Sacramento County Grand Jury
• 2007-2008
Sacramento County Airport System Preamble To prepare for this report the Sacramento Grand Jury toured Sacramento
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F2, F3
Findings and Recommendations 2 findings
F1
Sacramento International's Master Plan was approved by the Board ofSupervisors in late 2007. It was drafted as a 20-year plan. However, as a result ofthe complex environmental reviews now required which take up to a cumulative eight years before completion, International's Master Plan is now a 12-year plan. Even though updates are planned every 5 years, it remains a short term airport plan.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Future airport master plans should be 30-Year Plans to take into account the impact ofdelays resulting from complex environmental reviews and extensive community input required prior to approval.
F4
Executive Airport's 5,500 foot runway is totally encroached by development.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
As appropriate, and without jeopardizing current flight operations, the County Airport Director should discourage jet aircraft from using Executive Airport, and, through incentives, encourage jet aircraft to use Mather Field, McClellan or International. Response Requirements Penal Code sections 933 and 933.5 require that specific responses to both the Findings and Recommendations contained in this report be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Sacramento Superior Court by October 1,2008, from: • Sacramento County Board of Supervisors, Findings 1, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, and 4; Recommendations 1, 2, 3, and 4. The 2007-2008 Grand Jury recognizes previous outreach efforts by the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to jurisdictions encompassed by the airport Policy Planning Areas. 55
Additional Recommendations 2
These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.
-
R2Sacramento County should ensure that land use restrictions and Avigation and Noise Easements are mandatory for all developments approved within International's Airport Policy Planning Area, to include neighboring s counties.
-
R3The County Board of Supervisors should establish an Aviation Committee ofselect airport and County staff directly responsible for overseeing and advocating the long-term regional importance and viability of Sacramento's airport system. Direct representation by regional airport experts on the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is recommended.
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Sacramento County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office