in Orange...
▶
City of Lake Forest 09/21/22
September 21, 2022
•
3 pages
• 6 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 6, 0)
View Details ▾
6 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Due to the reduced availability of convenient CRV redemption sites and the lack of accurate online information, it is difficult for resident consumers to redeem CRV fees.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. There are fewer CRV redemption centers, however there are sites within or nearby for residents to redeem CRVs. In addition, the City maintains a list of CRV redemption opportunities on its website that are verified periodically. F2. Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. Response: The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. Waste haulers are beneficiaries of CRV fees because resident consumers are choo...
R1
By January of 2023, each of the cities in Orange County should research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for their community that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. There are fewer CRV redemption centers, however there are sites within or nearby for residents to redeem CRVs. In addition, the City maintains a list of CRV redemption opportunities on its website that are verified periodically. F2. Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. Response: The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. Waste haulers are beneficiaries of CRV fees because resident consumers are choo...
F2
Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. Waste haulers are beneficiaries of CRV fees because resident consumers are choosing to utilize their curbside carts to recycle beverage containers. F3. CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle. Response: The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. The City utilizes the Beverage Contai...
F3
CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. The City utilizes the Beverage Container Recycling City/County Payment to encourage residents porans www.lakeforestca.gov : . , . - 100 Civic Center Drive Lake Forest, Remember the Past ~ Challenge the Future Lake Forest, CA 92630 B) Prine on Reeyte Pape. (949) 461-3400 Fax: (949) 461-3511
The Honorable Erick L. Larsh - Response to OC Grand Jury Report September 21, 2022 Page 2 of 3 and visitors to recycle beverage containers. Additionally, the City reviews CalRecycle grant opportunities for feasibility and the City's eligibility....
F4
Orange County and most OC Cities do not make CRV redemption and recycling a priority when negotiating their waste hauler contracts which results in missed financial opportunities and convenience for their residents. In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2021-2022 Grand Jury requires responses from each agency affected by the findings presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. There are fewer CRV redemption centers, however there are sites within or nearby for residents to redeem CRVs. In addition, the City maintains a list of CRV redemption opportunities on its website that are verified periodically. F2. Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. Response: The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. Waste haulers are beneficiaries of CRV fees because resident consumers are choo...
R4
By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their jurisdiction. (F1, F3)
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. There are fewer CRV redemption centers, however there are sites within or nearby for residents to redeem CRVs. In addition, the City maintains a list of CRV redemption opportunities on its website that are verified periodically. F2. Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. Response: The City of Lake Forest disagrees partially with this finding. Waste haulers are beneficiaries of CRV fees because resident consumers are choo...
▶
City of Laguna Woods 09/19/22
September 19, 2022
•
4 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 3, 0)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Due to the reduced availability of convenient CRV redemption sites and the lack of accurate online information, it is difficult for resident consumers to redeem CRV fees.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City agrees with this finding. The closure of the former certified recycling center in Laguna Woods did make it more difficult for resident consumers to redeem CRV fees. However, at that time there were locations in Laguna Niguel, Aliso Viejo etc. But then some of those locations also closed. There are currently no certified recycling centers in Laguna Woods and only three obligated retailers in Laguna Woods providing in-store CRV redemption. Of the 10 certified recycling centers located nearest Laguna Woods, two are in the city of Aliso Viejo, four are in the city of Irvine, one is in the...
F2
Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City agrees with this finding. In Laguna Woods, it is reasonable to assume that with the reduced availability of convenient CRV redemption sites, resident consumers are increasingly choosing to dispose of beverage containers with CRV value in recycling containers collected by the waste hauler. To the extent that the waste hauler chooses to separate beverage containers and subsequently redeem CRV fees, the waste hauler would be the beneficiary of CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. F3. CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills a...
F3
CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City disagrees partially with this finding. The City agrees that CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and is offering financial incentives to do so. While the City is eligible to apply for CalRecycle's Beverage Container Recycling Grant Program, the program provides one-time funding for new or enhanced ongoing collection programs. The City has not applied for funding in recent years as it lacks the financial resources to ensure that new or enhanced ongoing collection programs are maintained beyond the grant term. With respect to CalRe...
▶
City of Villa Park 08/24/22
August 24, 2022
•
2 pages
• 7 responses
•
Score: +3
(+3, 4, 0)
View Details ▾
7 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Due to the reduced availability of convenient CRV redemption sites and the lack of accurate online information, it is difficult for resident consumers to redeem CRV fees.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City of Villa Park agrees with this finding. The closure of redemption sites across the county has made it less convenient for residents to return their recyclables and has reduced participation in the CRV program. Finding F-2: Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers. City Response: The City agrees with this finding and understands that the lack of convenience for residents to return recyclables at redemption sites has offloaded the process onto waste haulers who then collect thos...
R1
By January of 2023, each of the cities in Orange County should research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for their community that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
As noted in the City's response to finding F-3, the City of Villa Park has limitations that prevent us from qualifying for some of CalRecycle's CRV grant programs. As such, this recommendation requires further analysis to find solutions and programs that work for smaller jurisdictions like Villa Park. Recommendation R-2: By January of 2023, the Orange County Board of Supervisors should require OC Waste & Recycling to research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for the unincorporated areas of OC that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. City Respon...
F2
Because redemption site locations have diminished in number, waste haulers are the beneficiaries to the CRV fees paid originally by resident consumers.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City agrees with this finding and understands that the lack of convenience for residents to return recyclables at redemption sites has offloaded the process onto waste haulers who then collect those fees themselves. Finding F-3: CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle. City Response: The City disagrees partially with this finding. While the Grand Jury's report...
R2
By January of 2023, the Orange County Board of Supervisors should require OC Waste & Recycling to research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for the unincorporated areas of OC that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3)
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
The City of Villa Park will not be implementing this recommendation. We are an incorporated city, so the governing of unincorporated areas within Orange County does not fall within our jurisdiction. Recommendation R-3: When renegotiating their current waste hauler contract, all cities and the County of Orange should assess the value of the CRV funds received by the waste hauler in their jurisdiction and creatively leverage this revenue for the benefit of their residents. City Response: The City is currently renegotiating our contract with our waste hauler. We will inquire whether our contracto...
F3
CalRecycle is attempting to improve CRV redemption and reduce CRV recyclables from landfills and are offering financial incentives to do so. Orange County and its cities are not fully taking advantage of the grant or pilot program opportunities available through CalRecycle.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The City disagrees partially with this finding. While the Grand Jury's report did note funding opportunities, the City of Villa Park does not meet all the qualifications and is therefore unable to take advantage of those opportunities. Villa Park covers approximately two square miles of Orange County, so it is not possible to identify six half-mile convenience zones CHAD ZIMMERMAN, Mayor * VINCE ROSSINI, Mayor Pro Tem ROBERT COLLACOTT, Councilmember * CRYSTAL MILES, Councilmember * ROBBIE PITTS, Councilmember
within our jurisdiction that would qualify us to apply for the CalRecycle Pilot Proj...
R3
When renegotiating their current waste hauler contract, all cities and the County of Orange should assess the value of the CRV funds received by the waste hauler in their jurisdiction and creatively leverage this revenue for the benefit of their residents. (F2, F4)
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
The City is currently renegotiating our contract with our waste hauler. We will inquire whether our contractor collects CRV funds and if that revenue can be repurposed to support community projects/events. Recommendation R-4: By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their jurisdiction. City Response: The City of Villa Park will implement this recommendation by posting information about how to locate the closest CRV redemption sites in our e-newsletter and on o...
R4
By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their jurisdiction. (F1, F3)
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
The City of Villa Park will implement this recommendation by posting information about how to locate the closest CRV redemption sites in our e-newsletter and on our social media pages. Sincerely, THE CITY OF VILLA PARK C Lod. 2 Chad Zimmerman Mayor
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Orange County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office