Orange County Grand Jury • 2024-2025 • Agency Response
Response to: City of Seal Beach

City of Seal Beach 08/13/25*

Published: August 14, 2025 4 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F3, F4, F10

Findings and Recommendations 9 findings

F1
Despite the increasing media coverage of Online Booking Agencies (OBAs), short-term rentals (STRs) are not a new phenomenon in Orange County. The City concurs that STRs existed well before the popularity of OBAs.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The steady growth of STR usage in the last decade raises concerns of potential public nuisance. The City concurs that the growth of STR uses has raised concerns of public nuisance.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Proactive home inspections of new and renewing STRs, which have been implemented in some Orange County cities, improve code enforcement and STR compliance with city ordinances. The City does not have evidence that necessarily supports this Finding, but believes that inspections are a useful tool in STR compliance, and incorporates inspections into its permitting process. City of Seal Beach Response to Grand Jury Report August 14, 2025
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Direct remittance of taxes by OBAs does not capture all transient occupancy tax (TOT) for an STR because of direct booking practices. The City concurs with this finding, a portion of Seal Beach STRs remit TOT independently.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Some cities in Orange County have outdated systems for tracking short-term rental TOT making the process less effective and more difficult for staff. The City can only attest to its own system, which is manual in nature at this time.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
In some cases, STRs are improperly recharacterized as long-term rentals to circumvent the collection of TOT and any applicable penalties. The City does not have any direct experience with such recharacterizations, but agrees it would be difficult for City staff to discern between the two without complaints or other reporting from neighbors.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Online Booking Agencies in foreign languages are outside the current capabilities of Code Enforcement to monitor and track unpermitted STRs. The City concurs with this Finding. Finding I0: Cities that fail to routinely review their STR waiting lists potentially lose TOT revenue and contribute to a greater prevalence of unpermitted STRs. Seal Beach actively manages the STR waiting list, and therefore has no direct evidence to support this Finding, but agrees the Finding is reasonable.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Locations that have hosted major events have reported an outsized increase in demand and pricing of STRs, a situation Orange County is likely to experience with the upcoming 2026 Los Angeles World Cup and 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. The City concurs with this Finding.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
City leaders have no regular communication with each other concerning STR issues, limiting opportunities to develop strategies and expertise to improve service. The City agrees that communication between leaders in different communities related to STRs is limited.
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.