Kern County Grand Jury
• 2020-2021
Health, Education and Social Services Committee Gary Chaffin Earlene Hightower DonnaNewman Latricia McConnell
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F1
APS provides an admirable service to the senior and dependent residents of Kern County in terms of disseminating information. AASD has a public website which offers excellent information to those who are computer literate. 89
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
, Kern County Aging and Adult Services Department should assign Adult Protective Services workers to Senior Centers on a rotational basis to each of its districts, one or two days per month, to talk to concerned community members. (Finding 1)
F2
According to financial abuse referrals, the elderly in areas outside of the City of Bakersfield may be underserved by APS. It is inconceivable that of the 1,314 reported cases of elder financial abuse, 1,001 came from the City of Bakersfield, while only 313 came from the rest of Kern County.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Kern County Aging and Adult Services Department should develop a network consortium of agencies, businesses, and concerned citizens within each Adult Protective Services district (See
F3
Most elderly who are victimized are reluctant to report that they have been scammed. According to a report published by the American Bankers Association, only one in 44 elder financial abuse cases are reported.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
There are many agencies working to prevent elder financial abuse; however, these efforts are not consistent outside of Bakersfield.
Related Recommendations (2)
R3
Kern County Aging and Adult Services Department should seek grants to provide funding for a pilot neighborhood/district consortium concerned with reducing and/or preventing elder financial abuse. (Finding 4)
R5
The Sheriff should immediately provide better building security and also security for staff as they enter or exit the building. In the event of high-profile decedents, extra security personnel should be available. Monitored security cameras may be an option. (Finding 4)
F5
The Grand Jury was unable to determine the status of the referrals confirmed by APS to be elder financial abuse in 2019. This information is not available from the District Attorney, and it hinders an accurate accounting of elder financial abuse. COMMENTS: The Grand Jury would like to thank the staff of the AASD and the DA offices for their cooperation, candor and responsiveness. The staff interacting with the Grand Jury appeared to be genuinely dedicated, caring and concerned about elder abuse.
Related Recommendations (2)
R4
Kern County Aging and Adult Services Department should work with the District Attorney to develop procedures to track all elder abuse referrals through criminal prosecution. (Finding 5) 90 NOTES: Kern County Aging and Adult Services Department should post a copy of this report where it will be available for public review Persons wishing to receive an email notification of newly released reports may sign up at: kerncounty.com/grandjury Present and past Kern County Grand Jury Final Reports and Responses can be accessed on the Kern County Grand Jury website: kerncounty.com/grandjury REQUIRED RESPONSES WITHIN 90 DAYS TO: PRESIDING JUDGE KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE, SUITE 212 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 TRUXTUN AVENUE, SUITE 600 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.
R6
The Sheriff should make the security of the files and property stored in the warehouse a priority. Digitizing the files may be an option. The Sheriff should seek a grant in order to provide funding for this project. (Finding 5) 98 NOTES: • The Kern County Sheriff’s Office and the BOS should post a copy of this report where it will be available for public review. • Persons wishing to receive an email notification of newly released reports may sign up at: kerncounty.com/grandjury • Present and past Kern County Grand Jury Final Reports and Responses can be accessed on the Kern County Grand Jury website: kerncounty.com/grandjury REQUIRED RESPONSES WITHIN 60 DAYS TO: PRESIDING JUDGE KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE, SUITE 212 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 TRUXTUN AVENUE, SUITE 600 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.
Comments 3
-
CO1The Kern County Sheriff’s Office and the BOS should post a copy of this report where it will be available for public review.
-
CO2Persons wishing to receive an email notification of newly released reports may sign up at: kerncounty.com/grandjury
-
CO3Present and past Kern County Grand Jury Final Reports and Responses can be accessed on the Kern County Grand Jury website: kerncounty.com/grandjury REQUIRED RESPONSES WITHIN 60 DAYS TO: PRESIDING JUDGE KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE, SUITE 212 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 FOREPERSON KERN COUNTY GRAND JURY 1415 TRUXTUN AVENUE, SUITE 600 BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301 Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury. 2019-2020 Kern County Grand Jury Report 99 APPENDIX A AERIAL VIEW OF CORONER’S OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE Aerial photo from Google Earth 2019-2020 Kern County Grand Jury Report 100 APPENDIX B KERN COUNTY POPULATION 100k 140 1,063 120 1,021 100 937 869 840 778 80 690 638 60 40 20 0 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Projected Projected 2022 2024 Source: Placeworks 2015 Note: The population in the 1970s was approximately 350,000. 44 years later, the population increased to approximately 890,000. Kern County is projected to be 1.6 million by 2050. 2019-2020 Kern County Grand Jury Report 101 APPENDIX C CORONER EXAMS PERFORMED Increasing by 5% Per Year 1800 1,537 1600 1,394 1400 1,148 1200 1,081 1,006 1000 912 803 800 722 600 400 200 0 1998 2011 2013 2015 2016 2018 Projected Projected 2022 2024 Source: General Coroners Stats - 2018 2019-2020 Kern County Grand Jury Report 102 103 104 105 107 108
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Kern County
County