Napa County Grand Jury • 2017-2018

to those benefits

Published: June 15, 2018 33 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 6 findings

F1
The Napa County Williamson-Act program does not provide any more protection from development than does existing zoning and the General Plan.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
No later than November 30, 2018, the Board of Supervisors commission an independent cost-benefit analysis of the Williamson-Act program, with public input, in which the cost to all stakeholders (e.g. schools, cities, special districts) in property tax revenues is considered so that the BOS may make informed decisions regarding the County’s continued participation in the Williamson-Act program.
F2
The Board of Supervisors lacks adequate information about the workings of the Napa County Williamson-Act program, of BOS options under it, and of the total lost property tax revenue to all Napa County entities that share in the revenue.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
No later than November 30, 2018, the Board of Supervisors commission an independent study of the County Williamson-Act program to determine whether the program comports with those programs in other counties and with best practices, and to recommend revisions to the program, including revisions to the minimum-imputed-income values in Type-H contracts.
F3
Williamson-Act contract enforcement is non-existent. Planning and Assessor staff have not informed the BOS of undersize parcels, parcels without agricultural income, and 16 parcels whose owners do not supply Assessor-requested information as required by contract and by law.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
No later than October 31, 2018, the Board of Supervisors commission an independent audit of the Napa County Williamson-Act program by the Auditor-Controller or outside agency to determine to what extent contract holders are in compliance with their contracts, the WA rules, and the law.
F4
The continued use of 1969 minimum-imputed-income values may result in Williamson-Act grazing parcels (Type-H) being systematically under assessed.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
No later than October 31, 2018, the Assessor revise his internal conflict-of-interest procedures so that at least two assessment-qualified personnel perform all the work on employee-owned properties. COMMENDATIONS: C1. The Grand Jury commends the County employees who came forward and assisted the Grand Jury with this investigation.
F5
The Board of Supervisors has not exercised effective supervision of the Williamson-Act program since at least 2008.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The Assessor lacks adequate conflict-of-interest procedures regarding his own properties with unqualified personnel assigned to “check” any work.
No recommendations for this finding

Conclusions 5

Commendations 1

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Napa County Assessor Elected County Office
Napa County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office